腹腔鏡根治性子宮切除術(shù)與開腹手術(shù)治療宮頸癌的療效比較
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (laparoscopic radicalhysterectomy,LRH) and transabdominal radical hysterectomy (radical abdominalhysterectomy,RAH) in the treatment of cervical cancer. Safety and feasibility. Methods from January 2012 to July 2013, the medical records of 63 patients with cervical cancer who were treated with LRH in the first affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (laparoscopic group) were analyzed retrospectively. 74 cases of cervical cancer treated with RAH were selected as control group (open group). Age, stage, histological type, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, number of lymph nodes removed, length of vagina, length of main ligament, length of sacral ligament, blood transfusion were compared between the two groups. Intraoperative and postoperative complications (including intraoperative vascular injury, intestinal injury, ureteral injury, bladder injury, postoperative urinary tract infection, urinary retention, lymphocyst, incision infection, wound healing, intestinal root obstruction), surgical prognosis, etc. Results there was no significant difference in the operation time, the number of lymph nodes, the length of sacral ligament and the number of urinary tract infection between the two groups (P0.05). The volume of intraoperative bleeding in the laparoscopic group was significantly lower than that in the open group (P0.01), and the vaginal length in the laparoscopic group was (3.34 鹵0.45) cm larger than that in the laparotomy group (3.17 鹵0.36) cm,P 0.05.There was no blood transfusion in the laparoscopic group. There was significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05). There were 13 cases of intraoperative and postoperative complications in the laparoscopic group and 41 cases in the open group (P 0.05). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05). There was only one case of bladder injury in the laparoscopic group. Urinary retention, vascular injury, bladder injury, ureteral injury, intestinal injury, nerve injury, intestinal root obstruction were observed in the two groups. There was no significant difference in lower extremity deep vein thrombosis lymphocysts (P0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has the advantages of clear visual field, less trauma, high safety, less bleeding, thorough operation and quick postoperative recovery. It has important clinical application value for surgical treatment of cervical cancer.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:重慶醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:R737.33
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 李艷;陳勇;徐惠成;李玉艷;梁志清;;腹腔鏡廣泛子宮切除和盆腔淋巴結(jié)切除術(shù)治療子宮頸癌237例臨床分析[J];中國婦產(chǎn)科臨床雜志;2009年03期
2 黃子健;王一斌;許文靜;黃薇;陳微微;;腹腔鏡下廣泛全子宮切除加盆腔淋巴結(jié)清掃治療子宮惡性腫瘤11例臨床研究[J];腹腔鏡外科雜志;2010年01期
3 侯彩英;宮榮杰;姚元慶;;宮頸癌的治療進(jìn)展[J];現(xiàn)代生物醫(yī)學(xué)進(jìn)展;2011年21期
4 顏笑健;李光儀;陳露詩;尚慧玲;林鐵成;梁立治;;腹腔鏡廣泛全子宮切除加盆腔淋巴結(jié)清掃術(shù)治療子宮惡性腫瘤安全性分析[J];中國實用婦科與產(chǎn)科雜志;2007年12期
5 曹澤毅;子宮頸癌治療的變遷和思考[J];中華婦產(chǎn)科雜志;2004年03期
6 王中海;黃樹峰;樂愛文;;腹腔鏡下廣泛子宮切除、盆腔淋巴結(jié)清掃術(shù)治療子宮惡性腫瘤[J];中國微創(chuàng)外科雜志;2009年06期
7 肇麗杰;柳曉春;謝慶煌;鄭玉華;陳向東;;陰式廣泛全子宮切除加腹腔鏡下淋巴結(jié)切除術(shù)與開腹手術(shù)治療早期宮頸癌療效比較[J];中國實用婦科與產(chǎn)科雜志;2012年06期
8 姜艷;孔為民;;宮頸癌發(fā)病年輕化趨勢的研究現(xiàn)狀[J];醫(yī)學(xué)綜述;2012年24期
9 高媛;陳龍;張萍;盛明珠;;腹腔鏡輔助陰式與開腹廣泛子宮切除術(shù)治療早期宮頸癌的比較[J];中國微創(chuàng)外科雜志;2013年08期
本文編號:2362309
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/fuchankeerkelunwen/2362309.html