本文選題：胎盤植入　切入點：外體RNA　出處：《河北大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：目的:通過研究經術中及術后病理確診的胎盤植入患者血清外體RNA(exosomal RNA)及甲胎蛋白(AFP)的濃度,來探討二者對胎盤植入的診斷價值。方法:選取2014年1月至2016年12月于我院產科行剖宮產分娩的兇險性前置胎盤的單胎孕婦76例(兇險性前置胎盤是指既往有剖宮產史,此次妊娠為前置胎盤,且胎盤附著于子宮下段原剖宮產切口瘢痕處,發(fā)生胎盤植入機率約為50%)。根據(jù)剖宮產手術及術后病檢結果分為胎盤植入組(32例)與非胎盤植入組(44例),另外選取同期行剖宮產分娩的既往有剖宮產手術史,此次妊娠胎盤位置正常,無其他妊娠合并癥及并發(fā)癥的單胎孕婦50例作為對照組。分別在產前抽取3組孕婦的外周肘靜脈血,提取血清中的exosomal RNA并測定其濃度,檢測AFP水平,對比分析三組之間的差異,利用受試者工作特征曲線(ROC曲線)找出其臨床診斷的最佳臨界值(cut off值),比較exosomal RNA、AFP及兩者聯(lián)合時對胎盤植入的產前診斷價值。結果:1.三組患者的一般情況比較無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);胎盤植入組患者血清exosomal RNA濃度與非胎盤植入組及對照組相比均有顯著差異(P0.05),而AFP在胎盤植入組患者中的濃度較非胎盤植入組及對照組也明顯增高,均有顯著的統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05見表2)。2.血清exosomal RNA及AFP在胎盤植入中的臨床診斷最佳臨界值(cut off值)分別為40.28ng/ml和256.56U/L。3.Exosomal RNA以40.28ng/ml作為臨床診斷閾值時,其診斷胎盤植入的靈敏度、特異度及準確度分別為90.6%、75.5%、81.6%;AFP以256.56U/L作為臨床診斷閾值時的靈敏度、特異度及準確度分別為78.1%、85.1%、81.6%;而兩者聯(lián)合時平行診斷試驗的靈敏度、準確度分別為93.8%、76.3%;系列診斷試驗的特異度、準確度分別為95.5%、86.8%。結論:在胎盤植入的產前診斷中,exosomal RNA及AFP均有一定的價值,兩者單獨應用時exosomal RNA的診斷價值略高于AFP,而二者平行及系列聯(lián)合時可顯著提高產前診斷的靈敏度及特異度,優(yōu)于血清exosomal RNA及AFP單項檢測。
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the concentrations of RNA(exosomal and AFP in the serum of placental accreta patients confirmed by intraoperative and postoperative pathology. Methods: from January 2014 to December 2016, 76 pregnant women with dangerous placenta previa who were delivered by cesarean section in our hospital were selected. The pregnancy was placenta previa, and the placenta attached to the scar of the former cesarean incision in the lower part of the uterus. According to the results of cesarean section and postoperative disease examination, the placenta accreta group (32 cases) and the non-placental accreta group (44 cases) were divided into two groups. 50 cases of single pregnancy with normal placenta position and no complications and complications were used as control group. The peripheral venous blood was extracted from three groups of pregnant women before antepartum, the serum exosomal RNA was extracted and its concentration was measured, and the level of AFP was measured. Comparing and analyzing the differences between the three groups, Using the operating characteristic curve of subjects to find out the best critical value of off for clinical diagnosis, to compare the value of exosomal off and its combination in the prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta. Results: 1. The general condition of the three groups was no more than that of the control group. The concentration of serum exosomal RNA in placenta accreta group was significantly higher than that in non-placental accreta group and control group, and the concentration of AFP in placenta accreta group was significantly higher than that in non-placental accreta group and control group. There was significant statistical significance (P0.05) in Table 2. 2.The best critical value of serum exosomal RNA and AFP in clinical diagnosis of placenta accreta was 40.28ng/ml and 256.56U/L.3.Exosomal RNA. The sensitivity of 40.28ng/ml and 256.56U/L.3.Exosomal RNA in the diagnosis of placenta accreta was obtained when 40.28ng/ml was used as the diagnostic threshold of placenta accreta. The specificity and accuracy were 90.6 and 75.5 respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 256.56U/L as the diagnostic threshold were 78.1 and 81.6, respectively; and the sensitivity and accuracy of parallel diagnostic tests were 93.85.30.The specificity and accuracy of the series of diagnostic tests were respectively 93.85.30.The specificity and accuracy of the series of diagnostic tests were respectively 78.1% and 85.6%, respectively. Conclusion: RNA and AFP are valuable in prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta. The diagnostic value of exosomal RNA was slightly higher than that of AFP alone, and the sensitivity and specificity of prenatal diagnosis could be significantly improved by parallel and serial combination of them, which was superior to serum exosomal RNA and single detection of AFP.
【學位授予單位】：河北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R714.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 金日男;許紅雁;鐘永紅;曠雙紅;;血清甲胎蛋白聯(lián)合彩色超聲檢查在胎盤植入產前診斷中的價值[J];現(xiàn)代婦產科進展;2016年08期

2 顏建英;吳新枝;張勤建;;血管內皮生長因子和胎盤微血管密度與胎盤植入發(fā)病的關系[J];中華圍產醫(yī)學雜志;2016年08期

3 王茹;張亞鳳;;子宮動脈化療栓塞治療胎盤植入致產后大出血的臨床觀察[J];中外女性健康研究;2016年11期

4 張方圓;孔祥;王志學;;胎盤植入的產前診斷[J];現(xiàn)代婦產科進展;2015年09期

5 李悅;;髂內動脈預置球囊在兇險型前置胎盤伴胎盤植入患者中的應用[J];臨床醫(yī)學工程;2015年08期

6 李卓;康煒;李蕊;郝曉柯;馬越云;;人血清Exosome的分離及其miRNA檢測的臨床價值[J];中華檢驗醫(yī)學雜志;2015年08期

7 雷曉真;黃淑暉;鄭九生;劉淮;;超聲聯(lián)合甲胎蛋白檢測預測兇險型前置胎盤合并胎盤植入的臨床價值[J];中國婦幼保健;2015年18期

8 李玉靜;刁振宇;薛平平;沈莉;龔萍;顏桂軍;胡婭莉;;血清中胎盤來源外泌體的分離與鑒定[J];醫(yī)學研究生學報;2015年06期

9 文建榮;王敏;;磁共振成像對胎盤植入深度的診斷研究[J];影像技術;2014年05期

10 陳丹;馬小燕;;三維能量多普勒超聲產前診斷胎盤植入的研究進展[J];中國醫(yī)學影像學雜志;2014年09期

，

本文編號：1652582