MSM人群HIV感染者梅毒RPR試驗假陽性分析
發(fā)布時間:2018-03-18 03:22
本文選題:人類免疫缺陷病毒 切入點:梅毒 出處:《中國皮膚性病學雜志》2017年05期 論文類型:期刊論文
【摘要】:目的了解男男同性戀者(MSM)中人類免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者梅毒快速血漿反應素環(huán)狀卡片試驗(RPR)生物學假陽性反應(BFP)情況。方法對我院MSM人群篩查隊列進行RPR試驗、梅毒螺旋體明膠凝集試驗(TPPA)試驗和HIV抗體初篩,比較梅毒RPR生物學假陽性(RPR-BFP)發(fā)生情況。結(jié)果共10 000例MSM,HIV抗體陽性者中,RPR-BFP 0.15%(3/1 989);HIV抗體陰性者中,RPR-BFP0.27%(22/8 011)。該兩組人群RPR試驗假陽性率差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。結(jié)論 HIV感染沒有增加梅毒RPR生物學假陽性反應。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the rapid plasma reactive hormone (RPR) positive biological-false positive reaction of syphilis infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in male homosexuals (MSM). Methods the RPR test was performed on the screening cohort of MSM population in our hospital. Treponema pallidum gelatin agglutination test and HIV antibody screening, Results the incidence of RPR-BFP 0.15% RPR-BFP in 10 000 patients with positive RPR antibody was compared. Conclusion there is no significant difference in false positive rate of RPR test between the two groups. Conclusion there is no significant difference in false positive rate of RPR test between the two groups. Conclusion there is no significant difference in the false positive rate of RPR-BFP 0.27 and 22 / 8 0111.Conclusion there is no significant difference in the false positive rate of RPR test between the two groups. Conclusion there is no significant difference in the false positive rate of RPR test between the two groups. To increase the biological false positive reaction of syphilis RPR.
【作者單位】: 首都醫(yī)科大學附屬北京佑安醫(yī)院;
【分類號】:R512.91;R759.1
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 王紅梅;應用雞蛋清替代梅素陽性血清進行RPR試驗的研究[J];中等醫(yī)學教育;2001年02期
2 周平玉,熊思東,閻春林,徐金華,廖康煌;梅毒患者皮損中Th1/Th2細胞因子表達與RPR試驗陰轉(zhuǎn)的關(guān)系[J];中華皮膚科雜志;2004年12期
3 ;[J];;年期
,本文編號:1627786
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/pifb/1627786.html
最近更新
教材專著