【摘要】：一般來講,世界上各個(gè)國家對(duì)災(zāi)難的報(bào)道模式均有所不同。災(zāi)難性報(bào)道作為新聞的重要組成部分,與新聞報(bào)道一樣直接在一定程度上反應(yīng)了各國的政治態(tài)度、國際關(guān)系和外交走向的發(fā)展。災(zāi)難性報(bào)道的不同模式也是反應(yīng)各國之間國際關(guān)系最好的晴雨表。所謂災(zāi)難性的新聞報(bào)道,是指新聞媒體對(duì)于各種災(zāi)難進(jìn)行的報(bào)道。然而這些報(bào)道還分為"天災(zāi)"和"人禍"。自然性的災(zāi)難報(bào)道,因其發(fā)生毫無預(yù)兆性并常常伴隨著一些比較嚴(yán)重的財(cái)產(chǎn)和人員損失并直接或間接造成比較嚴(yán)重的后果,所以常常是各家媒體和公眾十分關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn),也因此只要發(fā)生自然災(zāi)難性事件,各家媒體都會(huì)對(duì)其進(jìn)行高頻率的關(guān)注。本文在分析前人研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上,以1972年中日建交以來,中國與日本在這44年時(shí)間內(nèi)發(fā)生的所有重大自然災(zāi)難報(bào)道為例,兩國不同的媒體分別從不同的角度,不同的方面,不同的報(bào)道立場(chǎng),不同的報(bào)道用詞和篇幅以及不同的報(bào)道風(fēng)格,對(duì)對(duì)方發(fā)生的災(zāi)難表現(xiàn)出各自所代表的態(tài)度,進(jìn)而探索中日之間外交關(guān)系在此階段的不同發(fā)展走向,從而在更深層次上看出中H之間的政治關(guān)系變化。第一章緒論部分,就本文的選題背景做了詳細(xì)的概述,并著重將研究?jī)?nèi)容和研究思路呈現(xiàn)在讀者面前,使讀者清晰明了的知曉研究建交以來中日之間對(duì)對(duì)方重大災(zāi)難報(bào)道對(duì)比的意義所在。第二章著重對(duì)比了中日媒體在進(jìn)行自然災(zāi)難性報(bào)道時(shí)的差異,利用內(nèi)容分析法,通過比較災(zāi)難發(fā)生時(shí)中日間不同的報(bào)道主是、報(bào)道版面、報(bào)道體裁、報(bào)道傾向、報(bào)道篇幅、報(bào)道視角、報(bào)道風(fēng)格這幾個(gè)方面,為下文深層次挖掘二者報(bào)道模式、報(bào)道理念的不同之處進(jìn)行鋪墊。第三章通過仔細(xì)分析中日間自然災(zāi)難性報(bào)道,對(duì)比所有有關(guān)自然災(zāi)難報(bào)道文章,深刻比較中日間新聞報(bào)道模式和報(bào)道理念的異同,從而為下文分析中日在建交44年來產(chǎn)生不同的報(bào)道模式和報(bào)道理念的原因埋下伏筆。第四章著重對(duì)中日媒體產(chǎn)生報(bào)道差異的原因進(jìn)行分析。經(jīng)過深刻分析之后,發(fā)現(xiàn)要根據(jù)不同的外交訴求、社會(huì)意識(shí)形態(tài)以及媒介性質(zhì)來分析造成中日之間的不同報(bào)道模式的原因。
[Abstract]:Generally speaking, different countries in the world of disaster reporting patterns are different. As an important part of news, disaster report, like news report, directly reflects the development of political attitude, international relations and diplomatic trend of various countries to a certain extent. Different patterns of catastrophic reporting are also the best barometer of international relations between countries. The so-called catastrophic news report, refers to the news media to each kind of disaster carries on the report. However, these reports are also classified as "natural disasters" and "man-made disasters." Natural disaster reports are often the focus of the media and the public because they occur without warning and are often accompanied by serious property and human losses, with more serious consequences, directly or indirectly, As a result, whenever a natural disaster occurs, the media will pay high-frequency attention to it. Based on the analysis of the previous research results, this paper takes all the major natural disasters reported by China and Japan in the period of 44 years since the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Japan in 1972 as an example. Different media of the two countries separately from different angles and different aspects. Different reporting positions, different reporting terms and space, and different reporting styles show their respective attitudes to the disasters that have occurred on the other side, and then explore the different development trends of diplomatic relations between China and Japan at this stage. In order to see in a deeper level between the political relationship between H changes. The first chapter introduces the background of this thesis, and presents the research contents and ideas in front of the readers. Let the reader understand clearly the significance of the comparison between China and Japan on the other side's major disaster reports since the establishment of diplomatic relations. The second chapter focuses on comparing the differences between Chinese and Japanese media in carrying out natural and disastrous reports. By using the content analysis method, by comparing the different reports between China and Japan at the time of the disaster, the main contents of the reports are, the layout, the genre, the tendency and the length of the reports. The angle of view and the style of the report pave the way for the following deep excavation of the reporting mode and the difference of the reporting idea. Chapter three compares the similarities and differences between Chinese and Japanese news reporting modes and concepts by carefully analyzing the natural disaster reports in China and comparing all the articles about natural disasters. Therefore, this paper lays a foundation for the analysis of the reasons for the different reporting models and reporting concepts since the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Japan 44 years ago. The fourth chapter focuses on the analysis of the reasons for the reporting differences between Chinese and Japanese media. After deep analysis, it is found that the reasons for the different reporting patterns between China and Japan should be analyzed according to different diplomatic demands, social ideology and media nature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G212

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 田雨霖;;日本媒體災(zāi)害性新聞報(bào)道的借鑒和啟示[J];才智;2016年30期

2 李遠(yuǎn);;中國災(zāi)難報(bào)道變遷分析[J];新聞研究導(dǎo)刊;2014年12期

3 王傳軍;;災(zāi)難性報(bào)道中的新聞倫理規(guī)范[J];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年S1期

4 杭月;;日本媒體災(zāi)難報(bào)道對(duì)中國媒體的啟示[J];新聞傳播;2014年02期

5 劉海濤;;中國災(zāi)難新聞報(bào)道理念的轉(zhuǎn)變[J];中國傳媒科技;2013年14期

6 班燕君;;災(zāi)難報(bào)道的分寸平衡與人文視角——日本《朝日新聞》地震報(bào)道的內(nèi)容分析[J];東南傳播;2013年06期

7 黃智知;;中日災(zāi)難報(bào)道的差異[J];新聞世界;2011年06期

8 董天策;章琴麗;;媒體定位與災(zāi)難新聞的報(bào)道視角——簡(jiǎn)析《人民日?qǐng)?bào)》、《南方都市報(bào)》對(duì)日本大地震的報(bào)道[J];今傳媒;2011年06期

9 涂曉華;;日本媒體地震報(bào)道及其啟示——以日本阪神大震災(zāi)、新o_大地震為例[J];國際新聞界;2010年07期

10 董天策;蔡慧;于小雪;;當(dāng)代中國災(zāi)難新聞報(bào)道模式的演變[J];新聞?dòng)浾?2010年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 陳驍;《人民日?qǐng)?bào)》災(zāi)難報(bào)道的歷史演變研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2016年

2 裴昱;中日?qǐng)?bào)紙災(zāi)難新聞報(bào)道比較研究[D];山西大學(xué);2013年

3 李明;災(zāi)難性新聞攝影倫理的研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2013年

4 宋瀅;《人民日?qǐng)?bào)》近十年災(zāi)難性新聞報(bào)道研究[D];新疆大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2371097