本文選題：城市傳播 + 空間��； 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以中共中央和國務(wù)院頒布的推廣“街區(qū)制”的政策為切入點,將封閉式社區(qū)過渡到開放式社區(qū)作為城市空間重構(gòu)的一個重要表現(xiàn),以城市傳播中的幾個關(guān)鍵要點進行深入,深入探討了“重構(gòu)”中的傳播學(xué)意義。本文主要采用文獻研究法對已有的城市社會學(xué)文獻和近年城市傳播論文等理論資源進行綜合,結(jié)合本次政策實施中的相關(guān)要點,在理清社區(qū)空間形態(tài)重構(gòu)的同時,力圖回歸到城市傳播本身的思考上來,本文分為三個部分對此進行系統(tǒng)闡述和分析。在背景部分指出了現(xiàn)在城市傳播的研究現(xiàn)狀,城市傳播一詞在復(fù)旦學(xué)者使用前后,其概念和意義有較大的轉(zhuǎn)折,在之前的使用中,“城市傳播”更多集中于一種符號系統(tǒng),一種媒介再現(xiàn)的理論框架柱之中,而復(fù)旦學(xué)者重新整理它的概念之時,便加入了對于整個主流傳播學(xué)的反思,通過實體空間的強調(diào)對虛擬空間的熱情追捧進行祛魅,通過后現(xiàn)代主體觀的接受對理性主義主體觀的思維方式提出質(zhì)疑,并以民主政治的基本城市想象為模板,將城市視作融合虛擬和實體雙重空間,來拓展對于媒介和傳播的再認(rèn)識。第一部分將城市傳播劃分為三個維度來理解:作為媒介的城市;實體空間的意義;以存在主義哲學(xué)為基礎(chǔ)的主體觀和身體觀。通過三個維度的闡釋,將現(xiàn)有城市傳播理論中的傳播概念與主流傳播系統(tǒng)的一些思維進行比較,這里不是對兩者的觀點區(qū)異進行逐條對比,而是以城市傳播為主體對象,在闡釋其基本內(nèi)涵的時候,援引經(jīng)驗學(xué)派之觀點進行旁證和對比。第二部分是對于兩種社區(qū)形態(tài)的城市傳播學(xué)考量,將上述三個維度融合其中進行分析,討論了兩種形態(tài)對于構(gòu)建城市共同體的不同意義,同時特別指出了“圍墻”和“道路”的意義,這兩點既是以往城市社會學(xué)經(jīng)常關(guān)注的論述對象,又是本次推廣街區(qū)制所必須面對的兩個基本話題,同時兼具了實體性、物質(zhì)化基本形態(tài),且與社區(qū)發(fā)展的交流問題密切相關(guān)。圍墻不僅僅是一個泥土混合物,在視覺效果上、身體觀上、邊界劃分上都有其獨特的傳播內(nèi)涵。道路更是如此,我們不僅要將道路視作城市傳播的血管,道路權(quán)的占有以及道路因何而建也都體現(xiàn)了道路在現(xiàn)代城市所承擔(dān)的意義和共享的價值。第三部分則是一種理論延展,提出了想象城市的重要作用和價值,一定程度上正是不同的想象構(gòu)造了不同的理論指向。整合城市的方向乃是建立一種多元化的共同體,但是城市傳播對此只做分析,不做保證,這也正體現(xiàn)了本文一貫堅持的一個主張——傳播的中立化研究思維,我們無法將傳播寄予一種城市規(guī)劃中,這是學(xué)科性質(zhì)決定的,城市傳播的基本在于從上述三個維度分析傳播的狀態(tài)和城市傳播形態(tài),這些樣態(tài)是受到多重因素“自然”發(fā)生的,主體性的構(gòu)建也是在這種狀態(tài)下進行延伸的,主體從未改變,改變的是我們以重新的視角、更有闡釋力的視角來解答主體性的問題。
[Abstract]:This paper, based on the policy of promoting the "block system" issued by the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council, takes the closed community to an open community as an important manifestation of urban space reconstruction, and deeply discusses the significance of communication in the "Reconstruction". This article mainly adopts the literature. The research method, which combines the existing urban sociology literature and the theoretical resources of urban communication in recent years, combines the relevant key points in the implementation of this policy, and tries to return to the thinking of urban communication itself while reconstructing the reconstruction of the community space form. This article is divided into three parts to systematically elaborate and analyze it. Some of the current research status of urban communication is pointed out. The concept and significance of urban communication have a great turning point before and after the use of Fudan scholars. In the previous use, "urban communication" is more concentrated on a symbol system, a theoretical framework of media reproduction, while Fudan scholar reorganizes its concept. We have joined the reflection on the whole mainstream communication, and disenchanted the enthusiasm of the virtual space through the emphasis of the entity space. Through the acceptance of the postmodern subjective view, the thinking mode of the rationalist view is questioned, and the basic city imagination of democracy is taken as a template, and the city is regarded as the dual space of fusion of virtual and entity. To expand the understanding of media and communication. The first part divides urban communication into three dimensions: the city as the medium, the meaning of the entity space, the concept of subject and the body view based on the existentialist philosophy. Through the interpretation of the three dimensions, the communication concept and the mainstream communication system in the existing urban transmission theory will be interpreted. Some thoughts are compared. This is not a comparison between the point of view of the two, but the main subject of urban communication. In the interpretation of its basic connotation, the second part is the city communication study of the two community forms and the fusion of the above three dimensions. The significance of the two forms for the construction of the urban community is discussed, and the significance of the "wall" and "road" is particularly pointed out. These two points are not only the object of the former urban sociology, but also the two basic topics that the block system must face, and both physical and materialized. The basic form is closely related to the communication problem of community development. The wall is not only a soil mixture, but also has its unique communication connotation in visual effect, physical view and boundary division. The road is more so. We should not only regard the road as the blood tube of the urban communication, the possession of the road rights, and the road, but also the road. The significance and value shared by the road in the modern city are presented. The third part is a theory extension, which puts forward the important role and value of the imaginary city. To a certain extent, it is the different imaginations that construct different theoretical points. The direction of the integration of the city is to establish a diversified community, but the city spreads it. It is only an analysis and no guarantee, which is also an embodiment of the assertion that this article has consistently adhered to the neutralization of research thinking. We can not send the communication to a city planning, which is determined by the nature of the subject. The basic of the city communication is to analyze the state of communication and the form of urban communication from the above three dimensions. These patterns are Subject to the multiple factors "nature", the construction of the subjectivity is also extended in this state. The subject has never changed, and the change is that we answer the question of subjectivity from a new perspective and more explanatory power.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G206

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王振坡;張穎;梅林;;我國城市推廣街區(qū)制的路徑及對策研究[J];學(xué)習(xí)與實踐;2016年07期

2 孫瑋;;微信:中國人的“在世存有”[J];學(xué)術(shù)月刊;2015年12期

3 復(fù)旦大學(xué)信息與傳播研究中心課題組;孫瑋;;城市傳播:重建傳播與人的關(guān)系[J];新聞與傳播研究;2015年07期

4 陳蔚鎮(zhèn);孫辰;;開放社區(qū)的空間特質(zhì)及規(guī)劃導(dǎo)引——以3個上海社區(qū)為例[J];建筑學(xué)報;2015年06期

5 孫瑋;;為了重建的反思:傳播研究的范式創(chuàng)新[J];新聞記者;2014年12期

6 尹帥平;;中國城市傳播研究綜述[J];東南傳播;2014年02期

7 孫瑋;;傳播:編織關(guān)系網(wǎng)絡(luò)——基于城市研究的分析[J];新聞大學(xué);2013年03期

8 孫瑋;;作為媒介的城市:傳播意義再闡釋[J];新聞大學(xué);2012年02期

9 孫瑋;;作為媒介的外灘:上�，F(xiàn)代性的發(fā)生與成長[J];新聞大學(xué);2011年04期

10 宋偉軒;;封閉社區(qū)研究進展[J];城市規(guī)劃學(xué)刊;2010年04期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 孫瑋 ;謝靜;;城市傳播：傳播研究的范式創(chuàng)新[N];中國社會科學(xué)報;2015年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張堯均;隱喻的身體—梅洛—龐蒂的身體現(xiàn)象學(xué)研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：1816656