發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-05 12:43

【摘要】：目的探討不同疼痛管理模式對(duì)膝關(guān)節(jié)鏡下行伸膝裝置黏連松解的伸直型膝關(guān)節(jié)僵硬患者術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛效果及療效分析。方法將于2012年1月至2016年9月在廣西醫(yī)科大學(xué)一附院創(chuàng)傷骨科手外科同一治療小組膝關(guān)節(jié)鏡下行伸膝裝置黏連松解術(shù)的41例伸直型膝關(guān)節(jié)僵硬患者按其不同鎮(zhèn)痛模式分為2組,其中將術(shù)后口服塞來(lái)昔布為術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛方案的21膝患者為A組,將術(shù)前口服塞來(lái)昔布及聯(lián)合術(shù)中關(guān)節(jié)腔注射“雞尾酒”多模式疼痛管理為術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛方案的20膝患者為B組,回顧性分析其治療效果,隨訪時(shí)間6個(gè)月,以視覺(jué)疼痛模擬評(píng)分量表(VSA)評(píng)價(jià)患者術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛效果,以膝關(guān)節(jié)屈曲改變角度及外科特種醫(yī)院膝關(guān)節(jié)評(píng)分(HHS)評(píng)估患者術(shù)后1個(gè)月、3個(gè)月、6個(gè)月患膝功能改善情況。結(jié)果1、術(shù)后12小時(shí)、1天、2天,靜息狀態(tài)下,患膝關(guān)節(jié)VAS評(píng)分B組比A組小,P小于0.05,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。術(shù)后3天、4天,靜息狀態(tài)下,患膝關(guān)節(jié)VAS評(píng)分B組與A組大至相當(dāng),P大于0.05,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。2、術(shù)后2天、3天,被動(dòng)活動(dòng)時(shí)患膝關(guān)節(jié)VAS評(píng)分B組比A組小,P小于0.05,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。術(shù)后1周,被動(dòng)活動(dòng)時(shí),患膝關(guān)節(jié)VAS評(píng)分B組與A組大至相當(dāng),P大于0.05,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。3、術(shù)后2天、14天,主動(dòng)活動(dòng)時(shí)患膝關(guān)節(jié)屈曲角度B組比A組大,P小于0.05,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,術(shù)后1個(gè)月、3個(gè)月、6個(gè)月,主動(dòng)活動(dòng)時(shí),B組與A組屈曲角度大至相當(dāng),P大于0.05,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。4、A組術(shù)前、術(shù)后HHS膝關(guān)節(jié)功能評(píng)分比較P小于0.01,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。B組術(shù)前、術(shù)后HHS膝關(guān)節(jié)功能評(píng)分比較P小于0.01,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。結(jié)論在關(guān)節(jié)鏡行伸膝裝置黏連松解術(shù)的伸直型膝關(guān)節(jié)僵硬患者,采用多模式疼痛管理能明顯減輕患者術(shù)后48h的疼痛程度,提高總體滿意度且能明顯改善在關(guān)節(jié)鏡行伸膝裝置黏連松解術(shù)的伸直型膝關(guān)節(jié)僵硬患者術(shù)后2d、14d的膝關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)度(ROM),增加患者康復(fù)的信心。但對(duì)1、3、6個(gè)月后膝關(guān)節(jié)主動(dòng)活動(dòng)度及HHS膝關(guān)節(jié)功能評(píng)分無(wú)改善。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the analgesic effect and curative effect of different pain management models in patients with extensional knee joint stiffness under knee arthroscopy. Methods from January 2012 to September 2016, 41 patients with ankylosis were divided into two groups according to their different analgesic modes. Among them, 21 knee patients who took celecoxib as postoperative analgesic regimen were selected as group A, and 20 knee patients who were treated with preoperative oral celecoxib and intraoperative "cocktail" multi-mode pain management as postoperative analgesic regimen were selected as group B. The therapeutic effect was analyzed retrospectively and followed up for 6 months. The postoperative analgesic effect was evaluated by visual pain analogue scale (VSA). Knee function improvement was evaluated 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after operation by knee flexion angle and knee joint score (HHS) in special surgery hospital. Results 1. At 12 hours, 1 day, 2 days after operation, the VAS score of knee joint in group B was smaller than that in group A (P < 0.05). The VAS score of knee joint in group B was as large as that in group A (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between group B and group A (P > 0.05). 2, 2 days and 3 days after operation, the VAS score of knee joint in group B was smaller than that in group A. P < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant. At 1 week after operation, the VAS score of knee joint in group B was as large as that in group A (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between group B and group A (P > 0.05). 2 and 14 days after operation, the flexion angle of knee joint in group B was larger than that in group A. P < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant. After 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after operation, the flexion angle of group B and group A was equal to that of group A. there was no significant difference between group A and group A before operation. Postoperative HHS knee joint function score P < 0.01, the difference was statistically significant, group B before and after HHS knee joint function score P < 0.01, the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Multi-mode pain management can significantly reduce the degree of pain 48 hours after arthroscopy in patients with extensional knee stiffness treated with knee extension device and loosening. Increasing overall satisfaction and significantly improving the (ROM), of knee motion in patients with extensional knee stiffness treated with arthroscopic extension device and loosening increased the patients' confidence in rehabilitation. But there was no improvement in knee active motion and HHS knee function score after 1: 3 and 6 months.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：R687.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孔祥朋;任鵬;倪明;李想;陳繼營(yíng);柴偉;;全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)中三階段關(guān)節(jié)腔周?chē)⑸潆u尾酒與股神經(jīng)阻滯鎮(zhèn)痛效果的比較[J];中國(guó)骨與關(guān)節(jié)雜志;2016年10期

2 花奇凱;吳鴻彬;冼呈;趙良軍;李巍;趙勁民;;關(guān)節(jié)鏡下治療創(chuàng)傷后膝關(guān)節(jié)僵硬26例[J];廣西醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期

3 趙新文;李釗;姬振偉;王志學(xué);丁勇;;序貫性手術(shù)治療Ⅰ型膝關(guān)節(jié)僵直的臨床療效分析[J];中國(guó)骨與關(guān)節(jié)損傷雜志;2015年08期

4 陳大康;程智濤;;關(guān)節(jié)鏡輔助下聯(lián)合小切口松解治療膝關(guān)節(jié)僵直的療效分析[J];創(chuàng)傷外科雜志;2014年06期

5 夏小萍;朱蓓蓓;梁櫻;馬正良;韓克;朱湘紅;湯小秋;;右美托咪定靜脈輸注聯(lián)合羅哌卡因局部浸潤(rùn)在腹腔鏡婦科手術(shù)鎮(zhèn)痛的效果[J];臨床麻醉學(xué)雜志;2014年10期

6 馮建來(lái);趙艷玲;閆洪濤;支世保;;關(guān)節(jié)鏡下治療膝關(guān)節(jié)僵直的療效觀察[J];中國(guó)療養(yǎng)醫(yī)學(xué);2013年02期

7 秦國(guó)斌;;關(guān)節(jié)鏡輔助松解治療膝關(guān)節(jié)僵硬116列臨床分析[J];中國(guó)內(nèi)鏡雜志;2012年03期

8 崔志剛;劉四海;薛祖軍;韓新祚;馮建璞;劉克敏;;膝關(guān)節(jié)周?chē)煌课还钦壑孪リP(guān)節(jié)僵直特點(diǎn)分析及早期康復(fù)療效[J];中國(guó)康復(fù)理論與實(shí)踐;2010年11期

9 王建華;趙金忠;何耀華;皇甫小橋;袁峰;彭曉春;;嚴(yán)重膝關(guān)節(jié)伸直攣縮的微創(chuàng)治療[J];中華骨科雜志;2006年05期

10 許建波,王戰(zhàn)朝;創(chuàng)傷后膝關(guān)節(jié)僵硬與股四頭肌成形術(shù)及其功能鍛煉[J];中國(guó)臨床康復(fù);2005年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2312124