尿脫落細(xì)胞FISH檢測(cè)方法與CT掃描及尿細(xì)胞學(xué)檢測(cè)在上尿路尿路上皮腫瘤診斷中的應(yīng)用及對(duì)比
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the clinical efficacy of fluorescence in situ hybridization (fish), computed tomography (CT) and exfoliative cytology in the diagnosis of upper urinary epithelial cell carcinoma with hematuria as the main symptom. Methods from August 2010 to August 2011, 30 patients with suspected upper urinary tract epithelial cell carcinoma (UECC) were examined by fish, CT and exfoliative cytology. A total of 21 cases were pathologically diagnosed as upper urinary epithelial cell carcinoma (UECC). There were 14 cases of renal pelvis carcinoma and 7 cases of ureteral carcinoma. The other 9 cases were renal pelvis neuroendocrine carcinoma (1 case), renal tuberculosis (2 cases) and clear cell carcinoma (6 cases). Results the total sensitivity of fish CT and urine cytology to upper urinary epithelial cell carcinoma was 85.7and 66.7and 28.60.FISH was significantly higher than that of CT (P0. 014) and urine exfoliative cytology (P0. 05). Fish was significantly higher than urinary exfoliative cytology (P0.013). Fish for TaT1T2T3 / T4 was significantly higher than that of CT (P0. 014) and urine cytology (P0. 013). The results of CT examination were 33. 3% and 75. 0%, respectively. The results of urine exfoliation cytology were 0. 025. 0 and 100. The specificity of CT and urine exfoliative cytology in the diagnosis of upper urinary epithelial cell carcinoma was 88.9 / 77.8T and 100, respectively.The specificity of CT and urine exfoliative cytology in the diagnosis of upper urinary epithelial cell carcinoma (UECC) was 88. 9% and 77. 8%, respectively. There was no statistical difference among the three groups (P0.05). Conclusion the sensitivity of fish in the detection of upper urinary tract epithelial cell carcinoma is significantly higher than that of CT, and the sensitivity of CT is significantly higher than that of urine exfoliative cytology. Fish technique can improve the diagnosis of upper urinary tract epithelial cell carcinoma.
【作者單位】: 河北省人民醫(yī)院泌尿外科;河北省人民醫(yī)院血液內(nèi)科;
【分類號(hào)】:R737.1
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 林毅;陳文軒;郭洪波;李黎明;;熒光原位雜交技術(shù)在上尿路腫瘤診斷中的應(yīng)用[J];山東醫(yī)藥;2010年10期
2 時(shí)姍姍;王璇;馬恒輝;周曉軍;王建東;;熒光原位雜交技術(shù)在尿脫落細(xì)胞學(xué)檢查中的應(yīng)用[J];醫(yī)學(xué)研究生學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期
3 夏蓓,李肇春,李鍵英,王慶堂,章詠裳;應(yīng)用尿脫落細(xì)胞學(xué)方法對(duì)血尿病因檢查分析[J];同濟(jì)醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1990年04期
4 李峻,何曉文,盧建,靳小青,馬小兵,孫民,王慶蓉,鈕燕;晨尿脫落細(xì)胞端粒酶活性的檢測(cè)及臨床意義[J];第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年09期
5 楊青;李俊;;膀胱癌尿脫落細(xì)胞學(xué)檢查與尿液腫瘤標(biāo)志物研究進(jìn)展[J];安徽醫(yī)藥;2012年04期
6 江曉紅;丁偉;;尖底離心管再離心技術(shù)在清亮尿脫落細(xì)胞學(xué)制片中應(yīng)用[J];臨床與實(shí)驗(yàn)病理學(xué)雜志;2009年01期
7 吉名顯;歐陽乾;呂純義;;腎海綿狀血管瘤[J];天津醫(yī)藥;1987年08期
8 楊青;李俊;梁朝朝;;核基質(zhì)蛋白22聯(lián)合尿脫落細(xì)胞學(xué)檢查對(duì)膀胱癌診斷的價(jià)值[J];安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期
9 林天海;張朋;魏強(qiáng);;晨尿標(biāo)本和新鮮尿標(biāo)本對(duì)尿脫落細(xì)胞學(xué)檢查的影響[J];成都醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期
10 黃錦華,李泗耀;膀胱鏡、B超、尿脫落細(xì)胞學(xué)檢查在膀胱癌診斷的評(píng)價(jià)[J];廣州醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條
1 王靜華;;尿脫落細(xì)胞學(xué)檢查在診斷膀胱癌中應(yīng)用的臨床意義[A];第十五屆全國泌尿外科學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2008年
2 陳方敏;石家齊;谷江;李登寶;曾甫清;;原發(fā)性膀胱癌誤診原因的分析及策略[A];貴州省醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)泌尿外科分會(huì)2006年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2006年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 北京大學(xué)第一醫(yī)院泌尿外科醫(yī)師 郝瀚;血尿 不可忽視的疾病信號(hào)[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2014年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 李晨光;熒光原位雜交在尿路上皮癌診斷中的應(yīng)用[D];天津醫(yī)科大學(xué);2009年
2 郭洪波;熒光原位雜交檢測(cè)尿路上皮癌分子細(xì)胞遺傳學(xué)變異的臨床應(yīng)用研究[D];天津醫(yī)科大學(xué);2009年
3 郭垣杉;人尿脫落細(xì)胞FISH檢查與尿脫落細(xì)胞學(xué)檢查和膀胱鏡檢查在尿路移行細(xì)胞癌診斷中的應(yīng)用及對(duì)比研究[D];河北醫(yī)科大學(xué);2012年
4 陳良佑;熒光原位雜交技術(shù)在膀胱癌診斷中的應(yīng)用[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年
,本文編號(hào):2138409
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/mjlw/2138409.html