慢性肝病住院患者的營養(yǎng)調(diào)查與營養(yǎng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)篩查
[Abstract]:[Objective]
1 a nutritional survey was conducted among hospitalized patients with chronic liver disease to assess their nutritional status and their satisfaction with normal nutritional needs.
2 use NRS2002 to screen nutritional risk for hospitalized patients with chronic liver disease, so as to provide evidence for early detection and treatment of malnutrition.
3 to explore the therapeutic effect of nutritional support on hospitalized patients with chronic liver disease.
[object and method of research]
A total of 217 patients with chronic liver disease in the hepatobiliary and pancreatic Medicine Department of our hospital from July 2013 to October 2013 were enrolled in this study. The clinical data of 217 patients were collected, including sex, age, diagnosis, height, weight, triceps skin fold thickness, upper arm circumference, serum total egg white, albumin, prealbumin, hemoglobin, lymphocyte count, and the total number of patients. Bilirubin, prothrombin time, imaging data (ascites), all patients completed a 24 hour diet review within 24 hours and a NRS2002 score of.24 hour diet regression analysis compared with the standard supply of dietary nutrient reference intake in Chinese residents, combined with anthropometric and laboratory indicators to evaluate patients The nutritional status and the satisfaction degree of normal nutrition needs, analysis of the relationship between nutritional status and etiology, the relationship between the severity of the disease and the.NRS2002 score of more than 3 to determine the nutritional risk, and review the nutritional support of the patients, study the incidence of nutritional risk in the patients with chronic liver disease, the nutritional risk and the cause of disease, the severity of the disease, the liver function Child-Pugh The relationship between grading and clinical factors, as well as the effect of nutritional support on hospitalized patients with chronic liver disease.
[results]
Among the 1217 hospitalized patients with chronic liver disease, malnutrition occurred in 148 patients, and the incidence of malnutrition was 68.20%.
2 the incidence of malnutrition: the elderly non elderly, liver cirrhosis, non liver cirrhosis, autoimmune less than viral and alcoholic, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of dystrophy in different sexes, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of malnutrition in patients with viral and alcoholic chronic liver disease (P0. 05).
The average hospitalization time of 3 dystrophy patients was (14.46 + 7.70) d, the average time of hospitalization (12.01 + 5.45) d for patients with good nutritional status was (12.01 + 5.45), and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05); the clinical outcomes of patients with good nutritional status were better than those with malnutrition, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05).
4 the daily energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, VitA, VitB1, VitB2, nicotinic acid, VitE, sodium, potassium, calcium, and other nutrients in the inpatients of chronic liver disease were all lower than the standard supply of dietary dietary nutrients in Chinese residents, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05).
Among the 5217 hospitalized patients with chronic liver disease, 87 patients had nutritional risk, and the incidence of nutritional risk was 40.09%.
6 the incidence of nutritional risk: the elderly non elderly, liver cirrhosis and liver cirrhosis, non cirrhosis; viral, alcohol higher than autoimmunity; and with the increase of liver function Child-Pugh grade, the difference has statistical significance (P0.05). The incidence of nutritional risk is not statistically significant between sex and the difference between the virus and alcohol There was no statistical significance (P0.05).
The measured values of MAC, TSF, AMC, TP, ALB, Hb, TLC in patients with 7NRS > 3 were respectively (23.39 + 2.77), (10.91 + 5.79), (19.97 + 2.44), (58.33 + 9.07), (26.93 + 6.86), (101.97 + 31.82), P25=6, P50=31, P75=100, and were all lower than those of the patients. The difference was statistically significant.
The average hospitalization time (15.23 + 7.20) d of patients with 8NRS > 3 was longer than that of NRS3 patients (12.65 + 6.94) d, and the clinical outcome was worse than that of NRS3, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05).
The use rate of nutritional support for CLD patients with 9NRS > 3 was 43.68%, all of which were parenteral nutrition. The values of TP, ALB, Hb, TLC after nutritional support were respectively (57.34 + 7.59), (25.8 + 3.96), (93.21 + 22.42), (0.89 + 0.51), PA measurement values P25=13, P50=26.5, P75=64.25, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the change of AMC (P0.05).
The average hospitalization time of 10 patients with nutritional support was (15.45 + 7.42) d, and the average hospitalization time of the patients without nutritional support was (15.06 + 7.09) d. There was no significant difference in the average hospitalization time and clinical outcome between the two groups (P0.05).
[Conclusion]
1 the incidence of malnutrition and the incidence of nutritional risk in patients with chronic liver disease are high, and they are related to age, etiology, severity of disease, hospitalization time and clinical outcome. The nutritional survey and nutritional risk screening should be paid attention to in order to provide the basis for early nutrition support.
2 the daily energy and nutrient intake of hospitalized patients with chronic liver disease are lower than the standard supply of Chinese dietary nutrition reference intake, and nutritional support should be given to patients with malnutrition.
3NRS2002 is simple and easy to operate, and can be used for nutritional risk screening in hospitalized patients with chronic liver disease.
4 nutritional support therapy can improve the laboratory indicators of patients with nutritional risk, and it should be timely and effectively applied to patients with chronic liver disease.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:昆明醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:R575
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條
1 郭迎迎;褚燕君;;營養(yǎng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)篩查2002對(duì)肝硬化患者營養(yǎng)評(píng)估的可行性探討[J];河南醫(yī)學(xué)研究;2011年01期
2 李廣鵬;周黎黎;歐陽偉鋼;拓寬前;李健寧;韓志毅;佐小華;秦蕾;;四種營養(yǎng)評(píng)價(jià)法對(duì)肝硬化患者營養(yǎng)不良評(píng)價(jià)的一致性探討[J];現(xiàn)代生物醫(yī)學(xué)進(jìn)展;2010年05期
3 方仕;麥海妍;盧味;凌文華;卓淑雨;葉艷彬;張常華;詹文華;;住院患者營養(yǎng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)篩查及營養(yǎng)支持狀況[J];中國公共衛(wèi)生;2010年05期
4 陳偉,蔣朱明,張永梅,王秀榮,陳春明,史軼蘩;歐洲營養(yǎng)不良風(fēng)險(xiǎn)調(diào)查方法在中國住院患者的臨床可行性研究[J];中國臨床營養(yǎng)雜志;2005年03期
5 蔣朱明;陳偉;朱賽楠;姚晨;營養(yǎng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及營養(yǎng)支持調(diào)查協(xié)作組;;我國東、中、西部大城市三甲醫(yī)院營養(yǎng)不良(不足)、營養(yǎng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)發(fā)生率及營養(yǎng)支持應(yīng)用狀況調(diào)查[J];中國臨床營養(yǎng)雜志;2008年06期
6 吳欣耘;汪之頊;馬秀玲;王彬彬;范萍;李祖文;;稱重法和24h膳食回顧法用于評(píng)估住院病人一日膳食的比較[J];中國食物與營養(yǎng);2011年12期
7 于淑清;孟慶華;李玉賢;馮巖梅;倪明美;王金環(huán);王欣;;慢性肝炎和肝炎后肝硬化患者能量代謝的研究[J];中華全科醫(yī)師雜志;2007年10期
,本文編號(hào):2147160
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/xiaohjib/2147160.html