本文選題：巨大腰椎間盤突出 + 經(jīng)皮內鏡下腰椎間盤髓核摘除術　； 參考：《重慶醫(yī)科大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的:探討經(jīng)皮內鏡下腰椎間盤髓核摘除術(Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy,PELD)聯(lián)合微創(chuàng)通道PEEK半剛性固定棒非融合固定技術治療巨大腰椎間盤突出(Huge lumbar disc herniation,HLDH)的可行性、安全性及初步臨床療效。方法:納入2014年6月--2015年10月HLDH患者共21例,并全部給予PELD聯(lián)合微創(chuàng)通道PEEK半剛性固定棒非融合固定術治療。術前及術后各時間點的腰腿和腿痛視覺模擬評分(Visual analog scale,VAS)被記錄,術前及末次隨訪Oswestry功能障礙指數(shù)評分(Oswestry disability index,ODI)、末次改良Mac Nab療效評定標準被記錄。結果:21例患者均全部成功完成手術。平均手術時間為189.8±50.6min。平均術中失血量為102.4±88.7 ml。平均住院時間為9±3.1 d。隨訪7月~22月,平均13±4.1月。與術前相較,術后3月、6月及末次腰痛VAS評分改善明顯。與術前相較,術后第1天、1月、3月、6月及末次腿痛VAS評分改善明顯。與術前相較,術后第1天腰痛VAS評分有所增加。與術前相較,術后1月腰痛VAS評分統(tǒng)計學下無明顯差異。與術前相較,末次隨訪ODI評分較術前有明顯改善。末次改良Mac Nab療效評定標準:優(yōu)18例,良2例,可1例。末次隨訪時無患者復發(fā)。結論:通過對PELD聯(lián)合微創(chuàng)通道PEEK半剛性固定棒非融合固定術治療HLDH的初步分析,該手術在技術上是安全可行的,有著令人滿意的短期臨床療效。但由于隨訪時間偏短且缺少與傳統(tǒng)標準融合固定等手術方式的對比,該技術遠期療效有待更進一步的深入的研究。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the feasibility, safety and preliminary clinical effect of percutaneous endoscopic discectomy of endoscopic lumbar discectomyn (PELDD) combined with minimally invasive channel PEEK semi-rigid rod nonfusion fixation in the treatment of giant lumbar disc herniation. Methods: a total of 21 patients with HLDH from June 2014 to October 2015 were enrolled and all were treated with PELD combined with minimally invasive channel PEEK semi-rigid fixed rod non-fusion fixation. Visual analog scale was recorded at all time points before and after operation. Oswestry disability index was evaluated before and at the last follow-up, and the last modified Mac Nab evaluation standard was recorded. Results all 21 cases were successfully operated. The mean operative time was 189.8 鹵50.6 min. The average intraoperative blood loss was 102.4 鹵88.7 ml. The average hospitalization time was 9 鹵3.1 days. The follow-up ranged from 7 months to 22 months, with an average of 13 鹵4.1 months. Compared with preoperative, the VAS scores of 3 months, 6 months and the last time of low back pain improved significantly. The VAS scores of leg pain on the first day, one month, three months, six months and the last time after operation were significantly improved compared with those before operation. Compared with preoperative, the VAS score of low back pain increased on the first day after operation. There was no significant difference in VAS score of low back pain between before and after operation. The ODI score of the last follow-up was significantly improved compared with that before operation. The last modified Mac Nab evaluation criteria were excellent in 18 cases, good in 2 cases and fair in 1 case. No recurrence occurred at the last follow-up. Conclusion: through the preliminary analysis of PELD combined with minimally invasive PEEK semi-rigid fixed rod non-fusion fixation for HLDH, the operation is technically safe and feasible, and has a satisfactory short-term clinical effect. However, due to the short follow-up time and the lack of comparison with the traditional standard fusion and fixation, the long-term effect of this technique needs further in-depth study.
【學位授予單位】：重慶醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R687.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 江曉航;盧峰;;椎間孔鏡技術在脊柱結核膿腫診療中的應用[J];中國微侵襲神經(jīng)外科雜志;2017年01期

2 韓立強;江漢;田永剛;肖聯(lián)平;江毅;;經(jīng)皮椎間孔鏡技術結合工作通道分步置入法治療巨大型腰椎間盤突出的短期療效[J];實用醫(yī)學雜志;2016年14期

3 蔣毅;吳磊;左如俊;石巖;宋華偉;黃承;王藝偉;;經(jīng)皮椎間孔及椎板間聯(lián)合入路內窺鏡下行腰椎管狹窄減壓術的初步報告[J];中國脊柱脊髓雜志;2016年05期

4 吳志強;劉聯(lián)群;陳長賢;王漢龍;林小明;劉春華;;經(jīng)皮TESSYS技術治療巨大型腰椎間盤突出癥的療效分析[J];中國骨與關節(jié)損傷雜志;2015年11期

5 李軍;付強;;經(jīng)皮內鏡椎板間入路治療鈣化型腰椎間盤突出癥早期臨床療效分析[J];中國骨與關節(jié)雜志;2014年08期

6 朱卉敏;張鍇;王衡;郭新軍;劉英杰;單朝;;椎間孔鏡聯(lián)合經(jīng)皮微創(chuàng)棘突間動態(tài)固定治療腰椎間盤突出癥的短期療效[J];中國矯形外科雜志;2013年11期

7 鄭文杰;周躍;王建;李長青;張正豐;王衛(wèi)東;潘勇;;經(jīng)皮椎間孔入路內鏡下治療極外側型腰椎間盤突出癥[J];中國骨與關節(jié)雜志;2013年04期

8 李長青;周躍;王建;初同偉;張正豐;鄭文杰;羅剛;;經(jīng)皮椎間孔內窺鏡下靶向穿刺椎間盤切除術治療腰椎間盤突出癥[J];中國脊柱脊髓雜志;2013年03期

9 李振宙;侯樹勛;商衛(wèi)林;宋科冉;吳聞文;;內窺鏡下脊神經(jīng)背內側支切斷術治療腰椎關節(jié)突關節(jié)源性慢性腰痛[J];中國脊柱脊髓雜志;2013年03期

10 王洪偉;李長青;周躍;;腰椎間盤突出癥疼痛發(fā)生機制的研究進展[J];中國矯形外科雜志;2011年07期

，

本文編號：1957105