液橋試驗(yàn)聯(lián)合腹壓漏尿點(diǎn)壓對女性壓力性尿失禁評估的價(jià)值
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-06-07 10:01
【摘要】:目的:探討液橋試驗(yàn)聯(lián)合腹壓漏尿點(diǎn)壓(LPP)診斷女性壓力性尿失禁(SUI)及判斷尿道功能的價(jià)值。方法:選取臨床診斷為SUI的女性患者50例和對照35例,進(jìn)行液橋試驗(yàn)和LPP測定,記錄膀胱與尿道壓力升高幅度的差值(ΔP)。結(jié)果:液橋試驗(yàn)陽性44例,其中LPP分型Ⅰ型11例,Ⅱ型12例,Ⅱ/Ⅲ型9例,Ⅲ型12例。液橋試驗(yàn)診斷SUI的靈敏度為0.88,特異度為0.94;液橋試驗(yàn)聯(lián)合LPP診斷SUI的靈敏度為0.94,特異度為0.97。Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型、Ⅱ/Ⅲ型、Ⅲ型組ΔP逐漸增大(P0.05)。結(jié)論:液橋試驗(yàn)聯(lián)合LPP可成為診斷SUI并判斷下尿路功能的有效手段。
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the value of liquid bridge test combined with abdominal pressure leakage point pressure (LPP) in the diagnosis of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urethral function. Methods: 50 female patients with SUI and 35 controls were selected. Liquid bridge test and LPP were performed to record the difference between bladder and urethral pressure (螖 P). Results: 44 cases were positive in liquid bridge test, including 11 cases of type 鈪,
本文編號:2494711
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the value of liquid bridge test combined with abdominal pressure leakage point pressure (LPP) in the diagnosis of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urethral function. Methods: 50 female patients with SUI and 35 controls were selected. Liquid bridge test and LPP were performed to record the difference between bladder and urethral pressure (螖 P). Results: 44 cases were positive in liquid bridge test, including 11 cases of type 鈪,
本文編號:2494711
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/fuchankeerkelunwen/2494711.html
最近更新
教材專著