【摘要】： 目的:不同人種的身體形態(tài)和身體機(jī)能指標(biāo)是不一樣的。印度人屬白色人種,中國(guó)人屬黃色人種。國(guó)內(nèi)已經(jīng)有許多學(xué)者對(duì)我國(guó)青年的身體形態(tài)和身體機(jī)能指標(biāo)作過檢測(cè)和統(tǒng)計(jì)。本人進(jìn)行的此項(xiàng)研究主要是對(duì)我校印度男留學(xué)生做各項(xiàng)身體檢測(cè),通過統(tǒng)計(jì)描述和統(tǒng)計(jì)推斷方法得出結(jié)論,來比較印度男青年和我國(guó)男青年在身體形態(tài)和身體機(jī)能上有什么相同和異同。 實(shí)驗(yàn)方法:由同一組專業(yè)人員對(duì)受試個(gè)體進(jìn)行人體形態(tài)和機(jī)能類的一些指標(biāo)的測(cè)量,包括身高、體重、身體相關(guān)體段的圍度,相關(guān)部位的皮下脂肪厚度,臺(tái)階試驗(yàn),跑步機(jī)實(shí)驗(yàn),然后通過計(jì)算機(jī)進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)原理進(jìn)行計(jì)算和處理。 實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果:得出各個(gè)測(cè)量指標(biāo)的平均值以及95%的參考值范圍,同時(shí)通過公式得到體重指數(shù)(BMI)的平均值為22.3 kg/m2±3.1,95%的參考值范圍是17.0 kg/m2—27.6 kg/m2 ;腰髖比(WHR)的平均值為0.81±0.06,95%的參考值范圍是0.72—0.91;脂肪比例(BF%)的平均值為25.00%±2.80 ,95%的參考值范圍是20.30%—29.80%;最大氧耗量(VO2max)的平均值為2.27±0.33(L/min),95%的參考值范圍是1.71L/min—2.82 L/min。 結(jié)論:1.通過體質(zhì)研究與健康研究緊密結(jié)合,本研究得出的體質(zhì)健康標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與WHO提出的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不同。 2.目前的印度男留學(xué)生體質(zhì)健康狀況不容樂觀,我們應(yīng)該加強(qiáng)與國(guó)際之間的聯(lián)系,通過大量研究得出不同人種不同年齡不同性別人群的體質(zhì)健康標(biāo)準(zhǔn),通過這個(gè)新標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行身體鍛煉和健康,同時(shí)也能改善各國(guó)國(guó)民健康。
[Abstract]:Objective: the body shape and function index of different people are different. Indians are white and Chinese are yellow. There are many scholars in our country have made the examination and statistics on the body shape and body function index of our youth. The main purpose of this study is to do various physical tests on Indian male students in our school, and draw a conclusion by statistical description and statistical inference. To compare Indian male youth and Chinese male youth in body shape and function of what is the same and similarities and differences. Methods: the body shape and function of the subjects were measured by the same group of professionals, including height, weight, circumference of body related body segment, subcutaneous fat thickness, step test. Treadmill experiment, and then through the computer statistical principles for calculation and processing. The experimental results showed that the average value and 95% reference range of each index were obtained, and the average value of (BMI) was 22.3 kg/m2 鹵3.1 鹵95% by formula. The range of reference value was 17.0 kg/m2-27.6 kg/m2. The average reference range of (WHR) was 0.81 鹵0.06 鹵0.95%, the average of fat ratio (BF%) was 25.00% 鹵2.80, the reference range of 95% was 20.30-29.80, the average value of maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) was 2.27 鹵0.33 (L/min), and the reference range of 95% was 1.71L/min-2.82 L / min. Conclusion: 1. Through the close combination of physique research and health research, the standard of constitution health obtained in this study is different from that put forward by WHO. 2. 2. At present, the physical health status of Indian male students is not optimistic. We should strengthen our ties with the international community. Through a large number of studies, we can find out the standard of physical health of different people of different ages and different genders. This new standard for physical exercise and health can also improve national health.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：R322

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 孫耀鵬;國(guó)內(nèi)外體育鍛煉、測(cè)驗(yàn)制度中項(xiàng)目設(shè)置的比較[J];北京體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1992年03期

2 張健忠,謝佩娜;美國(guó)高�！绑w適能與健康的原理與應(yīng)用”探討與我國(guó)高校體育課程改革[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

3 趙淑英,葉金;與健康相關(guān)的體適能[J];湖北體育科技;1999年02期

4 李國(guó),高曉發(fā);中、日、美三國(guó)現(xiàn)行青少年體育測(cè)驗(yàn)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中項(xiàng)目設(shè)置比較[J];解放軍體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期

5 畢春佑,周莉,楊樹昆,趙東生,高玲娣;健康體適能教學(xué)的實(shí)驗(yàn)觀察[J];體育學(xué)刊;2003年01期

6 張建華,殷恒嬋,錢銘佳,楊鐵黎;美國(guó)最佳體適能教育計(jì)劃及其對(duì)我國(guó)體育課程改革的啟示[J];體育與科學(xué);2001年01期

7 薛長(zhǎng)勇,鄭子新,張榮欣,張效良,李溪雅,井上修二;下丘腦腹內(nèi)側(cè)核損傷性肥胖大鼠氨基酸代謝的變化[J];營(yíng)養(yǎng)學(xué)報(bào);2000年02期

8 張榮欣,薛長(zhǎng)勇,鄭子新,歐陽(yáng)紅,王偉琴,陸信超;成人BMI與體脂含量和脂肪分布的關(guān)系[J];營(yíng)養(yǎng)學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2282306