Acute coronary syndrome Prasugrel Ticagrelor Systematic revi
本文關(guān)鍵詞:普拉格雷和替格瑞洛治療急性冠脈綜合征的Meta分析,由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。
普拉格雷和替格瑞洛治療急性冠脈綜合征的Meta分析
Prasugrel and Ticagrelor for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
TAN Xiao-hui, LIANG Zhuan-he, LIU Jie-qiang, LUO Yi-zhi, ZHU Ke-yun, LI Zhi-liang( 1. Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China; 2. Department of Cardiovasology, Xinh
[1]南方醫(yī)科大學(xué),廣州510515; [2]南方醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬新會(huì)醫(yī)院心血管內(nèi)科,廣東江門529100; [3]南方醫(yī)科大學(xué)珠江醫(yī)院心血管內(nèi)科,廣州510280
文章摘要:目的系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)新型血小板P2Y12受體抑制劑普拉格雷和替格瑞洛治療急性冠脈綜合征(acute coronary syndrome,ACS)的療效及安全性。方法計(jì)算機(jī)檢索PubMed(1980~2013.7)、EMbase(1980—2013.5)、TheCochraneLibrary(2013年第7期)、CBM(1990~2013.7)、CNKI(1994~2013.7)、VIP(1989~2013.7)和WanFangData(1980~2013.7),收集普拉格雷或替格瑞洛對(duì)比氯吡格雷治療ACS的隨機(jī)對(duì)照試驗(yàn)(RCT)。由2位評(píng)價(jià)員按納入與排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn)獨(dú)芷篩選文獻(xiàn)、提取資料和評(píng)價(jià)納入研究的方法學(xué)質(zhì)量后,采用RevMan5.2軟件進(jìn)行Meta分析。結(jié)果最終納人5個(gè)RCT,共43452例ACS患者。Meta分析結(jié)果顯示:與接受標(biāo)準(zhǔn)氯吡格雷治療相比,新型血小板P2Y12受體抑制劑可有效降低心肌梗死[OR=0.83,95%CI(0.77,0.89),P〈0.00001]、心血管源性死亡[OR=0.86,95%CI(0.78,0.94),P=0.002]和支架內(nèi)血栓形成[OR=0.61,95%CI(0.38,0.97),P=0.04]的發(fā)生率,但不降低卒中[OR=I.06,95%CI(O.88,1.26),P=0.543、顱內(nèi)出血[OR=I.18,95%CI(0.81,1.71),P=0.39]和心肌梗死溶栓后大出血[OR=I.17,95%CI(0.94,1.47),P=0.16]的發(fā)生率。結(jié)論新型血小板P2Y12受體抑制劑治療ACS可有效降低心肌梗死、心血管源性死亡和支架內(nèi)血栓形成事件的發(fā)生率,但與氯吡格雷相比,P2Y12受體抑制劑并不能改善患者卒中和顱內(nèi)出血的臨床結(jié)局。此外,新型血小板P2Y。:受體抑制劑顯著增加了非CABG相關(guān)的出血性并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生率,,對(duì)高危人群的用藥仍需慎重。
Abstr:Objective To systematically review the therapeutic effects and safety of new platelet inhibition regimens targeting P2Y12-receptors (prasugrel/ticagrelor) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods Such data- bases as PubMed (1980 to 2013.7), EMbase (1980 to 2013.5), The Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2013), CBM (1990 to 2013.7), CNKI (1994 to 2013.7), VIP (1989 to 2013.7) and WanFang Data (1980 to 2013.7) were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about comparing prasugrel/ticagrelor with clopidogrel in treating patients with ACS. Two reviewers screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. Re- suits Five studies involving 43 452 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with standard clopidogrel, prasugrel/ticagrelor reduced the incidences of myocardial infarction (OR=0.83, 95%CI 0.77 to 0.89, P〈0.000 01), cardiovascular death (OR=0.86, 95%CI 0.78 to 0.94, P=0.002), and stent thrombosis (OR=0.61, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.97, P=0.04); while no advantage was found in reducing the incidences of stroke (OR=1.06, 95%CI 0.88 to 1.26, P=0.54), intracranial hemorrhage (OR=1.18, 95%CI 0.81 to 1.71, P=0.39), and severe bleeding after thrombolysis due to myocardial infarction (OR=1.17, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.47, P=0.16). Conclusion New platelet inhibition regimens targeting P2Y12-receptors for ACS could effectively decrease the incidences of myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, and stent thrombosis events. However, compared with clopidogrel, it could not improve the clinical outcomes of patients with
文章關(guān)鍵詞:
Keyword::Acute coronary syndrome Prasugrel Ticagrelor Systematic review Meta-analysis Randomized controlled trial
課題項(xiàng)目:廣東省自然科學(xué)基金資助項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):S2012010009326)
本文關(guān)鍵詞:普拉格雷和替格瑞洛治療急性冠脈綜合征的Meta分析,由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。
本文編號(hào):227390
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/xxg/227390.html