【摘要】：本文結(jié)合地理信息系統(tǒng)工作原理與方法,以及攝影技術(shù)相輔,研究種群空間分布格局。利用Ripley's K函數(shù),在10mxlom的空間尺度上定量分析了4種不同草地利用方式：2012-2015年圍欄放牧刈割實(shí)驗(yàn)的CK(圍封)、放牧、放牧割草、割草樣地,刈割留茬高度為6cm的優(yōu)勢(shì)種克氏針茅、羊草、糙隱子草種群的空間格局變化及其隨尺度的變化規(guī)律；用蒙特卡羅(Monte-Carlo)隨機(jī)模擬方法估計(jì)了h(t)的置信限。研究了不同草地利用方式對(duì)典型草原3種優(yōu)勢(shì)種種群空間分布格局的影響以及由此引發(fā)的各種群密度的變化,并以放牧和刈割條件下克氏針茅、羊草、糙隱子草種群自身的生物學(xué)特性以及生態(tài)適應(yīng)對(duì)策為基礎(chǔ),進(jìn)一步探討產(chǎn)生和維持這些格局的機(jī)理,為草原的合理利用提供科學(xué)依據(jù)。研究結(jié)果表明：1.割草樣地中克氏針茅種群在0.50-3.70 m尺度間的聚集程度顯著高于圍封以及放牧樣地,放牧割草樣地中克氏針茅種群在0.60-3.50 m尺度間的聚集程度顯著高于放牧、CK樣地。放牧樣地中克氏針茅種群在0.70-1.60 m尺度間聚集程度顯著高于對(duì)照。割草對(duì)克氏針茅種群的空間分布格局的影響要更加強(qiáng)于放牧。2.放牧割草樣地中羊草種群在0.80-3.10 m尺度間的聚集程度顯著高于放牧、割草以及圍封樣地,放牧樣地中羊草種群在1.00-3.10 m尺度間聚集程度顯著高于CK以及割草樣地。割草樣地中羊草種群在0-3.10 m尺度間的聚集程度顯著高于對(duì)照。這與其生活史特征和種群對(duì)放牧以及刈割壓力的生態(tài)適應(yīng)對(duì)策密切相關(guān),放牧對(duì)羊草種群的空間分布格局的影響要強(qiáng)于割草。3.放牧樣地中,糙隱子草種群在0-2.90 m尺度間的聚集程度顯著高于放牧割草、割草、CK樣地。放牧割草樣地中,糙隱子草種群在0-1.80 m尺度間聚集程度顯著高于割草、CK樣地。割草樣地中,糙隱子草種群在0.40-1.15m尺度間聚集程度顯著高于對(duì)照。這主要是由于放牧與刈割的選擇性不同,放牧對(duì)糙隱子草種群的空間分布格局的影響要更加強(qiáng)于割草。4.放牧和割草脅迫下引起種群空間分布格局的變化,其實(shí)質(zhì)是各種群為了抵御脅迫,各自在其母體周?chē)敝炒罅啃碌闹仓陚�(gè)體,提高小尺度范圍內(nèi)的種群聚集程度,改變自身形態(tài)和空間分布狀態(tài),來(lái)抵御踐踏、采食與刈割。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the spatial distribution pattern of population is studied by combining the principle and method of GIS and photography. Based on the Ripley's K function, this paper quantitatively analyzed the CK (enclosure), grazing grass mowing, mowing sample land and cutting stubble height of Stipa krjabini, which were the dominant species of four different grassland utilization modes: 2012 to 2015, which were fenced grazing experiment in 2012-2015. The cutting stubble height was the dominant species of Stipa Kirschsonii. The spatial pattern of Leymus chinensis population and its variation with scale are studied. The confidence limits of h (t) are estimated by using Monte-Carlo stochastic simulation method. The effects of different grassland utilization patterns on spatial distribution patterns of three dominant groups in typical grassland and the changes of population densities caused by them were studied, and Stipa krjabini and Leymus chinensis were studied under grazing and cutting conditions. On the basis of the biological characteristics and ecological adaptation strategies of the population of Steenopsis scabra, the mechanism of producing and maintaining these patterns was further discussed, which provided scientific basis for the rational utilization of steppe. The results of the study show that 1: 1. The aggregation degree of Stipa krjabini population in the scale of 0.50-3.70 m was significantly higher than that in the enclosed land and grazing land, and the aggregation degree of Stipa krjabini population in the grazing sample land was significantly higher than that in the grazing plot with the scale of 0.60-3.50 m. The agglomeration degree of Stipa Kirschsoni population in the scale of 0.70-1.60 m was significantly higher than that of the control. The effect of mowing on the spatial distribution pattern of Stipa krjabini population was stronger than that of grazing. 2. The agglomeration degree of Leymus chinensis population in the scale of 0.80-3.10 m was significantly higher than that of grazing, mowing and enclosed plots, and the aggregation degree of Leymus chinensis population in the scale of 1.00-3.10 m was significantly higher than that of CK and mower land. The aggregation degree of Leymus chinensis population in the scale of 0-3.10 m was significantly higher than that of the control. This is closely related to the characteristics of its life history and the ecological adaptation of the population to grazing and cutting pressure, and the effect of grazing on the spatial distribution pattern of Leymus chinensis population is stronger than that of mowing. 3. In grazing plots, the aggregation degree of herbaceous populations in 0-2.90 m scale was significantly higher than that in grazing grass mowing CK plots. In grazing mowing plots, the aggregation degree of population in 0-1.80 m scale was significantly higher than that in CK plots. In mowing plots, the aggregation degree of population in the scale of 0.40-1.15m was significantly higher than that of the control. This was mainly due to the difference of grazing and mowing selectivity, and the effect of grazing on spatial distribution pattern of herbage population was stronger than that of mowing. 4. Grazing and mowing stress caused the change of population spatial distribution pattern. In essence, in order to resist stress, a variety of groups propagate a large number of new plant individuals around their mother body to improve the population aggregation in small scale. Change their own form and spatial distribution to resist trampling, forage and cutting.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：S812

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周顯明;張金國(guó);;烏桕金帶蛾幼蟲(chóng)種群空間格局及抽樣技術(shù)研究[J];貴州林業(yè)科技;1990年02期

2 繆勇;種群空間格局研究方法的幾點(diǎn)探討[J];安徽農(nóng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1991年02期

3 戚繼忠，赫永福，李克元，，張生;榛子種群空間格局及其動(dòng)態(tài)的研究[J];吉林林學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1996年02期

4 李生才;郭平毅;;微機(jī)在昆蟲(chóng)種群空間格局研究上的應(yīng)用[J];山西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1987年02期

5 何永福,李德友,李宏度,梁來(lái)榮;間澤鈍綏螨種群空間格局的研究[J];貴州農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);1993年04期

6 張連翔,溫豁然,呂尚彬,劉淑娟,秦輝,劉朝暉;昆蟲(chóng)種群空間格局研究中的幾個(gè)檢驗(yàn)問(wèn)題[J];西北林學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1996年03期

7 吳開(kāi)華;唐雪海;吳文友;黃慶豐;肖文杰;鞏永芳;;天然闊葉林優(yōu)勢(shì)種群空間格局及其關(guān)聯(lián)性分析[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期

8 劉金福,洪偉,陳清林;格氏栲種群生態(tài)學(xué)研究 V.格氏栲種群空間格局及其動(dòng)態(tài)的研究[J];福建林學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年02期

9 張連翔,于曉東,劉朝暉,柴偉;種群空間格局研究的零頻率方法及其抽樣技術(shù)[J];遼寧林業(yè)科技;1997年02期

10 高書(shū)亭,田迅;生物種群空間格局隨機(jī)性的一個(gè)檢驗(yàn)方法[J];哲里木畜牧學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1997年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 沈佐銳;;負(fù)二項(xiàng)分布與昆蟲(chóng)種群空間格局[A];北京昆蟲(chóng)學(xué)會(huì)成立四十周年學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)論文摘要匯編[C];1990年

2 馬占山;;用Weibull分布模型研究昆蟲(chóng)種群空間格局探討[A];北京昆蟲(chóng)學(xué)會(huì)成立四十周年學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)論文摘要匯編[C];1990年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 喬麗紅;放牧與刈割對(duì)典型草原優(yōu)勢(shì)種種群空間格局的影響[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2016年

2 益日貴;土默川平原南部地區(qū)鹽生植物種群空間格局特征研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：2165265