民航飛行員及空中乘務(wù)員人格模型的構(gòu)建
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-03 07:01
【摘要】：隨著航空業(yè)的迅猛發(fā)展，航空公司對(duì)飛行員和空中乘務(wù)員的需求越來(lái)越大。飛行員決定著安全水平，而空中乘務(wù)員體現(xiàn)著航空公司的服務(wù)品質(zhì)，這兩大人群是航空公司的靈魂，直接關(guān)系著航空公司的利益，因此，選拔高質(zhì)量的飛行員及空中乘務(wù)員顯得尤為重要。在人才選拔過(guò)程中，人格特征是決定飛行員及空中乘務(wù)員是否勝任崗位的一項(xiàng)很重要的指標(biāo)。本研究主要分為兩大部分：第一部分：民航飛行員人格模型的構(gòu)建 目的：探討民航飛行員的人格特點(diǎn)，建立適合飛行員群體個(gè)性特征的人格模型，為飛行員的選拔提供理論依據(jù)與技術(shù)支持。 方法：采用完全隨機(jī)抽樣的方法，應(yīng)用DXC-6型多項(xiàng)群體心理測(cè)評(píng)儀對(duì)民航飛行員進(jìn)行16PF人格測(cè)驗(yàn)，計(jì)算機(jī)播放指導(dǎo)語(yǔ)和題目并記錄被試作答的答案。 結(jié)果： (1)飛行員16PF各因子原始分與原常模進(jìn)行單樣本t檢驗(yàn)，在聰慧性、穩(wěn)定性、恃強(qiáng)性、興奮性、有恒性、敢為性、敏感性、懷疑性、幻想性、世故性、憂慮性、獨(dú)立性、自律性和緊張性14個(gè)因子上差異顯著，有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P0.05）；飛行員16PF時(shí)間分與原常模進(jìn)行單樣本t檢驗(yàn)，在樂(lè)群性、聰慧性、穩(wěn)定性、有恒性、幻想性、世故性、憂慮性、實(shí)驗(yàn)性、獨(dú)立性、自律性10個(gè)因子上差異顯著，有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P0.05）； (2)16PF大部分因素同質(zhì)性信度(Cronbach α)在0.50～0.81之間，斯皮爾曼分半信度在0.53～0.80之間,因素之間相關(guān)系數(shù)在0.00～0.59之間不等，絕大多數(shù)處于中等偏下的水平； (3)優(yōu)秀飛行員組與一般飛行員組進(jìn)行獨(dú)立樣本t檢驗(yàn)、秩和檢驗(yàn)，在穩(wěn)定性、恃強(qiáng)性、興奮性、有恒性、敢為性、憂慮性、獨(dú)立性、緊張性、適應(yīng)焦慮性、內(nèi)外向型、感情用事與安詳機(jī)警型、心理健康因素、專業(yè)成就個(gè)性因素和創(chuàng)造能力個(gè)性因素14個(gè)因子得分上差異顯著，有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)； (4)對(duì)兩個(gè)人群16PF各因子標(biāo)準(zhǔn)分進(jìn)行逐步差別分析，興奮性、敢為性、敏感性、懷疑性、憂慮性、獨(dú)立性、自律性、緊張性8個(gè)變量指標(biāo)進(jìn)入判別方程，判別系數(shù)依次為㧟0.278，0.176，0.345，0.216，0.266，㧟0.140，㧟0.283，0.172，常數(shù)項(xiàng)為㧟2.652，分界值C=㧟0.519； (5)因子分析提取公因子8個(gè)，其特征值分別為3.660，2.248，1.192，1.154，1.087，0.996，0.955，0.790，解釋變異量分別為22.88%，14.05%，7.45%，7.22%，6.79%，6.23%，5.97%，4.94%，累積解釋變異量75.51%。 結(jié)論： (1)16PF在民航飛行員群體中信效度良好； (2)飛行員具有情緒穩(wěn)定、獨(dú)立自信、理智隨和、自律負(fù)責(zé)的人格特點(diǎn)；優(yōu)秀飛行員人格呈現(xiàn)出情緒穩(wěn)定、外向、心理健康程度高、剛毅果斷、專業(yè)成就高的特點(diǎn)。 (3)對(duì)優(yōu)秀飛行員與一般飛行員進(jìn)行判別的函數(shù)表達(dá)式為：Y=㧟0.278F+0.176H+0.345I+0.216L+0.266O㧟0.14Q2㧟0.283Q3+0.172Q4㧟2.652 當(dāng)Y≤㧟0.519時(shí)，判別為優(yōu)秀飛行員；當(dāng)Y㧟0.519時(shí)，判別為一般飛行員； (4)基于16PF，民航飛行員的人格結(jié)構(gòu)模型為八因子模型。第二部分：空中乘務(wù)員人格模型的建構(gòu) 目的：探討空中乘務(wù)員的人格特點(diǎn)，建立相應(yīng)的人格模型，為空中乘務(wù)員的選拔提供理論依據(jù)和技術(shù)支持。 方法：采用隨機(jī)抽樣的方法，借助DXC-6型多項(xiàng)群體心理測(cè)評(píng)儀對(duì)空中乘務(wù)員進(jìn)行16PF人格測(cè)驗(yàn)，計(jì)算機(jī)播放指導(dǎo)語(yǔ)和題目并記錄被試作答的答案以及作答時(shí)間。 結(jié)果： (1)空乘16PF各因子原始分與原常模進(jìn)行單樣本t檢驗(yàn)，除恃強(qiáng)性、世故性兩因子外，空乘其余14個(gè)因子得分均與原常模均差異顯著，有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P0.05）； (2)男、女乘務(wù)員16PF各因子原始分進(jìn)行獨(dú)立樣本t檢驗(yàn)，在樂(lè)群性、敏感性、幻想性、憂慮性4個(gè)因子上得分差異顯著，有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P0.05），其中女乘務(wù)員在這4個(gè)因子上得分上高于男乘務(wù)員； (3)空乘16PF初級(jí)因子時(shí)間分與原常模進(jìn)行單樣本t檢驗(yàn)，結(jié)果顯示在敏感性、幻想性、世故性、實(shí)驗(yàn)性、緊張性5個(gè)因子維度上差異顯著，有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P0.05）； (4)16PF大部分因素同質(zhì)性信度在0.60～0.81之間，斯皮爾曼分半信度在0.63～0.85之間，相關(guān)系數(shù)在0.00～0.60之間不等，絕大多數(shù)因素之間的相關(guān)系數(shù)處于中等偏下的水平； (5)優(yōu)秀空乘組與一般空乘組進(jìn)行獨(dú)立樣本t檢驗(yàn)、秩和檢驗(yàn)，在樂(lè)群性、穩(wěn)定性、興奮性、有恒性、懷疑性、幻想性、自律性、緊張性、專業(yè)成就因素及新環(huán)境成長(zhǎng)能力因素得分上差異顯著，有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)，且在樂(lè)群性、穩(wěn)定性、有恒性、懷疑性、自律性、專業(yè)成就因素及新環(huán)境成長(zhǎng)能力7個(gè)因子維度上，優(yōu)秀乘務(wù)員組得分高于一般乘務(wù)員組(P0.05)； (6)經(jīng)逐步差別分析，聰慧性、有恒性、獨(dú)立性3個(gè)變量指標(biāo)進(jìn)入判別方程，判別系數(shù)依次為㧟0.341，㧟0.488，0.404常數(shù)項(xiàng)為㧟1.254，分界值C=㧟0.325； (7)經(jīng)因子分析，空乘的人格結(jié)構(gòu)為八因子模型，8個(gè)公因子的特征值分別為3.866，1.900，1.419，1.235，1.026，0.975，0.794，0.778，解釋變異量分別為24.16%，11.88%，8.87%，，7.72%，6.41%，6.09%，4.96%，4.86%,累積解釋變異量74.96%。 結(jié)論： (1)16PF在空中乘務(wù)員群體中信效度良好； (2)空中乘務(wù)員總體呈現(xiàn)出開朗隨和、情緒穩(wěn)定、自律負(fù)責(zé)、感情細(xì)膩的人格特征。男、女乘務(wù)員在樂(lè)群性、敏感性、幻想性、憂慮性4個(gè)因子維度上呈現(xiàn)出完全不同的個(gè)性特點(diǎn)，其中女乘務(wù)員較之男乘務(wù)員，人格特征更多的表現(xiàn)出外向熱情、感情細(xì)膩等特點(diǎn)。優(yōu)秀空中乘務(wù)員具有外向熱情、情緒穩(wěn)定、隨和自律、有恒負(fù)責(zé)的人格特征；同時(shí)優(yōu)秀乘務(wù)員也表現(xiàn)出專業(yè)成就能力強(qiáng)、新環(huán)境適應(yīng)能力強(qiáng)的特點(diǎn)。 (3)優(yōu)秀空中乘務(wù)員與一般乘務(wù)員判別函數(shù)模型表達(dá)式為：Y=㧟0.341B㧟0.488G+0.404Q2㧟1.254 當(dāng)Y≤㧟0.325時(shí)，判別為優(yōu)秀空中乘務(wù)員；當(dāng)Y㧟0.325時(shí)，判別為一般空中乘務(wù)員； (4)基于16PF的16項(xiàng)根源特質(zhì)，空中乘務(wù)員的人格特征呈現(xiàn)八因子結(jié)構(gòu)。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the aviation industry, the demand for pilots and flight attendants is increasing. Pilots determine the level of safety and air crew embodies the service quality of the airline. These two people are the soul of the airline, directly related to the interests of the airline company. Therefore, the selection of high quality pilots and empty space. In the process of talent selection, personality is a very important index to determine whether the pilot and the flight attendant are competent. This study is divided into two parts: the first part: the construction of the personality model of the civil aviation pilot
Objective: To explore the personality characteristics of civil aviation pilots and to establish a personality model suitable for the personality of the pilot group, so as to provide theoretical basis and technical support for the selection of pilots.
Methods: using the method of complete random sampling, the 16PF personality test was carried out for civil aviation pilots with DXC-6 multi group psychological tester. The computer played guidance and questions and recorded the answers to the answers.
Result:
(1) a single sample t test was carried out between the original 16PF factor and the original norm of the pilot. The difference between the 14 factors of intelligence, stability, bulness, excitement, identity, sensitivity, suspicion, fantasy, sophistication, anxiety, independence, self-discipline and tension was statistically significant (P0.05); the pilot's 16PF time and the original norm A single sample t test was performed on 10 factors of music, intelligence, stability, identity, fantasy, sophistication, anxiety, experimentation, independence and self-discipline, with statistical significance (P0.05).
(2) the homogeneity reliability (Cronbach alpha) of most factors of 16PF was between 0.50 and 0.81, and the half reliability of Spielman was between 0.53 and 0.80. The correlation coefficient between factors ranged from 0 to 0.59, and the overwhelming majority was at the middle level.
(3) the excellent pilot group and the general pilot group carried out independent sample t test, rank sum test, in stability, bulness, excitement, constancy, dares, anxiety, independence, tension, adaptation to anxiety, internal and external type, emotional and serenity, psychological health, professional achievement personality factors and creative personality factors 14 factors. There was a significant difference in factor scores, with statistical significance (P0.05).
(4) step by step analysis of the standard scores of each factor of 16PF in two groups, 8 variables, excitability, dares, sensibility, suspicion, anxiety, independence, self-discipline and tension, were entered into the discriminant equation, and the discriminant coefficient was 0.278,0.176,0.345,0.216,0.266,? 0.140,? 0.283,0.172, the constant term was 2.652, and the boundary value C=? 0.519;
(5) factor analysis extracts 8 common factors, whose eigenvalues are 3.660,2.248,1.192,1.154,1.087,0.996,0.955,0.790 respectively, and the explanatory variations are 22.88%, 14.05%, 7.45%, 7.22%, 6.79%, 6.23%, 5.97%, 4.94%, respectively, to explain the variation of 75.51%.
Conclusion:
(1) 16PF has good validity in civil aviation pilots.
(2) the pilots have the characteristics of emotional stability, independence, self confidence, intellectual and self-discipline, and self disciplined personality. The personality of the excellent pilot is characterized by emotional stability, extrovert, high mental health, resolute and resolute, and high professional achievement.
(3) The function expression for distinguishing excellent pilots from ordinary pilots is Y=? 0.278F+0.176H+0.345I+0.216L+0.266O?0.14Q2?0.283Q3+0.172Q4?2.652?
When Y is less than 0.519, it is classified as an excellent pilot; when Y? 0.519, it is classified as a general pilot.
(4) Based on 16PF, the personality structure model of civil aviation pilots is an eight-factor model. Part II: Construction of the personality model of air crew
Objective: To explore the personality characteristics of air crew and establish the corresponding personality model so as to provide theoretical basis and technical support for the selection of air crew.
Methods: using the random sampling method, the air flight attendants were tested on the 16PF personality test with the aid of the DXC-6 multi group psychological tester. The computer played the guidance and questions and recorded the answer and the time of answer.
Result:
(1) a single sample t test of the original 16PF factor of the flight attendants and the original norm was carried out. Besides the strength and the two factor of the world, the scores of the other 14 factors of the flight attendants were all significantly different from those of the original norm (P0.05).
(2) male, female flight attendants 16PF factors of the original score of the independent sample t test, in the group, sensitivity, fantasy, anxiety, 4 factors are significant differences, there is statistical significance (P0.05), of which the female stewardess on these 4 factors is higher than the male steward;
(3) a single sample t test was performed on the primary factor time and the original norm of the 16PF. The results showed that there were significant differences in the 5 factors of sensitivity, fantasy, sophistication, experimentation and tension (P0.05).
(4) the homogeneity reliability of most factors of 16PF is between 0.60 and 0.81, and the half reliability of Spielman is between 0.63 and 0.85, the correlation coefficient varies from 0 to 0.60, and the correlation coefficient between most factors is at the middle level.
(5) the independent sample t test of the excellent flight attendants and the general flight attendants, the rank sum test, the scores in the scores of the group, stability, excitement, constancy, suspicion, fantasy, self-discipline, tension, professional achievement factors and new environment growth factors, are statistically significant (P0.05), and in the group, stability, persistence, and suspicion. The score of excellent flight attendant group was higher than that of general flight attendant group (P 0.05).
(6) after the gradual difference analysis, the 3 variables of intelligence, persistence and independence entered the discriminant equation. The discriminant coefficient was 0.341, the 0.488,0.404 constant term was 1.254, and the boundary value was C=? 0.325.
(7) by factor analysis, the personality structure of the flight attendants is a eight factor model, and the eigenvalues of 8 common factors are 3.866,1.900,1.419,1.235,1.026,0.975,0.794,0.778 respectively, and the explanatory variations are 24.16%, 11.88%, 8.87%, 7.72%, 6.41%, 6.09%, 4.96%, 4.86%, cumulative interpretation of variation 74.96%.
Conclusion:
(1) 16PF has good validity in the air crew group.
(2) the flight attendants generally show an open and easy-going, emotional stability, self-discipline, and delicate personality characteristics. Male and female attendants have completely different personality characteristics on the 4 factors of happiness, sensitivity, fantasy and anxiety, of which female stewardship is more extroverted than male stewardship, and more personality characteristics show extrovert enthusiasm. The excellent air crew is enthusiastic, emotionally stable, easy-going and self disciplined, and has a constant and responsible personality. At the same time, the excellent crew also shows the ability of professional achievement and the ability to adapt to the new environment.
(3) the discriminant function model for excellent flight attendants and general attendants is: Y=? 0.341B? 0.488G+0.404Q2? 1.254
When Y is less than 0.325, it is classified as an excellent flight attendant; when Y? 0.325, it is classified as a general air steward.
(4) based on the 16 root characteristics of 16PF, the personality characteristics of flight attendants show a eight factor structure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：第四軍醫(yī)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：R851.3
本文編號(hào)：2160943
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the aviation industry, the demand for pilots and flight attendants is increasing. Pilots determine the level of safety and air crew embodies the service quality of the airline. These two people are the soul of the airline, directly related to the interests of the airline company. Therefore, the selection of high quality pilots and empty space. In the process of talent selection, personality is a very important index to determine whether the pilot and the flight attendant are competent. This study is divided into two parts: the first part: the construction of the personality model of the civil aviation pilot
Objective: To explore the personality characteristics of civil aviation pilots and to establish a personality model suitable for the personality of the pilot group, so as to provide theoretical basis and technical support for the selection of pilots.
Methods: using the method of complete random sampling, the 16PF personality test was carried out for civil aviation pilots with DXC-6 multi group psychological tester. The computer played guidance and questions and recorded the answers to the answers.
Result:
(1) a single sample t test was carried out between the original 16PF factor and the original norm of the pilot. The difference between the 14 factors of intelligence, stability, bulness, excitement, identity, sensitivity, suspicion, fantasy, sophistication, anxiety, independence, self-discipline and tension was statistically significant (P0.05); the pilot's 16PF time and the original norm A single sample t test was performed on 10 factors of music, intelligence, stability, identity, fantasy, sophistication, anxiety, experimentation, independence and self-discipline, with statistical significance (P0.05).
(2) the homogeneity reliability (Cronbach alpha) of most factors of 16PF was between 0.50 and 0.81, and the half reliability of Spielman was between 0.53 and 0.80. The correlation coefficient between factors ranged from 0 to 0.59, and the overwhelming majority was at the middle level.
(3) the excellent pilot group and the general pilot group carried out independent sample t test, rank sum test, in stability, bulness, excitement, constancy, dares, anxiety, independence, tension, adaptation to anxiety, internal and external type, emotional and serenity, psychological health, professional achievement personality factors and creative personality factors 14 factors. There was a significant difference in factor scores, with statistical significance (P0.05).
(4) step by step analysis of the standard scores of each factor of 16PF in two groups, 8 variables, excitability, dares, sensibility, suspicion, anxiety, independence, self-discipline and tension, were entered into the discriminant equation, and the discriminant coefficient was 0.278,0.176,0.345,0.216,0.266,? 0.140,? 0.283,0.172, the constant term was 2.652, and the boundary value C=? 0.519;
(5) factor analysis extracts 8 common factors, whose eigenvalues are 3.660,2.248,1.192,1.154,1.087,0.996,0.955,0.790 respectively, and the explanatory variations are 22.88%, 14.05%, 7.45%, 7.22%, 6.79%, 6.23%, 5.97%, 4.94%, respectively, to explain the variation of 75.51%.
Conclusion:
(1) 16PF has good validity in civil aviation pilots.
(2) the pilots have the characteristics of emotional stability, independence, self confidence, intellectual and self-discipline, and self disciplined personality. The personality of the excellent pilot is characterized by emotional stability, extrovert, high mental health, resolute and resolute, and high professional achievement.
(3) The function expression for distinguishing excellent pilots from ordinary pilots is Y=? 0.278F+0.176H+0.345I+0.216L+0.266O?0.14Q2?0.283Q3+0.172Q4?2.652?
When Y is less than 0.519, it is classified as an excellent pilot; when Y? 0.519, it is classified as a general pilot.
(4) Based on 16PF, the personality structure model of civil aviation pilots is an eight-factor model. Part II: Construction of the personality model of air crew
Objective: To explore the personality characteristics of air crew and establish the corresponding personality model so as to provide theoretical basis and technical support for the selection of air crew.
Methods: using the random sampling method, the air flight attendants were tested on the 16PF personality test with the aid of the DXC-6 multi group psychological tester. The computer played the guidance and questions and recorded the answer and the time of answer.
Result:
(1) a single sample t test of the original 16PF factor of the flight attendants and the original norm was carried out. Besides the strength and the two factor of the world, the scores of the other 14 factors of the flight attendants were all significantly different from those of the original norm (P0.05).
(2) male, female flight attendants 16PF factors of the original score of the independent sample t test, in the group, sensitivity, fantasy, anxiety, 4 factors are significant differences, there is statistical significance (P0.05), of which the female stewardess on these 4 factors is higher than the male steward;
(3) a single sample t test was performed on the primary factor time and the original norm of the 16PF. The results showed that there were significant differences in the 5 factors of sensitivity, fantasy, sophistication, experimentation and tension (P0.05).
(4) the homogeneity reliability of most factors of 16PF is between 0.60 and 0.81, and the half reliability of Spielman is between 0.63 and 0.85, the correlation coefficient varies from 0 to 0.60, and the correlation coefficient between most factors is at the middle level.
(5) the independent sample t test of the excellent flight attendants and the general flight attendants, the rank sum test, the scores in the scores of the group, stability, excitement, constancy, suspicion, fantasy, self-discipline, tension, professional achievement factors and new environment growth factors, are statistically significant (P0.05), and in the group, stability, persistence, and suspicion. The score of excellent flight attendant group was higher than that of general flight attendant group (P 0.05).
(6) after the gradual difference analysis, the 3 variables of intelligence, persistence and independence entered the discriminant equation. The discriminant coefficient was 0.341, the 0.488,0.404 constant term was 1.254, and the boundary value was C=? 0.325.
(7) by factor analysis, the personality structure of the flight attendants is a eight factor model, and the eigenvalues of 8 common factors are 3.866,1.900,1.419,1.235,1.026,0.975,0.794,0.778 respectively, and the explanatory variations are 24.16%, 11.88%, 8.87%, 7.72%, 6.41%, 6.09%, 4.96%, 4.86%, cumulative interpretation of variation 74.96%.
Conclusion:
(1) 16PF has good validity in the air crew group.
(2) the flight attendants generally show an open and easy-going, emotional stability, self-discipline, and delicate personality characteristics. Male and female attendants have completely different personality characteristics on the 4 factors of happiness, sensitivity, fantasy and anxiety, of which female stewardship is more extroverted than male stewardship, and more personality characteristics show extrovert enthusiasm. The excellent air crew is enthusiastic, emotionally stable, easy-going and self disciplined, and has a constant and responsible personality. At the same time, the excellent crew also shows the ability of professional achievement and the ability to adapt to the new environment.
(3) the discriminant function model for excellent flight attendants and general attendants is: Y=? 0.341B? 0.488G+0.404Q2? 1.254
When Y is less than 0.325, it is classified as an excellent flight attendant; when Y? 0.325, it is classified as a general air steward.
(4) based on the 16 root characteristics of 16PF, the personality characteristics of flight attendants show a eight factor structure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：第四軍醫(yī)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：R851.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 敖小蘭,石竹屏;心理學(xué)中人格評(píng)估法綜述[J];重慶交通學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期
2 田建全,苗丹民,羅正學(xué),孫振江,陳靜;陸軍學(xué)院學(xué)員勝任特征模型的建立[J];第四軍醫(yī)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期
3 苗丹民,羅正學(xué),王京生,陳靜;初級(jí)軍官勝任特征心理品質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)模型建立[J];第四軍醫(yī)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年08期
4 劉軍,宋華淼,陳強(qiáng),敖景文,張志林;飛行人員個(gè)性及心理健康狀況的量表評(píng)價(jià)[J];航空軍醫(yī);2002年04期
5 王華葉;林嶺;;優(yōu)秀民航飛行員心理特征實(shí)證研究[J];航天醫(yī)學(xué)與醫(yī)學(xué)工程;2011年04期
6 崔淑范,翟洪昌;管理人員創(chuàng)造性人格特征研究[J];健康心理學(xué)雜志;2000年03期
7 孫景泰,李珠;我國(guó)現(xiàn)役飛行員心理品質(zhì)模型的研究[J];健康心理學(xué)雜志;2001年03期
8 田建全;苗丹民;貢京京;;軍校學(xué)員領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力勝任特征模型的建立[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2007年07期
9 高翠翠;朱麗娟;李春燕;;中國(guó)民航飛行員心理選拔存在問(wèn)題及改進(jìn)措施[J];考試周刊;2009年11期
10 王揚(yáng);劉紅巾;陳靜;肖曉光;苗丹民;李燕玉;;空軍飛行學(xué)員2013例人格類型分析[J];人民軍醫(yī);2008年03期
本文編號(hào)：2160943
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/yundongyixue/2160943.html
最近更新
教材專著
