【摘要】：目的:分析面部注射填充物填充后導(dǎo)致的各類型并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生率,以及采用小切口探取法取出注射物的臨床療效。材料和方法:2015年3月至2017年2月因注射填充注射物出現(xiàn)并發(fā)癥而于我院就診尋求診療的患者共167例,186個(gè)部位。均曾于非醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)或私下甚至私自面部注射,因注射后導(dǎo)致并發(fā)癥就診于我院。本文分析匯總各并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生率,除血栓栓塞患者外,均采用局麻下小切口探取法直接取出注射物,采用卡方檢驗(yàn)比較鼻部及頦部注射物取出術(shù)后不放假體與同時(shí)放假體在術(shù)后并發(fā)癥上的差異。結(jié)果:2015年3月至2017年2月因注射填充注射物出現(xiàn)并發(fā)癥而于我院就診尋求診療的患者共167人,186個(gè)部位。其中因注射填充后出現(xiàn)形態(tài)不佳就診患者120人,139個(gè)部位。主訴鼻部形態(tài)不佳100例,其中63例行鼻注射物取出術(shù)并同期行假體隆鼻術(shù),術(shù)后兩周并發(fā)癥7例(11.1%)。37例單純行鼻注射物取出術(shù)暫時(shí)未置放假體,術(shù)后兩周并發(fā)癥2例(5.4%)。兩組兩周后并發(fā)癥病例數(shù)經(jīng)卡方檢驗(yàn),0.5p0.75,不存在統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異。主訴頦部形態(tài)不佳39例,其中9例行頦部注射物取出術(shù)后同期行假體隆頦術(shù),術(shù)后兩周均未發(fā)現(xiàn)并發(fā)癥。30例單純行頦部注射物取出術(shù)暫時(shí)未置放假體,術(shù)后兩周并發(fā)癥3例(10%)。兩組兩周后并發(fā)癥病例數(shù)經(jīng)卡方檢驗(yàn),0.25p0.5,不存在統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異。因局部感染就診11例,均行面部注射物取出術(shù),均未同期置放假體。術(shù)后兩周并發(fā)癥2例(18.2%)。因局部炎癥反應(yīng)就診5例,均行面部注射物取出術(shù),未同期置放假體,術(shù)后均無兩周并發(fā)癥。因局部隆起就診22例,均行面部注射物取出術(shù),其中3例鼻部同期行假體隆鼻術(shù),術(shù)后兩周并發(fā)癥2例(9.1%)。因注射物遷移游走就診7例,均行面部注射物取出術(shù),術(shù)后并發(fā)癥1例(14.3%)。因血管栓塞就診2例,均予以PVP外用抗炎,服用擴(kuò)血管藥物治療,兩周后均預(yù)后良好。結(jié)論:面部注射填充物最常見的并發(fā)癥為形態(tài)不佳,其次為局部隆起,局部感染,注射物遷移游走及局部炎癥反應(yīng),血管栓塞的發(fā)生率最低。鼻部與頦部注射物取出術(shù)后同期行假體植入術(shù)與單純行注射物取出術(shù)在術(shù)后兩周并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率上也不存在顯著差異。面部小切口探取法可推薦作為處理填充注射后的各類并發(fā)癥的處理方法。
[Abstract]:Objective: to analyze the incidence of various kinds of complications caused by facial injection filling and the clinical effect of small incision extraction. Materials and methods: from March 2015 to February 2017 167 patients with 186 sites were treated in our hospital because of complications caused by injection filling. They have been injected in non-medical institutions, privately or even privately, and have been treated in our hospital because of complications caused by injection. The incidence of complications was analyzed and summarized. Except for thromboembolism patients, the injection was removed directly by small incision under local anesthesia. Chi-square test was used to compare the difference of postoperative complications between non-holiday body and simultaneous holiday body after nasal and mental injection removal. Results: from March 2015 to February 2017, 167 patients (186 sites) were treated in our hospital because of complications caused by injection filling. Among them, 120 patients, 139 parts of them, had poor appearance after injection and filling. There were 100 cases of nasal malformation, of which 63 cases were treated with nasal injection removal and prosthetic augmentation rhinoplasty at the same time. Complications occurred in 7 cases (11.1%) in two weeks after operation. 37 cases had no prosthesis after nasal injection removal only, and 2 cases (5.4%) had complications two weeks after operation. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the number of complications after two weeks after chi-square test (0.5 p 0.75). 39 cases complained of mental disfigurement, of which 9 cases were treated with prosthetic prosthesis protuberance after chin injection removal. No complications were found in all 30 cases after two weeks. The complications were 10% in 3 cases (10%) two weeks after operation, and 3 cases (10%) were complicated two weeks after operation. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the number of complications after two weeks after chi-square test (0.25 p0.5). 11 patients with local infection were treated with facial injection removal and prosthesis was not implanted at the same time. Two weeks after operation, 2 cases (18.2%) had complications. 5 cases were treated with local inflammatory reaction, all of them were treated with facial injection removal, without simultaneous implantation of prosthesis, and no complications were found after two weeks of operation. 22 cases were treated with local protuberance, all of them were treated with facial injection removal, of which 3 cases underwent nasal prosthesis augmentation rhinoplasty simultaneously. Complications occurred in 2 cases (9.1%) two weeks after operation. 7 cases were treated by injection migration, all of them were treated with facial injection removal. The postoperative complications were 14.3% (1 / 7). Two patients with vascular embolism were treated with PVP for external use and vasodilators. The prognosis was good after two weeks. Conclusion: the most common complication of facial injection filling is poor morphology, followed by local protuberance, local infection, injection migration and local inflammatory reaction, and the lowest incidence of vascular embolism. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications two weeks after nasal and mental injection removal with prosthesis implantation and simple injection removal. Facial small incision detection can be recommended as a management method for various complications after filling injection.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R622

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊恰佳;彭曉茹;姜海洋;呂華;曾瑜華;楊柳;;聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠注射隆乳物取出術(shù)相關(guān)問題探討[J];中國美容醫(yī)學(xué);2007年06期

2 小米;晏紫;;修復(fù)+重塑 給下巴一個(gè)完美未來[J];醫(yī)學(xué)美學(xué)美容;2008年10期

3 李天石;胡華新;劉學(xué)軍;莊禮大;;聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠注射隆胸并發(fā)癥的處理體會[J];齊齊哈爾醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年07期

4 米希婷;谷廷敏;米亞英;齊永樂;汪江濤;;奧美定注射隆乳術(shù)后注射物取出同期假體隆乳術(shù)效果觀察[J];中國美容醫(yī)學(xué);2013年10期

5 楊登文;肖敏勤;;注射美容的應(yīng)用和發(fā)展趨勢[J];中國傷殘醫(yī)學(xué);2014年02期

6 林軍;歐陽天祥;肖燕;陳惠平;虞杰;;影像學(xué)檢查在聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠注射隆胸并發(fā)癥診治中的應(yīng)用及意義[J];中國美容醫(yī)學(xué);2006年03期

7 岳潁;欒杰;喬群;穆蘭花;;聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠注射隆乳術(shù)后取出方法探討[J];中國美容醫(yī)學(xué);2008年06期

8 胡華新,劉學(xué)軍,朱輝,龔連梅,李震;聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠注射隆乳不良反應(yīng)的臨床觀察[J];中華整形外科雜志;2002年02期

9 孫衍峰;王冠天;盧立春;李巍;樸紅鷹;鐘書強(qiáng);于景臣;;嚴(yán)格清創(chuàng)聯(lián)合負(fù)壓封閉引流技術(shù)治療手部高壓注射傷6例臨床觀察[J];吉林大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2013年01期

10 方明松;席慶春;李旋;曹林;;聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠取出后不同時(shí)期再次隆鼻的比較研究[J];齊齊哈爾醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年10期

相關(guān)會議論文 前8條

1 李比;夏有辰;張潔;朱力;尤維濤;劉溢;;聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠注射隆乳后無癥狀患者的處理策略[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會整形外科學(xué)分會第十一次全國會議、中國人民解放軍整形外科學(xué)專業(yè)委員會學(xué)術(shù)交流會、中國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合學(xué)會醫(yī)學(xué)美容專業(yè)委員會全國會議論文集[C];2011年

2 李比;夏有辰;張潔;朱力;尤維濤;劉溢;;聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠注射隆乳后無癥狀患者的處理策略[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會整形外科學(xué)分會第十一次全國會議、中國人民解放軍整形外科學(xué)專業(yè)委員會學(xué)術(shù)交流會、中國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合學(xué)會醫(yī)學(xué)美容專業(yè)委員會全國會議論文集[C];2011年

3 邵宏;劉鴻雷;金童;;注射隆胸術(shù)后注射物取出同期行假體隆胸術(shù)[A];2012全國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合醫(yī)學(xué)美容學(xué)術(shù)交流大會論文匯編[C];2012年

4 陳德裕;;微整形注射美容并發(fā)癥 摘要[A];2013年全國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合醫(yī)學(xué)美容學(xué)術(shù)交流大會論文匯編[C];2013年

5 于立民;;聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠隆乳后注射物取出同時(shí)假體置入隆乳[A];醫(yī)用聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠（奧美定）論文匯編（第二輯）[C];2002年

6 胡華新;劉學(xué)軍;朱輝;龔連梅;李震;;聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠注射隆乳不良反應(yīng)的臨床觀察[A];醫(yī)用聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠（奧美定）論文匯編（第二輯）[C];2002年

7 嚴(yán)晟;吳溯帆;吳華;;注射美容并發(fā)癥——原因及處理[A];2011年浙江省整形美容學(xué)術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2011年

8 王歷;方克明;王景濤;張繼偉;李云橋;;聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠注射隆胸取出假體植入乳房重塑術(shù)[A];2007年中國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合醫(yī)學(xué)美容學(xué)術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2007年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條

1 湖南省婦幼保健院 陳杏初;抽吸豐胸注射物不可取[N];大眾衛(wèi)生報(bào);2006年

2 本報(bào)記者　李穎　實(shí)習(xí)生　蔣秀娟;注射隆胸者要學(xué)會自查[N];科技日報(bào);2006年

3 記者 黎昌政;豐胸“求美”，求來永遠(yuǎn)的“痛”[N];新華每日電訊;2004年

4 趙雯;注射隆胸失敗怎么辦[N];中國中醫(yī)藥報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 魏海浪;聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠注射隆乳術(shù)后注射物取出并同期乳房重塑的臨床研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2016年

2 熊麗嬋;聚丙烯酰胺隆乳并發(fā)癥及注射物取出術(shù)式的探討[D];廣西醫(yī)科大學(xué);2009年

3 陳乙禎;聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠（PAAG）注射物取出一期或二期行硅膠假體隆鼻術(shù)的臨床觀察[D];浙江大學(xué);2015年

4 任爽;聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠注射隆乳術(shù)后并發(fā)癥35例分析[D];大連醫(yī)科大學(xué);2009年

5 路程;聚丙烯酰胺（PAHG）注射隆乳術(shù)后的回顧性分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年

6 習(xí)婭琦;聚丙烯酰胺水凝膠注射隆乳遠(yuǎn)期組織學(xué)與磁共振成像研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2243882