本文選題：PM.　切入點：觀念史　出處：《國際新聞界》2017年06期

【摘要】：如何把握觀念史研究特別強調(diào)的觀念起源、存在形式及其歷史過程,知識社會學提供了一種重要的理論路徑,其方法論上的操作基礎就是探討"觀念的社會影響""觀念的生成機制"和"觀念的群體意識"。作為一種被科學話語精心構(gòu)筑的意指概念,PM2.5的"出場"意味著一場深刻的知識賦權(quán)行為,人們得以通過對PM2.5的識別來把握霧霾及其環(huán)境觀念。然而,秸稈焚燒事件打破了城市話語和鄉(xiāng)村話語長久以來的對話關系,PM2.5深層的話語實踐和社會文化實踐均呈現(xiàn)出明確的階層屬性。PM2.5議題分析過程提供了一種可供借鑒的觀念史研究的修辭學方法路徑,具體表現(xiàn)為對六大修辭命題——修辭資源、話語形式、框架形態(tài)、接合機制、修辭實踐和階層批判的識別和分析。
[Abstract]:How to grasp the origin, the form of existence and the historical process of the idea, which is specially emphasized in the study of the history of ideas, provides an important theoretical path in the sociology of knowledge. The operational basis of its methodology is to explore the social influence of ideas, the formation mechanism of ideas and the group consciousness of ideas. As a carefully constructed concept of scientific discourse, "appearance" of PM2.5 means a field. Deep knowledge empowerment behavior, People are able to grasp haze and its environmental concepts through the recognition of PM2.5. However, Straw Burning has broken the long-held dialogue between urban discourse and rural discourse. The deep discourse practice and sociocultural practice of PM2.5 have presented a clear class attribute. PM2.5 issue analysis process can be used for reference. The rhetorical approach to the study of the History of ideas, It is embodied in the identification and analysis of six rhetorical propositions-rhetorical resources, discourse forms, frame forms, joint mechanisms, rhetorical practices and stratum criticism.
【作者單位】： 暨南大學新聞與傳播學院;復旦大學信息與傳播研究中心;
【基金】：國家社科基金一般項目《環(huán)境傳播的公共修辭與符號化治理策略研究》(項目編號:17BXW008)的研究成果~~
【分類號】：G206
，

本文編號：1672032