本文選題：敏感數(shù)據(jù) + 歐盟標(biāo)準(zhǔn)　； 參考：《新聞界》2017年06期

【摘要】：通過對92個國家和地區(qū)的最新隱私法規(guī)作比較分析,本文發(fā)現(xiàn):1.敏感信息/數(shù)據(jù)是個人隱私與數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)的核心,大多數(shù)國家和地區(qū)(80.34%)的法律體系中有明確定義或分類;2.這些定義或分類可概括為兩種模型:"歐盟標(biāo)準(zhǔn)"和"歐盟標(biāo)準(zhǔn)加犯罪記錄"。同時,本文對2004年6月至2016年6月以來中外200個規(guī)模最大的數(shù)據(jù)泄露案例作比較分析發(fā)現(xiàn),財務(wù)信息等個人數(shù)據(jù)雖不在多數(shù)國家的敏感數(shù)據(jù)之列,在現(xiàn)實中被盜取、侵犯和泄露的風(fēng)險、概率卻比敏感數(shù)據(jù)更高,成為一種"現(xiàn)實悖論"。作者運用西方學(xué)者關(guān)于全球性的"人類尊嚴(yán)"和"生命神圣"等"原生規(guī)范"解釋這種悖論與差異,并建議從隱私的"尊嚴(yán)"和"財產(chǎn)"雙重屬性視角重新定義敏感數(shù)據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Through a comparative analysis of the latest privacy laws in 92 countries and regions, this paper finds that: 1. Sensitive information / data is the core of personal privacy and data protection, and most countries and territories have clear definitions or classifications in their legal systems. These definitions or classifications can be summed up into two models: EU Standard and EU Standard plus Criminal record. At the same time, this paper makes a comparative analysis of 200 largest data leakage cases between China and foreign countries from June 2004 to June 2016. It is found that personal data, such as financial information, are stolen in reality, although they are not among the sensitive data in most countries. The risk of invasion and disclosure, however, is more likely than sensitive data, becoming a "paradox of reality". The author explains this paradox and difference by using the western scholars'"primary norms" such as "human dignity" and "sanctity of life", and suggests that sensitive data be redefined from the perspective of the dual attributes of "dignity" and "property" of privacy.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)新聞與傳播學(xué)院;武漢大學(xué)媒體發(fā)展研究中心;武漢大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學(xué)重點研究基地重大項目“一帶一路倡議與跨文化傳播”(16JJD860004)
【分類號】：D913;G201
，

本文編號：1913816