【摘要】：目的探討腦電生物反饋訓(xùn)練對青少年網(wǎng)絡(luò)成癮的干預(yù)效果,為開展青少年網(wǎng)絡(luò)成癮的干預(yù)提供參考。方法將從贛州市大中學(xué)生中篩選的50例網(wǎng)絡(luò)成癮青少年隨機分為2組,對研究組(25例)開展腦電生物反饋訓(xùn)練,對照組(25例)進行心理行為干預(yù)。采用Young網(wǎng)絡(luò)成癮診斷量表(Internet Addiction Test,IAT)和焦慮自評量表(Self-Rating Anxiety Scale,SAS),于干預(yù)前及干預(yù)12周末各評定1次。結(jié)果干預(yù)12周后,研究組IAT評分由72.78下降至58.67(t=4.267,P0.01),SAS評分由36.84下降至30.35(t=3.689,P=0.001);對照組IAT評分由72.47下降至65.05(t=2.181,P=0.039),SAS評分由37.07下降至33.23(t=2.216,P=0.036)。干預(yù)后研究組IAT及SAS評分均低于對照組(t值分別為2.092,2.101,P值均0.05)。研究組干預(yù)有效率(32%)高于對照組(8%)(χ~2=4.500,P=0.034)。結(jié)論腦電生物反饋訓(xùn)練療效較傳統(tǒng)心理行為干預(yù)更為顯著,但是12周的訓(xùn)練尚不能完全矯正網(wǎng)絡(luò)成癮行為。
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the effect of EEG biofeedback training on adolescent internet addiction and to provide reference for the intervention of adolescent internet addiction. Methods Fifty adolescents with internet addiction were randomly divided into two groups: the study group (25 cases) received EEG biofeedback training and the control group (25 cases) underwent psychological and behavioral intervention. Young Internet Addiction Diagnostic scale (Internet Addiction Test,IAT) and self rating anxiety scale (Self-Rating Anxiety Scale,SAS) were used once before and after 12 weeks of intervention. Results after 12 weeks of intervention, the IAT score of the study group was reduced from 72.78 to 58.67 (t = 4.267, P 0.01, from 36.84 to 30.35, respectively). The IAT score of the control group decreased from 72.47 to 65.05 (t = 2.181). The), SAS score of the control group was decreased from 37.07 to 33.23 (t = 2.216p = 0.036). After intervention, the scores of IAT and SAS in the study group were lower than those in the control group (t = 2. 092 鹵2. 101, P < 0. 05). The effective rate of intervention in the study group (32%) was higher than that in the control group (8%) (蠂 ~ 2 = 4.500). Conclusion EEG biofeedback training is more effective than traditional psychological and behavioral intervention, but 12 weeks training can not completely correct Internet addiction behavior.
【作者單位】： 贛南醫(yī)學(xué)院藥學(xué)院;贛南醫(yī)學(xué)院預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)系;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金項目(81460499) 江西省自然科學(xué)基金項目(20122BAB215025)
【分類號】：R749.99

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張智;宋家芹;朱金芳;; 生物反饋技術(shù)治療心理疾病初探[J];蚌埠醫(yī)藥;1992年02期

2 張姝;;藥物治療結(jié)合生物反饋促進多動癥患兒的康復(fù)[J];中國健康心理學(xué)雜志;2009年06期

3 趙榮香;何曉蕓;張楊繼林;;腦電生物反饋對兒童注意缺陷多動障礙的療效觀察[J];四川醫(yī)學(xué);2009年12期

4 袁靜,郭華,王玉水;腦功能生物反饋聯(lián)合益智湯治療兒童注意力缺陷多動癥[J];天津醫(yī)藥;2005年04期

5 伏潔;劉光陵;夏正坤;高春林;付元鳳;高遠賦;樊忠民;張連豐;任獻國;黃慧敏;;腦電生物反饋對診斷和治療兒童注意缺陷多動障礙的臨床探討[J];醫(yī)學(xué)研究生學(xué)報;2006年03期

6 吳玉帆;束曉梅;;生物反饋對兒童抽動障礙療效研究[J];遵義醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年02期

7 張風(fēng)華;注意缺陷多動障礙患兒腦電生物反饋治療進展[J];中國實用兒科雜志;2002年12期

8 高春林;何旭;夏正坤;任獻國;吳春蕾;劉光陵;;腦電生物反饋對自發(fā)性高血壓大鼠行為學(xué)及紋狀體即早期基因fosB表達的影響[J];臨床兒科雜志;2011年03期

9 張弛;琚偉;馬炳祥;班會會;;腦電生物反饋聯(lián)合健脾平肝顆粒治療脾虛肝亢型兒童注意力缺陷多動癥28例[J];中醫(yī)研究;2013年05期

10 趙秋生,李迎新,劉U，

本文編號：2346390