本文選題：應(yīng)激 + 心理學(xué)��； 參考：《中國全科醫(yī)學(xué)》2017年11期

【摘要】：目的探討認知情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略、心理彈性和軍人急性應(yīng)激反應(yīng)之間的關(guān)系。方法采用便利抽樣法,抽取某軍區(qū)1 553名官兵進行團體問卷測試,測試時間為參加某軍演前1周內(nèi)�；厥沼行柧�1 477份,有效回收率為95.11%。采用認知情緒調(diào)節(jié)問卷中文版(CERQ-C)、心理彈性量表(CD-RISC)和軍人急性應(yīng)激反應(yīng)量表對官兵進行測試,運用結(jié)構(gòu)方程分析變量之間的相互關(guān)系。結(jié)果適應(yīng)性調(diào)節(jié)策略高分組應(yīng)激反應(yīng)得分高于適應(yīng)性調(diào)節(jié)策略低分組(t=-2.14,P=0.03)。非適應(yīng)性調(diào)節(jié)策略高分組應(yīng)激反應(yīng)得分高于非適應(yīng)性調(diào)節(jié)策略低分組(t=-11.93,P0.001)。心理彈性高分組應(yīng)激反應(yīng)得分低于心理彈性低分組(t=7.93,P0.001)。應(yīng)激生理反應(yīng)和應(yīng)激心理反應(yīng)與自強、堅韌、樂觀維度均呈負相關(guān)(P0.05);與非適應(yīng)性調(diào)節(jié)策略、適應(yīng)性調(diào)節(jié)策略均呈正相關(guān)(P0.05);自強、堅韌、樂觀與適應(yīng)性調(diào)節(jié)策略呈正相關(guān)(P0.05)。非適應(yīng)性調(diào)節(jié)策略對應(yīng)激反應(yīng)有直接正向影響(β=0.374,P0.01);心理彈性在非適應(yīng)性調(diào)節(jié)策略和應(yīng)激反應(yīng)之間的中介效應(yīng)值為-0.260×-0.216≈0.056,中介效應(yīng)占總效應(yīng)的比例為13.06%。適應(yīng)性調(diào)節(jié)策略直接作用不顯著(P0.05),心理彈性在適應(yīng)性調(diào)節(jié)策略和應(yīng)激反應(yīng)之間的中介效應(yīng)值為0.484×-0.216≈-0.105。模型擬合良好[χ~2/df=1.059,近似誤差均方根(RMSEA)=0.006,比較擬合指數(shù)(CFI)=1,擬合優(yōu)度指數(shù)(GFI)=0.998,調(diào)整擬合優(yōu)度指數(shù)(AGFI)=0.994,基準化擬合指數(shù)(NFI)=0.998,相對擬合指數(shù)(RFI)=0.994,增量擬合指數(shù)(IFI)=1,Tucker-Lewis擬合指數(shù)(TLI)=1]。結(jié)論非適應(yīng)性調(diào)節(jié)策略對軍人急性應(yīng)激反應(yīng)既存在直接影響,也通過心理彈性間接影響急性應(yīng)激反應(yīng),適應(yīng)性調(diào)節(jié)策略僅通過心理彈性間接影響應(yīng)激反應(yīng)。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation strategies, mental resilience and acute stress response in military personnel. Methods 1 553 officers and soldiers in a military region were selected for group questionnaire test by convenience sampling method. The test time was 1 week before participating in a certain military exercise. A total of 1 477 valid questionnaires were collected and the effective recovery rate was 95.11%. The Chinese version of Cognitive emotion Adjustment questionnaire (CERQ-CU), Psychoelasticity scale (REC) and soldiers' Acute stress response scale (ACSR) were used to analyze the relationship between the variables. Results the stress response score of the high score group was higher than that of the low group. The stress response score of the high score group was higher than that of the low group. The stress response score in the high score group was lower than that in the low score group. Stress physiological response and stress psychological response were negatively correlated with self-strengthening, tenacity and optimism; with non-adaptive regulation strategies, adaptive adjustment strategies were positively correlated with P0.05; self-strengthening, tenacity, optimism and adaptive regulatory strategies were positively correlated with P0.05. Non-adaptive regulation strategy had direct positive effect on stress response (尾 -0.374) P0.01.The mediating effect of psychological elasticity between non-adaptive regulation strategy and stress response was -0.260 脳 -0.216 鈮，

本文編號：1828751