膝關(guān)節(jié)單髁置換術(shù)脛骨假體術(shù)前定位的臨床研究
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the accurate localization of tibial prosthesis in single condyle replacement of knee joint and its influence on clinical efficacy. [methods] from June 2014 to December 2014, 116 patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee joint were randomly divided into two groups, 60 knees in the preoperative localization group and 56 knees in the traditional operation group. In the preoperative localization group, the tibial plateau osteotomy was performed by adjusting the coronal plane of the tibial osteotomy guide bar parallel to the tibial crest and distance from the distal side of the sagittal plane to the skin 1.80cm. In other words, tibial plateau osteotomy is performed by tibial guiding device parallel to the long axis of tibia in both planes. The posterior tilt angle (TCPSA) and HSS score of tibial prosthesis (TCVA), were measured and compared between the two groups. [results] the mean postoperative follow-up was 12 months. The tibial prosthesis extraversion angles were (0.92 鹵1.81) 擄and (1.61 鹵2.51) 擄(t _ (-1.072) P _ (0.288) in the preoperative localization group and (7.32 鹵1.73) 擄(t ~ (-1.081) P _ (0.284) 擄in the traditional operation group, respectively. The tibial prosthesis retroversion angle was (6.91 鹵0.85) 擄and (7.32 鹵1.73) 擄(t ~ (-1.081) P ~ (0.284), respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups. However, the tibial prosthesis in the preoperative positioning group was closer to 0 擄and 7 擄, and the dispersion was smaller and more accurate. There was no significant difference in HSS score between the two groups before operation, 2 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after operation (P0.05). Conclusion: the preoperative localization method used in this study can improve the accuracy of tibial prosthesis localization after monondylar replacement, and obtain satisfactory clinical results.
【作者單位】: 上海同濟(jì)大學(xué)附屬楊浦醫(yī)院;
【基金】:上海市衛(wèi)生局重大科研項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):2013040) 上海市科委引導(dǎo)類項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):13411961400)
【分類號(hào)】:R687.4
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 涂意輝;馬童;薛華明;劉曉東;蔡珉巍;;第三代牛津單髁系統(tǒng)在膝關(guān)節(jié)內(nèi)側(cè)間室骨性關(guān)節(jié)炎的應(yīng)用[J];生物骨科材料與臨床研究;2013年03期
2 涂意輝;薛華明;蔡珉巍;劉曉東;;微創(chuàng)單髁置換術(shù)治療膝內(nèi)側(cè)間室骨性關(guān)節(jié)炎的早期并發(fā)癥[J];中國(guó)矯形外科雜志;2011年17期
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條
1 楊濤;薛華明;馬童;文濤;張穎川;涂意輝;;膝關(guān)節(jié)單髁置換術(shù)脛骨假體術(shù)前定位的臨床研究[J];中國(guó)矯形外科雜志;2017年07期
2 文濤;薛華明;馬童;涂意輝;;氨甲環(huán)酸對(duì)減少單髁置換術(shù)后出血量的效果評(píng)價(jià)[J];生物骨科材料與臨床研究;2016年05期
3 羅學(xué)輝;謝學(xué)文;曾文磊;林潔;;關(guān)節(jié)鏡下有限清理術(shù)配合傷科黃水外敷治療膝骨性關(guān)節(jié)炎的效果[J];廣東醫(yī)學(xué);2016年07期
4 曾昭池;郭立新;朱志勇;吳開元;湯勇;張先慧;;單髁置換術(shù)和全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)的療效比較的調(diào)查研究[J];中國(guó)衛(wèi)生產(chǎn)業(yè);2015年21期
5 周秉正;白倫浩;李彬;王廣斌;;單髁置換與全膝置換:假體接觸表面的應(yīng)力分析[J];中國(guó)組織工程研究;2015年22期
6 徐明;惠文鵬;王冰;孫海寧;于秀淳;;114例單髁膝關(guān)節(jié)置換中期療效及其與學(xué)習(xí)曲線的關(guān)系[J];生物骨科材料與臨床研究;2015年02期
7 涂意輝;薛華明;馬童;劉曉東;蔡珉巍;張長(zhǎng)青;;優(yōu)化底物酶及凍存劑組成對(duì)軟骨細(xì)胞增殖力及活力的影響[J];中國(guó)矯形外科雜志;2012年13期
8 馬云淼;高志洋;劉鐵民;;OxfordⅢ單髁系統(tǒng)治療膝關(guān)節(jié)內(nèi)側(cè)間室退變的中遠(yuǎn)期療效[J];河北醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期
【二級(jí)參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 涂意輝;馬童;薛華明;蔡珉巍;劉曉東;;非股骨髓腔定位法牛津單髁膝關(guān)節(jié)置換可行性研究[J];中華外科雜志;2012年08期
2 涂意輝;薛華明;蔡珉巍;劉曉東;馬童;張長(zhǎng)青;;股骨髓外定位法微創(chuàng)單髁置換術(shù)治療膝內(nèi)側(cè)間室骨關(guān)節(jié)炎[J];中華關(guān)節(jié)外科雜志(電子版);2011年06期
3 劉曉東;Q靡饣,
本文編號(hào):2226122
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2226122.html