本文選題：達芬奇手術(shù)器械　切入點：壓力蒸汽槍　出處：《中國消毒學(xué)雜志》2017年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：目的探討不同清洗方法對達芬奇手術(shù)器械上污染物的去除效果。方法將泌尿外科達芬奇手術(shù)器械分為2組,對照組按照2004版《內(nèi)鏡清洗消毒技術(shù)操作規(guī)范》《達芬奇機器人廠家說明書》進行清洗;試驗組在對照組的基礎(chǔ)上加入壓力蒸汽槍進行處理。采用目測、帶光源放大鏡和ATP對器械進行清洗質(zhì)量檢測。結(jié)果用目測法檢測試驗組和對照組合格率分別為100.00%和95.56%;放大鏡法檢測試驗組和對照組合格率分別為97.50%和88.89%;ATP法檢測試驗組和對照組合格率分別為92.50%和80.00%。試驗組合格率與對照組比較,具有顯著統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.01)。結(jié)論壓力蒸汽槍能夠有效去除器械殘留物,提高達芬奇手術(shù)器械的清洗合格率。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the effect of different cleaning methods on the removal of pollutants from Da Vinci surgical instruments. Methods Urological Da Vinci surgical instruments were divided into two groups. The control group was cleaned according to "Endoscopic cleaning and Disinfection Technical Specification" (2004 edition), "Leonardo da Vinci Robotics Manual", and the test group was treated by adding pressure steam gun on the basis of the control group. Results the qualified rates of the test group and the control group were 100.00% and 95.56 respectively, and the qualified rates of the test group and the control group were 97.50% and 88.89% respectively. The qualified rates of the test group and the control group were 92.50% and 80.00.Compared with the control group, the qualified rate of the test group was higher than that of the control group. Conclusion the pressure steam gun can effectively remove the residue of the instrument and improve the qualified rate of the cleaning of Da Vinci's surgical instruments.
【作者單位】： 上海長海醫(yī)院;
【分類號】：R613

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 陳亞慧;;解密“達芬奇”[J];中國醫(yī)院院長;2010年14期

2 王先進;鐘山;沈周俊;;機器人手術(shù)的經(jīng)濟學(xué)探討[J];上海醫(yī)學(xué);2011年01期

3 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前4條

1 陳新建　毛劍秋;“達芬奇”機器人主刀高難手術(shù)[N];解放軍報;2010年

2 彭雪征　莫鵬;二炮總醫(yī)院擴展“達芬奇”治療領(lǐng)域[N];中國醫(yī)藥報;2009年

3 劉艷杰 劉彩樺;外科手術(shù)邁入機器人時代[N];光明日報;2014年

4 記者 蕭景丹　通訊員 彭雪征 莫鵬;“達芬奇”進入我國肝膽外科領(lǐng)域[N];健康報;2009年

，

本文編號：1606760