【摘要】：目的:探討佩戴不同類型踝關節(jié)護具對功能性踝關節(jié)不穩(wěn)者靜態(tài)姿勢穩(wěn)定性的影響。方法:選取10名男性單側(cè)功能性踝關節(jié)不穩(wěn)者,利用Flexi Force壓力感受系統(tǒng)控制佩戴彈性護具時的踝壓,采用WIN-POD系統(tǒng)分別測量受試者患側(cè)無護具、佩戴彈性護具、佩戴半剛性護具時的靜態(tài)姿勢穩(wěn)定性。結(jié)果:(1)睜眼狀態(tài)下,佩戴彈性護具和半剛性護具時COP動搖各指標與無護具時相比差異均無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。與半剛性護具相比,佩戴彈性護具時X軸平均擺幅顯著增大(P0.05)。(2)閉眼狀態(tài)下,佩戴彈性護具和半剛性護具時COP動搖各指標與無護具時相比差異均無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);佩戴彈性護具與半剛性護具相比,各指標間差異也無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。結(jié)論:佩戴彈性護具和半剛性護具不影響功能性踝關節(jié)不穩(wěn)者的靜態(tài)姿勢穩(wěn)定性,但佩戴半剛性護具時的靜態(tài)姿勢穩(wěn)定性要好于佩戴彈性護具。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the effect of wearing different types of ankle protection on static postural stability of functional ankle instability. Methods: the ankle pressure of 10 male patients with unilateral functional ankle instability was controlled by Flexi Force pressure sensing system. The unprotected side and elastic protection were measured by WIN-POD system. Static posture stability when wearing semi-rigid protective gear. Results: (1) under the condition of open eyes, there was no significant difference between the indexes of COP shaking when wearing elastic and semi-rigid protectors and those without protection (P0.05). Compared with semi-rigid protective gear, the average swing amplitude of X axis increased significantly (P0.05). (2) when wearing elastic protector (P0.05). When wearing elastic and semi-rigid protective gear, there was no significant difference in COP shaking indexes between the two groups (P0.05). There was no significant difference between the two indexes in wearing elastic protective gear and semi-rigid protective gear (P0.05). Conclusion: the static posture stability of the patients with functional ankle instability is not affected by wearing elastic and semi-rigid ones, but the static posture stability is better when wearing semi-rigid protectors than with elastic ones.
【作者單位】： 蘇州大學體育學院;
【分類號】：R684
，

本文編號：2425595