本文關(guān)鍵詞： ATP生物熒光法 肉眼裸視法 清洗效果 影響因素　出處：《中國消毒學(xué)雜志》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：目的觀察ATP生物熒光法評(píng)價(jià)醫(yī)療器械清洗效果及影響因素。方法采用ATP生物熒光法,評(píng)價(jià)醫(yī)療器械清洗效果,同時(shí)與目測(cè)法作比較。結(jié)果按照本研究清洗程序清洗后的240件醫(yī)療器械肉眼裸視法檢測(cè)合格率98.8%,放大鏡觀察法檢測(cè)合格率82.1%;ATP生物熒光法檢測(cè)結(jié)果顯示,不同清洗方法、不同存放時(shí)間的醫(yī)療器械清洗后所測(cè)定的RLU對(duì)數(shù)值之間有顯著統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P≤0.001)。多元線性回歸分析發(fā)現(xiàn),ATP熒光法檢測(cè)值(RLU)的對(duì)數(shù)值與清洗方法、存放時(shí)間呈正線性相關(guān)(P0.001),回歸模型顯著(F=22.38,P0.001),但校正R2為0.20,擬合優(yōu)度一般。結(jié)論該醫(yī)院醫(yī)療器械肉眼裸視法及放大鏡觀察法合格率較高,清洗方法、存放時(shí)間可影響醫(yī)療器械清洗效果,ATP熒光檢測(cè)法檢測(cè)結(jié)果與肉眼觀察法差異較大。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the cleaning effect and influencing factors of medical device by ATP biofluorescence method. Methods ATP biofluorescence method was used to evaluate the cleaning effect of medical device. Results according to the cleaning procedure of this study, 240 medical instruments were cleaned by naked eye method, the qualified rate was 98.8, and the qualified rate of magnifying glass observation method was 82.1%. The results of ATP biofluorescence method showed that different cleaning methods were different. Significant statistical significance was found between the logarithmic values of RLU measured after cleaning of medical devices at different storage times (P 鈮，

本文編號(hào)：1509448