本文選題：公共信息資源 + 城鄉(xiāng)二元結(jié)構(gòu)��； 參考：《成都理工大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：公共信息資源對每一個人都有著重大的意義,公共信息資源意味著民眾都有平等接近的權(quán)利和可能。而一旦公共信息資源分配不均,便會帶來發(fā)展的不均衡。目前,在我國社會中,城鄉(xiāng)公共信息資源分配不均所帶來的問題已較凸出,并加劇著城鄉(xiāng)居民的矛盾和城鄉(xiāng)社會協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的不穩(wěn)定性。因此,本文要探討的是導(dǎo)致城鄉(xiāng)公共信息資源配置不均衡的原因,同時政府應(yīng)該采取怎樣的對策來緩解這種不均衡的狀態(tài)以實現(xiàn)城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展。本研究從管理制度、經(jīng)濟背景、傳播機制、基層服務(wù)能力、市場參與程度以及受眾解碼資源等視角,通過問卷調(diào)查、深度訪談法獲得婁底市扶青社區(qū)與梓龍鄉(xiāng)的具體數(shù)據(jù),全方位考察和探析城鄉(xiāng)公共信息資源分配不均的原因和對策。通過具體的分析,得出以下研究結(jié)論:第一,我國城鄉(xiāng)二元體制結(jié)構(gòu)是城鄉(xiāng)公共信息資源分配不均最根本的原因,城鄉(xiāng)二元體制下以城市為首要服務(wù)目標(biāo)的各種政策從源頭上導(dǎo)致了城市和農(nóng)村地區(qū)公共信息資源分布的不均衡;第二,二元體制下的城鄉(xiāng)二元經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)則是城鄉(xiāng)公共信息資源分配不均的直接原因,經(jīng)濟投入和經(jīng)濟能力是公共信息資源建設(shè)的基礎(chǔ),城鄉(xiāng)經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)失衡導(dǎo)致城鄉(xiāng)進行公共信息資源建設(shè)的投入失衡,農(nóng)村落后于城市,且經(jīng)濟收入高的城市居民比經(jīng)濟收入低的農(nóng)村居民對公共信息的需求量更多、需求層次更高;第三,農(nóng)村落后且單一的公共信息傳播機制以及農(nóng)村公共信息服務(wù)能力較低的基層部門是限制農(nóng)村居民獲取更多公共信息資源的重要障礙,城市的基層公共信息資源服務(wù)和管理能力強于農(nóng)村,城市的信息傳播系統(tǒng)也要比農(nóng)村的信息傳播系統(tǒng)更加豐富和靈活;第四,在農(nóng)村的信息資源體系中,市場參與程度低、缺乏豐富的傳播主體;第五,在解碼能力方面,農(nóng)村居民相應(yīng)的經(jīng)濟收入以及媒介使用的能力低于城市居民,獲得的公共信息資源質(zhì)量及數(shù)量不及城市居民所獲得的。因此,城鄉(xiāng)公共信息資源的分配不均不只是某一個信息資源配置的環(huán)節(jié)存在漏洞,更是一個系統(tǒng)性、綜合性且亟待解決的問題。針對上述問題,本研究著重從經(jīng)濟的投入、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的建設(shè)、基層服務(wù)模式的改善以及受眾獲取公共信息的能力等方面提出解決問題的策略。第一,通過政策的調(diào)整,消除導(dǎo)致城鄉(xiāng)公共信息資源分配不均衡的體制機制障礙,改革和完善政府公共信息資源的配置模式及監(jiān)督體制,讓城鄉(xiāng)居民在事實上有均等的機會接觸公共信息資源,獲得相同的發(fā)展能力;第二,加強農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟建設(shè),提高農(nóng)村居民對公共信息的需求層次,同時通過經(jīng)濟發(fā)展彌補農(nóng)村在獲取公共信息資源方面的短板,加強信息基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的建設(shè),完善布局,提高信息基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的利用率;第三,推動農(nóng)村互聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的建設(shè),利用新媒體的新力量改善農(nóng)村公共信息的傳播環(huán)境;第四,大力加強農(nóng)村基層工作人員公共信息資源的管理與服務(wù)能力,建立全面的考核機制提高基層工作人員的媒介素養(yǎng)以及責(zé)任意識;第五,完善農(nóng)村公共信息資源管理的監(jiān)督和評價機制,制定全面、具體、可操作的方針;第六,開啟農(nóng)村信息體系的市場化構(gòu)建,活躍農(nóng)村地區(qū)信息市場氣氛;第七,作為農(nóng)村公共信息資源配置的最終目的地,農(nóng)村居民一方面要通過接受義務(wù)教育獲得更多的知識以更好的吸收公共信息,同時還要養(yǎng)成主動獲取公共信息的態(tài)度,習(xí)得科學(xué)的獲取路徑,掌握現(xiàn)代化的媒介方式,改變自身在公共信息資源配置過程中的弱勢地位。
[Abstract]:Public information resources have great significance for everyone. Public information resources mean that people have equal rights and possibilities. Once the distribution of public information resources is not evenly distributed, it will bring unbalanced development. At present, in our society, the problems brought about by the uneven distribution of public information resources in urban and rural areas have been more prominent. The contradiction between urban and rural residents and the instability of the coordinated development of urban and rural society. Therefore, this paper is to discuss the causes of uneven distribution of urban and rural public information resources. At the same time, what countermeasures should be taken by the government to mitigate this unbalanced state in order to achieve the overall development of urban and rural areas. This study is from management system, economic background and communication. Mechanism, basic service capacity, market participation and audience decoding resources and so on, through questionnaire survey, in-depth interview method to obtain the specific data of Loudi Fu Qing community and Zi Long Township, comprehensive investigation and analysis of urban and rural public information resources distribution uneven reasons and countermeasures. Through specific analysis, the following conclusions are drawn: first The urban and rural two yuan structure in China is the most fundamental reason for the unequal distribution of urban and rural public information resources. The various policies of the urban and rural two yuan system with the city as the primary service target lead to the imbalance in the distribution of public information resources in urban and rural areas, and the urban and rural economic structure under the second, second yuan system is the urban and rural public. The direct reason for the uneven distribution of common information resources is that the economic input and economic ability are the basis of the construction of public information resources. The imbalance of urban and rural economic structure leads to the imbalance in the construction of public information resources in urban and rural areas, and the rural residents with high income are less than the economic income of the rural residents. More demand and higher level of demand; third, the backward and single public information dissemination mechanism in rural areas and the low level of rural public information service capacity is an important obstacle to restrict the rural residents to obtain more public information resources. The service and management ability of the basic public information resources in the city is stronger than the rural, the information dissemination of the city. The system is also more rich and flexible than the rural information dissemination system. Fourth, in the rural information resources system, the market participation is low, the lack of rich communication main body; fifth, in the decoding capacity, the corresponding economic income of rural residents and the use of media is lower than urban residents, the quality of public information resources and the quality of public information obtained. Therefore, the distribution of urban and rural public information resources is not only a loophole in the link of a certain information resource allocation, but also a systematic, comprehensive and urgent problem. In view of the above problems, this study focuses on the investment, infrastructure construction and improvement of the basic service mode. As well as the ability of the audience to obtain public information, some strategies are put forward to solve the problem. First, through the adjustment of the policy, the institutional mechanism, which leads to the unbalanced distribution of public information resources in urban and rural areas, is eliminated, and the configuration mode and supervision system of the government public information resources are reformed and perfected to make urban and rural residents have equal access to the equal opportunities in fact. Public information resources, obtain the same development ability; second, strengthen the rural economic construction, improve the level of rural residents' demand for public information, at the same time make up for the short board in obtaining public information resources in rural areas through economic development, strengthen the construction of information infrastructure, improve the layout and improve the utilization of information infrastructure; third, Promote the construction of rural Internet, use new media new forces to improve the communication environment of rural public information; fourth, strengthen the management and service capacity of public information resources of rural grass-roots workers, and establish a comprehensive assessment mechanism to improve the media literacy and responsibility consciousness of the grass-roots workers; fifth, improve the rural public. The supervision and evaluation mechanism of information resources management, formulate comprehensive, specific and operable principles; sixth, open the market of rural information system, active rural information market atmosphere; seventh, as the final destination of the allocation of rural public information resources, rural residents should get more knowledge by accepting compulsory education. To know better to absorb public information, and to develop the attitude of acquiring public information actively, acquire the path of scientific acquisition, grasp the modern media mode, and change its weak position in the process of the allocation of public information resources.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：成都理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：G203

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 張欣毅;;政府主導(dǎo)是公共信息資源共建共享的基礎(chǔ)與保障[J];圖書館理論與實踐;2010年04期

2 厲以寧;;論城鄉(xiāng)二元體制改革[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2008年02期

3 夏義X;;公共信息資源市場配置的實踐與問題[J];中國圖書館學(xué)報;2007年04期

4 夏義X;;政府信息資源管理與公共信息資源管理比較分析[J];情報科學(xué);2006年04期

5 楊秀丹;白獻陽;;公共信息資源管理研究[J];圖書館論壇;2005年06期

6 吳建;西方新聞發(fā)言人制度起因探析[J];新聞界;2005年01期

7 張欣毅;觸摸那只無形的巨手——基于公共信息資源及其認(rèn)知機制的認(rèn)識論(下)[J];圖書館理論與實踐;2003年02期

，

本文編號：1855685