本文選題：綜合訓(xùn)練法 + 預(yù)防　； 參考：《解放軍預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)雜志》2006年03期

【摘要】：目的通過(guò)對(duì)209名大學(xué)生暈船病易感性預(yù)測(cè),對(duì)其中128名大學(xué)生進(jìn)行預(yù)防暈船病訓(xùn)練和訓(xùn)練效果評(píng)估,以建立預(yù)防暈船病綜合訓(xùn)練方案和評(píng)估方法。方法采用四柱秋千誘發(fā)試驗(yàn)結(jié)合個(gè)人史和心理學(xué)問(wèn)卷、Graybiel暈動(dòng)病評(píng)分法,進(jìn)行暈船病易感性預(yù)測(cè)。根據(jù)預(yù)測(cè)結(jié)果分組訓(xùn)練,實(shí)驗(yàn)1、2組進(jìn)行預(yù)防暈船病綜合訓(xùn)練,兩組訓(xùn)練的方法相同,但時(shí)間不一,對(duì)照組進(jìn)行傳統(tǒng)訓(xùn)練。訓(xùn)練結(jié)束后對(duì)訓(xùn)練效果進(jìn)行陸上和海上評(píng)估。結(jié)果陸上評(píng)估顯示,實(shí)驗(yàn)1組、實(shí)驗(yàn)2組訓(xùn)練后暈動(dòng)病發(fā)病率分別為58.62%、61.54%,明顯低于對(duì)照組(93.46%,P0.01);實(shí)驗(yàn)1組、實(shí)驗(yàn)2組訓(xùn)練后Graybiel評(píng)分法得分分別為(4.05±4.86)、(3.88±4.26),明顯低于對(duì)照組(11.37±8.28,P0.01),耐受時(shí)間分別為(17.91±3.50)min(、18.89±2.73)min,明顯高于對(duì)照組〔(15.59±5.11)min,P0.01〕,耐受指數(shù)分別為(88.89±19.01)(、91.13±14.51)明顯高于對(duì)照組(70.28±27.59,P0.01),實(shí)驗(yàn)1組、實(shí)驗(yàn)2組Graybiel評(píng)分法分級(jí)程度重的人數(shù)構(gòu)成明顯低于對(duì)照組(P0.01),表明實(shí)驗(yàn)1組、實(shí)驗(yàn)2組訓(xùn)練效果優(yōu)于對(duì)照組。實(shí)驗(yàn)2組訓(xùn)練前后Gray-biel評(píng)分得分差值(7.83±7.97)高于實(shí)驗(yàn)1組(3.50±5.76,P0.05),表明實(shí)驗(yàn)2組訓(xùn)練效果優(yōu)于實(shí)驗(yàn)1組。海上評(píng)估顯示,在3、4級(jí)海況時(shí),實(shí)驗(yàn)1組Graybiel評(píng)分得分分別為(4.31±7.29、2.83±3.57),明顯低于未訓(xùn)練組(10.50±7.52、5.95±5.74,P0.05),說(shuō)明實(shí)驗(yàn)1組訓(xùn)練可有效預(yù)防3、4級(jí)海況下的暈船病發(fā)生。結(jié)論在陸上進(jìn)行綜合訓(xùn)練法預(yù)防暈船病的效果優(yōu)于傳統(tǒng)訓(xùn)練法,在3、4級(jí)海況時(shí)能有效預(yù)防暈船病發(fā)生。
[Abstract]:Objective to predict the susceptibility of 209 college students to seasickness and to evaluate the effect of training on the prevention of seasickness among 128 college students in order to establish a comprehensive training scheme and evaluation method for the prevention of seasickness. Methods the susceptibility to seasickness was predicted by using four-column swing induction test combined with individual history and psychological questionnaire Graybiel motion sickness score. According to the predicted results, group 1 and group 2 were trained to prevent seasickness. The two groups had the same training method, but different time. The control group received traditional training. The training effect is evaluated on land and at sea after training. Results the onshore assessment showed that the incidence of motion sickness after training in experimental group 1 and experimental group 2 was 58.62 and 61.54 respectively, which was significantly lower than that in control group (93.46P 0.01). After training, the scores of Graybiel score were 4.05 鹵4.86 鹵3.88 鹵4.26, respectively, which were significantly lower than that of control group (11.37 鹵8.28), P 0.01a, tolerance time was 17.91 鹵3.50 min, 18.89 鹵2.73 min, significantly higher than that of control group (15.59 鹵5.11 min, P 0.01), and the tolerance index was 88.89 鹵19.01 min, 91.13 鹵14.51) significantly higher than that of control group (70.28 鹵27.9 min, P 0.011), and the tolerance index of experimental group 1 was significantly higher than that of control group. The number of people with heavy Graybiel grade in experiment 2 was significantly lower than that in control group (P 0.01), which indicated that the training effect of experimental group 2 was better than that of control group. The difference of Gray-biel score before and after training in group 2 was 7.83 鹵7.97, which was higher than that in group 1 (3.50 鹵5.76), which indicated that the effect of training in group 2 was better than that in group 1. At sea level, the Graybiel score of group 1 was 4.31 鹵7.29 鹵2.83 鹵3.57, which was significantly lower than that of untrained group (10.50 鹵7.52 鹵5.95 鹵5.74 P0.05N). Conclusion the comprehensive training on land is more effective than the traditional training method in preventing seasickness, and it can effectively prevent seasickness in 3 ~ 4 sea condition.
【作者單位】： 南京醫(yī)科大學(xué)公共衛(wèi)生學(xué)院 第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué)體育教研室 第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué)新藥評(píng)價(jià)中心 南京軍醫(yī)學(xué)院屬醫(yī)院海軍眩暈研究治療中心 南京軍醫(yī)學(xué)院屬醫(yī)院海軍眩暈研究治療中心 南京軍醫(yī)學(xué)院軍體教研室 第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué)體育教研室 南京軍醫(yī)學(xué)院軍體教研室
【基金】：全軍“十五”指令性項(xiàng)目課題(No.01L053)
【分類號(hào)】：R83

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 胡峰,孫學(xué)川,羅濤,康光全,游繼平;“抗眩暈操”的生理學(xué)基礎(chǔ)[J];解放軍體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

2 沈興華,楊月珍,王爾貴,楊健榮,張彩玲,任曉波,沈健恩,王倩;影響個(gè)體暈船病發(fā)生的心理社會(huì)因素[J];中國(guó)行為醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué);2004年01期

3 楊月珍,王爾貴,沈興華;運(yùn)用心理測(cè)量指標(biāo)篩檢暈船發(fā)病易感人群[J];解放軍預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2004年03期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 樂(lè)燕,劉曉虹,張?zhí)斐?包瀛春;暈船防治的心理學(xué)研究[J];第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期

2 侯建萍;蓋曉波;黃繼華;宋青揚(yáng);林文珍;;某部官兵初次航海暈動(dòng)病發(fā)病情況分析[J];西南國(guó)防醫(yī)藥;2006年05期

3 沈興華,楊月珍,王爾貴,楊健榮,張彩玲,任曉波,沈健恩,王倩;影響個(gè)體暈船病發(fā)生的心理社會(huì)因素[J];中國(guó)行為醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué);2004年01期

4 張勇;暈船病與性別和血型相關(guān)性的初步探討[J];中華航海醫(yī)學(xué)與高氣壓醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2004年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 周利梅;暈船易感大鼠腦干差異表達(dá)基因的研究[D];第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2004年

【二級(jí)參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王爾貴,薛龍?jiān)?張炳新,高建林;暈動(dòng)病的病因及防治[J];聽(tīng)力學(xué)及言語(yǔ)疾病雜志;2002年04期

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳德九;西藏高原農(nóng)牧業(yè)眼外傷及預(yù)防[J];眼外傷職業(yè)眼病雜志(附眼科手術(shù));1980年01期

2 屠德忠;工廠角膜異物傷的防治[J];眼外傷職業(yè)眼病雜志(附眼科手術(shù));1980年01期

3 傅宗田,羅秀梅,王書(shū)云;工業(yè)眼外傷的調(diào)查及預(yù)防的初步探討[J];眼外傷職業(yè)眼病雜志(附眼科手術(shù));1980年02期

4 馬永德,李振良,梁維敏,余秀榮,叢玉春,李維泮;預(yù)防和處理硬脊膜外麻醉嚴(yán)重并發(fā)癥的體會(huì)(附5,470例報(bào)告)[J];山東醫(yī)藥;1980年04期

5 劉萍,劉梅蕊,張年明;上肢靜脈輸液預(yù)防剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)中“仰臥位低血壓綜合征”30例觀察[J];山東醫(yī)藥;1980年11期

6 欒竟新,王訓(xùn)q，

本文編號(hào)：1777758