本文選題：新女性　切入點(diǎn)：舊道德　出處：《新聞與傳播研究》2017年01期

【摘要】：1906年嶺南各大報(bào)刊集中報(bào)道私娼梁亞玲假冒女學(xué)生事件的輿論紛爭(zhēng)映照了符號(hào)化的晚清女學(xué)。晚清女性解放的中心是興女學(xué),晚清輿論對(duì)女學(xué)及女學(xué)生的關(guān)注有"過(guò)度"之嫌,女學(xué)在晚清輿論中引起廣泛論爭(zhēng)的符號(hào)意義更大于實(shí)際意義,女德是這種符號(hào)的集中體現(xiàn)。女學(xué)被拔高的畸形之尊不是對(duì)女性權(quán)利的真正解放,而是男性精英們?cè)趯で缶韧鰣D存的道路中找到的一條捷徑,這場(chǎng)轟轟烈烈的興女學(xué)之舉,并非以女性解放為宗旨,更像是救亡途中祭出的一面旗幟。
[Abstract]:In 1906, various newspapers and periodicals in Lingnan concentrated on reporting the incident of impersonation of female students by Liang Yaling, a private sex worker, which reflected the symbolized female school of the late Qing Dynasty.The center of female liberation in the late Qing Dynasty was to exhilarate the female school, and the public opinion in the late Qing Dynasty paid too much attention to the female study and the female students. The symbol meaning of the female school caused extensive controversy in the public opinion of the late Qing Dynasty was more than the actual meaning, and the female morality was the concentrated embodiment of this kind of symbol.The exalted deformity of women's studies is not a true liberation of women's rights, but a shortcut found by the male elite in their search for salvation from the nation. This vigorous act of women's learning does not aim at the emancipation of women.More like the sacrifice of a flag on the way to salvation.
【作者單位】： 暨南大學(xué)新聞與傳播學(xué)院;廣州大學(xué)廣府文化研究中心;
【基金】：中國(guó)博士后基金資助項(xiàng)目(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):2015M582478)的階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：C913.68;G219.29
，

本文編號(hào)：1716961