冠心病家族史陽性PCI患者臨床和冠狀動脈病變特點分析
[Abstract]:Objective: To analyze the clinical and coronary artery disease characteristics of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with family history of coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods: From December 2006 to June 2014, a total of 13,800 patients with coronary heart disease (PCI) were diagnosed by coronary angiography in Taida International Cardiovascular Hospital, and the positive group of family history of coronary heart disease (positive group) was screened by telephone follow-up. The relatives were divided into two groups (parent group), brother and sister group (brother and sister group), and parent and sister group (mixed group). A group of 1000 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) who had no history of coronary heart disease were randomly selected as control group. To compare the characteristics of clinical and coronary lesions among the groups. Result: 1. The incidence of body mass index (BMI), mean lesion revascularization, and diabetes, hypertension, left trunk lesion, and single/ double/ triple lesions were consistent with the negative group in the positive group (1, 300, 9. 4% of the total number of PCI); the incidence of age and smoking was significantly lower than in the negative group (60. 3: 69.1, P0. 001; 49. 8%: 55. 3%, P = 0. 010); the incidence and average number of implanted stents in men, hyperlipidemia, myocardial infarction, right coronary/ open/ chronic total occlusion (CTO) were significantly greater than that of the negative group (70.4%: 62. 0%, 67. 4%: 44. 8%, 36. 0%: 29. 1%, P = 0. 000; 61.6%: 59.4%,P=0.007;21.0%:14.5%,P=0.000;12.0%:8.5%,P=0.006;1.93:1.74,P=0.000).2. The mean age of parent group was significantly lower than that of negative group (57. 3: 60.9, P = 0.000), while the proportion of male and hyperlipidemic patients was higher than that of the negative group (75.3%: 62. 0%, P = 0. 000; 70. 0%: 44. 8%, P = 0. 000; 1. 90: 1. 98, P = 0. 000; 19. 9%: 14.5%, P = 0.0005; 11.7%:8.5%,P=0.037). The mean BMI of siblings, the proportion of smoking patients and the proportion of single lesions were lower than those in the negative group (25.9: 2.6. 2, P = 0.018; 30. 0%: 37. 3%, P = 0. 005), while the mean age, mean number of implanted stents, hyperlipidemia, myocardial infarction, triple lesions and open lesions, CTO lesions were all higher than those of the negative group (63.2: 61.9,P=0.006;1.98:1.74,P=0.000;63.3%:44.8%,P=0.000;38.4%:29.1%,P=0.000;36.2%:29.6%,P=0.008;19.8%:14.5%,P=0.011;12.2%:8.5%,P=0.020). The proportion of single branch lesion in the mixed group was lower than that of the negative group (29. 0%: 37. 3%, P = 0.031), while the proportion of hypertension and hyperlipidemia was higher than that of the negative group (66. 0%: 60. 3%, P = 0.011; 82.4%: 44. 8%, P = 0.000; 36. 2%: 29. 1%, P = 0.046; 37.1%:29.6%,P=0.047;28.0%:14.5%,P=0.000;12.7%:8.5%,P=0.011).3. Compared with parent group (599 cases, 46.1% of positive cases), sister and sister group (515 cases, 39. 6%), the incidence of three lesions was significantly higher (63.2: 57. 3, p = 0.000; 2.06: 1.90, p = 0.00001; 30.3%: 23.8%, p = 0.015; 36. 2%: 28. 4%, p = 0. 005), while men, Smoking, single lesion and bmi were low (66. 1%: 75. 3%, p = 0. 001; 4.5. 2%: 53. 7%, p = 0. 003; 30. 0%: 39. 1%, p = 0. 002; 25. 9: 26. 4, p = 0. 002). The incidence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia and open lesions was higher in the mixed group (186 cases, 14. 3% of the positive cases), and the incidence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia and open lesions was higher than that of the parent group (P0.05). There was no significant difference between the three groups of population gensini integral moderate group. There was no significant difference between the group of parents and the group of siblings (27. 5% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.0009; 27. 5% vs. 18. 0%, p = 0. 000), but was significantly lower than that of the negative group (2.4% vs. 33.3%, p = 0. 000), whereas the higher group was slightly more than the negative group but there was no statistical difference, significantly lower than that of the siblings (21. 7% vs. 30. 5%, p=0.001). There was no significant difference between the lower group and the middle group in the brother and sister group compared with the control group, the higher group was significantly lower than that of the negative group, and the high group was significantly higher than that of the negative group (34.5% vs. 19.3%, p = 0.000). Conclusion: The positive rate of family history of coronary heart disease in 1. pci patients is 94.4%. By comparing the general data of PCi patients with family history of coronary heart disease and PCi patients with family history of coronary heart disease, the average onset age of PCi patients with positive coronary heart disease is small, smoking rate is low, while men, hyperlipidemia, myocardial infarction and right coronary artery disease, open lesions, The incidence of cto lesions was high and the average number of implanted stents was higher. Compared with PCi patients without family history of coronary heart disease, the positive sub-group of family history of coronary heart disease found that the average age of parents affected the disease was low, while the proportion of male and hyperlipidemic patients was high, the ratio of complicated lesion (opening and cto) was high, and the average body weight coefficient of patients with siblings was higher. Smoking rate, single lesion ratio was low, mean age was high, average implanted stent number, hyperlipidemia, myocardial infarction, triple lesion and complex lesion ratio were high; the proportion of single branch lesion in mixed group was low, while hypertension, hyperlipidemia, myocardial infarction, triple lesion and complex lesion ratio were high. The positive sub-group found that the average incidence of disease was higher than that of parents affected by the disease, the average lesion revascularization, diabetes mellitus, right coronary artery, triple lesion rate was high, and the genenini integral high packet ratio was higher. Explain that sibling patients have a higher risk compared to their parents. In short, patients with family history of coronary heart disease, especially parents, have a lower average age. The proportion of other risk factors in patients with family history of positive coronary heart disease is higher, and the severity of coronary artery is more serious, especially those with siblings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:天津醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2016
【分類號】:R541.4
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 黃久儀,李良壽,何耀,李蘭蓀,賈國良;冠心病家族史在冠心病發(fā)病中作用地位的研究[J];中國慢性病預(yù)防與控制;1993年04期
2 向偉,陳熾,趙水平,符生苗,熊正東,郭德興,王福利,王海楓,周宏年,吳小川,劉建華;冠心病家族史兒童脂質(zhì)三角的研究[J];中國當代兒科雜志;2002年06期
3 王新利,李松,童笑梅,葉鴻瑁;兒童血脂及脂蛋白水平與冠心病家族史關(guān)系分析[J];中國兒童保健雜志;2002年03期
4 劉彬;冠心病家族史陽性兒童血脂研究[J];中國冶金工業(yè)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2002年03期
5 朱愛仙;付沫若;張達言;胡錦輝;萬友華;鄧寶妹;陳佩仙;;冠心病家族史對兒童血脂水平的影響[J];現(xiàn)代診斷與治療;1991年04期
6 李青;李志;崔新明;;早發(fā)冠心病家族史青年子代性別與血管內(nèi)皮功能的關(guān)系[J];中國臨床康復(fù);2005年35期
7 向偉 ,符生苗 ,陳熾 ,吳明 ,李新明 ,謝慧能 ,王福利 ,王海楓 ,趙水平 ,周宏年 ,吳小川 ,劉建華;83例有冠心病家族史兒童臨床分析[J];中國醫(yī)師雜志;2002年12期
8 向偉,符生苗,吳明,陳熾,王福利,王海楓,趙水平,熊正東,周宏年;冠心病家族史兒童血壓水平的研究[J];心血管康復(fù)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2002年05期
9 向偉,趙水平,陳熾,符生苗,熊正東,郭德興,王福利,王海楓,周宏年,吳小川,劉建華;冠心病家族史兒童血漿脂類水平的研究[J];心血管康復(fù)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2001年04期
10 余國膺;;JACC精選其2012年預(yù)防、質(zhì)量和價效比報道亮點[J];中國心臟起搏與心電生理雜志;2013年03期
相關(guān)會議論文 前3條
1 劉彬;;關(guān)于冠心病家族史陽性少年兒童血脂的研究[A];西部大開發(fā) 科教先行與可持續(xù)發(fā)展——中國科協(xié)2000年學(xué)術(shù)年會文集[C];2000年
2 趙玫;白小涓;趙彥艷;張明;于亞媛;陳長熙;孫英賢;;具有早發(fā)冠心病家族史的健康同胞血脂水平及載脂蛋白E基因多態(tài)性分析[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會心血管病分會第八次全國心血管病學(xué)術(shù)會議匯編[C];2004年
3 趙玫;白小涓;趙彥艷;張明;于亞媛;陳長熙;孫英賢;;具有早發(fā)冠心病家族史“健康”同胞的血脂水平及ApoE基因多態(tài)性分析[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會心血管病分會第八次全國心血管病學(xué)術(shù)會議匯編[C];2004年
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條
1 蒼!×簩W(xué)亞 吉鴻杰 黃敬 易善永;“雁來”風(fēng)雪易傷人[N];中國中醫(yī)藥報;2009年
2 唐夏;警惕心梗的非典型先兆[N];中國消費者報;2007年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 周彥民;冠心病家族史陽性PCI患者臨床和冠狀動脈病變特點分析[D];天津醫(yī)科大學(xué);2016年
,本文編號:2275844
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/xxg/2275844.html