本文選題：痤瘡 + 紅藍光　； 參考：《重慶醫(yī)科大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 目的:比較紅光(630nm)和藍光(415nm)聯(lián)合治療面部痤瘡與單純藍光(415nm)治療面部痤瘡的臨床療效。 方法:將61例面部痤瘡患者隨機分為紅藍光聯(lián)合治療組與單純藍光治療組,分別進行8周治療,于實驗第2.4.6.8周對療效進行比較分析。 結果:59例患者完成了實驗,紅藍光聯(lián)合治療組對膿皰、結節(jié)/囊腫的療效(皮損總數(shù)的減少率)較單純藍光治療組好,而單純藍光治療組對丘疹的療效較好,所得結果均有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。8周治療結束后,兩組皮損總有效率無差異性(P0.05)。 結論:紅藍光聯(lián)合治療及單純藍光治療均對面部痤瘡有一定的療效,雖然二者總體療效無差別,但對不同類型皮疹的療效不同,且所得結果有統(tǒng)計學意義。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the clinical efficacy of red light (630nm) and blue light (415nm) in the treatment of facial acne. Methods: Sixty-one patients with facial acne were randomly divided into red and blue light combined treatment group and pure blue light treatment group for 8 weeks respectively. The therapeutic effects were compared and analyzed at 2.4.6.8 weeks in the experiment. Results the results showed that the curative effect of the combined red and blue light group on pustules, nodules / cysts (the reduction rate of the total number of lesions) was better than that of the pure blue light treatment group, but the blue light group was better than the blue light group in the treatment of papules. The results were statistically significant (P0.05) after the end of the treatment, the two groups had no difference in the total effective rate of skin lesions (P0.05). Conclusion: the combination of red and blue light therapy and pure blue light therapy have certain curative effect on facial acne. Although there is no difference in the overall curative effect between them, the curative effect is different for different types of rash, and the results are statistically significant.
【學位授予單位】：重慶醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：R758.733

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 劉清;;中藥聯(lián)合紅藍光照射治療痤瘡49例療效觀察[J];北京中醫(yī);2006年10期

2 吳志剛;聯(lián)合藥物治療痤瘡療效觀察[J];重慶醫(yī)學;2004年06期

3 鐘建橋;先德海;陳德宇;;窄譜藍光治療尋常痤瘡臨床療效觀察[J];臨床皮膚科雜志;2007年02期

4 丁蕙琳;項蕾紅;鄭志忠;;窄譜藍光療法治療尋常痤瘡[J];中華皮膚科雜志;2006年02期

，

本文編號：2093774