本文關(guān)鍵詞： 肘關(guān)節(jié)僵硬 骨傷洗劑 手術(shù)松解 中藥熏洗　出處：《廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目的：探討骨傷洗劑在肘關(guān)節(jié)僵硬松解術(shù)后應(yīng)用的臨床療效,為臨床上優(yōu)化治療方案提供建議,以進(jìn)一步指導(dǎo)臨床應(yīng)用。方法：將2005年8月-2014年8月廣東省中醫(yī)院(除外珠海分院)符合納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn)且無(wú)排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的肘關(guān)節(jié)僵硬的住院患者40例按照不同病例前后對(duì)照的研究方案分為A、B兩組,其中A組-骨傷洗劑組(21例,2012年9月-2014年8月),B組-歷史對(duì)照組(19例,2005年8月-2012年9月)。入院后行切開(kāi)松解術(shù),術(shù)后均予以吲哚美辛25mg tid,患肢冰敷24小時(shí),術(shù)后48h拔引流,開(kāi)始CPM機(jī)鍛煉,2次/天,早晚各1次,每次30分鐘,同時(shí)開(kāi)始等長(zhǎng)訓(xùn)練3次/天,每次持續(xù)約30分鐘。術(shù)后2周傷口Ⅰ期愈合后,停止CPM, A組(骨傷洗劑組)開(kāi)始用骨傷洗劑熏洗肘關(guān)節(jié),在熏洗過(guò)程中患者主動(dòng)作肘關(guān)節(jié)屈伸活動(dòng)(每日3次,分早、中、晚,每次約30分鐘)；B組(對(duì)照組)僅有作肘關(guān)節(jié)主動(dòng)屈伸活動(dòng)(每日3次,分早、中、晚,每次約30分鐘)。收集各組術(shù)前臨床資料,觀察指標(biāo)：1)消腫程度；2)疼痛強(qiáng)度；3)肘關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)度；4)尺神經(jīng)的癥狀；5)肘關(guān)節(jié)功能MAYO評(píng)分。測(cè)量術(shù)后第3天、術(shù)后4周患肘最大周徑,并計(jì)算出消腫指數(shù),評(píng)價(jià)其消腫程度；用VAS法記錄術(shù)前,術(shù)后第2周、4周、6周和術(shù)后第6個(gè)月的疼痛強(qiáng)度；記錄術(shù)前,術(shù)后第2周、4周、6周和術(shù)后第6個(gè)月患肘的活動(dòng)度；分別于術(shù)前和術(shù)后2周、4周、6周和術(shù)后第6個(gè)月評(píng)定尺神經(jīng)的癥狀；分別于術(shù)前和術(shù)后2周、4周、6周和術(shù)后第6個(gè)月A、B兩組評(píng)定肘關(guān)節(jié)功能MAYO評(píng)分；術(shù)前及術(shù)后,術(shù)后1個(gè)月,3個(gè)月,6個(gè)月等復(fù)查X線影像進(jìn)行安全性評(píng)定,得出兩組術(shù)后半年的優(yōu)良率。以上數(shù)據(jù)均用SPSS 17.0統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理,對(duì)比分析兩組之間的差異性。結(jié)果：1.隨訪6個(gè)月,40例獲得隨訪,其中：A組：21例,B組：19例；6例失訪。所有患者均無(wú)藥物過(guò)敏及其他不良反應(yīng)；2.一般資料比較：兩組術(shù)前各項(xiàng)數(shù)值比較均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),具有可比性；3.兩組的比較結(jié)果：消腫療效在術(shù)后4周兩組比較有顯著差異(P0.05)；疼痛強(qiáng)度和肘關(guān)節(jié)評(píng)分方面,兩組患者分別在術(shù)后2周比較無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),術(shù)后4周,6周,6個(gè)月兩組相比有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.01),兩組數(shù)據(jù)有非常顯著差異,肘關(guān)節(jié)功能評(píng)定優(yōu)良率均大于對(duì)照組；肘關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)度改善方面,A組-骨傷洗劑組的隨時(shí)間增大的幅度大于B組,術(shù)后4周,6周,6個(gè)月兩組相比較均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.01),有非常顯著的差異；尺神經(jīng)的癥狀改善方面,兩組數(shù)據(jù)在術(shù)后各時(shí)間點(diǎn)比較均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)；術(shù)后6個(gè)月兩組患者療效判定的優(yōu)良率：A組-骨傷洗劑組(85.72%)B組-治療對(duì)照組(15.79%),兩組比較有非常顯著差異(P0.01),所有患者均無(wú)藥物過(guò)敏及其它不良反應(yīng)。結(jié)論：骨傷洗劑組較單純的功能鍛煉組對(duì)促進(jìn)肘關(guān)節(jié)僵硬松解術(shù)后肘關(guān)節(jié)消腫、止痛、增加活動(dòng)度方面及功能康復(fù)方面有療效。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the clinical effect of bone injury lotion in the treatment of elbow joint stiffness release, and to provide suggestions for clinical optimization of treatment. Methods: Guangdong Provincial Hospital of traditional Chinese Medicine (except Zhuhai Branch) from August 2005 to August 2014. Forty inpatients with stiff elbow joints who met the inclusion criteria and were not excluded were divided into two groups according to the pre-and post-contrast study. There were 21 cases in group A and 19 cases in group B from September 2012 to August 2014. From August 2005 to September 2012, the patients were treated with indomethacin 25mg tid, the affected limbs were frozen for 24 hours, and the drainage was removed 48 hours after operation. The CPM machine began to exercise twice a day, once in the morning and evening for 30 minutes each, and at the same time, 3 times a day for about 30 minutes each time. After 2 weeks of wound healing, CPM was stopped. In group A (bone injury lotion group), the elbow joint was fumigated with bone injury lotion, and the elbow flexion and extension activities were performed during the fumigation (3 times a day, early, middle, late, about 30 minutes each time). Group B (control group) had only active elbow flexion and extension (3 times a day, early, middle, late, about 30 minutes each time). 2) pain intensity; 3) elbow motion; 4) symptoms of ulnar nerve; 5) MAYO score of elbow joint function. The maximal circumference diameter of elbow was measured on the 3rd day and 4th week after operation, and the detumescence index was calculated to evaluate the degree of deswelling. The pain intensity was recorded by VAS method before operation, 2 weeks after operation, 4 weeks and 6 weeks and 6 months after operation. The movement of elbow was recorded before operation, 2 weeks after operation, 4 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months after operation. The symptoms of ulnar nerve were evaluated before and 2 weeks and 6 weeks and 6 months after operation respectively. The MAYO score of elbow joint function was assessed in group A and B before and 2 weeks after operation and 6 weeks after operation and 6 months after operation. Before and after operation, the safety of X-ray images was evaluated 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after operation. All the above data were statistically processed by SPSS 17.0 statistical software, and the differences between the two groups were analyzed. Results: 1. Follow up for 6 months. 40 cases were followed up, including 21 cases in group A, 21 cases in group B, 19 cases in group B; No drug allergy and other adverse reactions were found in all the patients. 2. Comparison of general data: there was no statistical significance in comparison between the two groups before operation (P 0.05), which was comparable; 3.The results of comparison between the two groups: the effect of detumescence was significantly different between the two groups at 4 weeks after operation (P 0.05); In terms of pain intensity and elbow joint score, there was no significant difference between the two groups in 2 weeks after operation (P 0.05), 4 weeks after operation and 6 weeks after operation, and 6 months after operation, the two groups had statistical significance compared with the two groups (P 0.01). There was significant difference between the two groups, and the excellent and good rate of elbow joint function evaluation was higher than that of the control group. The improvement of elbow motion in group A and group B was larger than that in group B, 4 weeks after operation, 6 weeks after operation and 6 months after operation, there was significant difference between the two groups (P 0.01). There are very significant differences; For the improvement of ulnar nerve symptoms, there was no significant difference between the two groups at each time point after operation (P 0.05). 6 months after operation, the excellent and good rate of the curative effect of the two groups was determined by the bone injury lotion group (85.72B group) and the treatment control group (15.79g%). There was a very significant difference between the two groups (P 0.01). Conclusion: the bone injury lotion group is more effective than the simple functional exercise group in promoting elbow joint swelling and pain relief after elbow stiffness relaxation. [WT5HZ] [WT5 "HZ] [WT5BZ] [WT5" BZ] [WT5 "BZ] [WT5" BZ]. Increased activity and functional rehabilitation are effective.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：R687.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 寧凡友;王俊頎;趙明;許海燕;;熏洗結(jié)合手法治療外傷性肘關(guān)節(jié)僵硬124例[J];光明中醫(yī);2011年05期

2 梁鹿章，孔祿生，，郭躍興，陳忠林;肱骨髁上骨折肘部腫脹分度及對(duì)前臂血流的影響[J];湖南醫(yī)學(xué);1996年01期

3 金岷;中藥熏洗法治療骨傷疾病136例[J];湖南中醫(yī)雜志;2001年05期

4 王曉艷;劉紅晶;;威利坦治療兒童肘部骨折術(shù)后腫脹的臨床觀察[J];實(shí)用藥物與臨床;2008年03期

5 楊麗娜;鞠儉奎;;細(xì)辛用量研究探討[J];遼寧中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

6 趙梁,葛鴻慶;鄧晉豐教授對(duì)骨折術(shù)后的中醫(yī)辨治經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];四川中醫(yī);2002年02期

7 黃雷,張波,王滿宜,蔣協(xié)遠(yuǎn),吳新寶,張貴林,危杰,榮國(guó)威;肱骨髁間骨折的手術(shù)治療[J];中華骨科雜志;2001年03期

8 潘達(dá)德,顧玉東,侍德,壽奎水;中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)手外科學(xué)會(huì)上肢部分功能評(píng)定試用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];中華手外科雜志;2000年03期

9 俞力行 ,張友定;熏洗方治療外傷后期關(guān)節(jié)僵硬76例療效觀察[J];中醫(yī)正骨;2004年11期

10 孫成長(zhǎng);;手法松解合中藥熏洗治療損傷后肘關(guān)節(jié)僵硬[J];中醫(yī)正骨;2008年07期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 高玉龍;關(guān)節(jié)鏡配合中藥熏洗治療肘關(guān)節(jié)骨化性肌炎的臨床觀察[D];湖北中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：1483032