本文選題：后危機(jī)時(shí)代 + 媒介話語(yǔ)��； 參考：《新聞愛(ài)好者》2017年06期

【摘要】：在后危機(jī)時(shí)代中,媒體格局隨同經(jīng)濟(jì)、技術(shù)、政治與文化等諸多因素發(fā)生著巨大的變動(dòng),媒介話語(yǔ)的表達(dá)與傳播技術(shù)緊密結(jié)合在一起,使媒介話語(yǔ)表達(dá)中的視聽(tīng)結(jié)合、碎片化、極端化以及開(kāi)放與互動(dòng)性明顯。由于媒介話語(yǔ)表達(dá)中出現(xiàn)共鳴極化、媒介審判、群體盲思以及民粹主義現(xiàn)象,必然會(huì)產(chǎn)生媒介化風(fēng)險(xiǎn)危機(jī)。因此,必須加強(qiáng)媒介話語(yǔ)的互動(dòng)議程設(shè)置,完善媒介對(duì)話機(jī)制,加強(qiáng)媒介話語(yǔ)自律,促進(jìn)媒介話語(yǔ)之間的融合與互動(dòng),提升媒介話語(yǔ)治理能力建設(shè)。
[Abstract]:In the post-crisis era, the media pattern is undergoing tremendous changes along with many factors, such as economy, technology, politics and culture, and the expression of media discourse is closely combined with communication technology, which makes the audio-visual combination and fragmentation of media discourse expression. Extremes and openness and interactivity are evident. Due to the phenomenon of resonance polarization, media trial, group blindness and populism in the expression of media discourse, media risk crisis will inevitably arise. Therefore, we must strengthen the interactive agenda setting of media discourse, perfect the mechanism of media dialogue, strengthen the self-discipline of media discourse, promote the integration and interaction between media discourse, and enhance the construction of media discourse governance capacity.
【作者單位】： 泰國(guó)易三倉(cāng)大學(xué);浙江越秀外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金規(guī)劃課題:基層黨內(nèi)“選舉民主”與“協(xié)商民主”協(xié)同機(jī)制研究(13BDJ036) 浙江省社科規(guī)劃課題:多元輿論場(chǎng)中黨的輿情調(diào)控與引導(dǎo)機(jī)制研究(14NDJC003Z)的階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：G206

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 記者 方家喜;后危機(jī)時(shí)代中國(guó)面臨轉(zhuǎn)型挑戰(zhàn)[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)參考報(bào);2009年

2 廖卉;為經(jīng)濟(jì)進(jìn)一步回升向好提供智力支持[N];新華日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1942382