【摘要】：韓國(guó)詩(shī)話(huà)產(chǎn)生之前的歷史文化典籍《三國(guó)史記》《三國(guó)遺事》等,深受中國(guó)史書(shū)的影響而具有史傳敘事傳統(tǒng);兩種典籍記述的史實(shí)成為了后世詩(shī)話(huà)的原典,兩種典籍中的部分記述頗具詩(shī)話(huà)形態(tài)特點(diǎn),可見(jiàn)韓國(guó)詩(shī)話(huà)也具有兩部典籍直接影響的可能性;中國(guó)詩(shī)話(huà)書(shū)籍的引入觸發(fā)韓國(guó)詩(shī)話(huà)文體觀念的形成及創(chuàng)作,但是,兩部韓國(guó)史書(shū)與韓國(guó)詩(shī)話(huà)具有很大的共同性,即韓國(guó)詩(shī)話(huà)具有不同于中國(guó)詩(shī)話(huà)的鮮明特色:史實(shí)性、國(guó)家功利性、比較文學(xué)視野。
[Abstract]:The historical and cultural books such as the Historical Records of the three Kingdoms, the Legacy of the three Kingdoms, etc. before the birth of Korean poetry, are deeply influenced by the Chinese historical books and have the tradition of historical biography and narrative, and the historical facts of the two kinds of books have become the original code of the later poetry. Some of the two books have the characteristics of poetic form, which shows that Korean poetry has the possibility of direct influence of two classical books. The introduction of Chinese poetry books triggers the formation and creation of the concept of Korean poetic style, but, The two Korean history books have great commonality with Korean poetry, that is, Korean poetry has distinct characteristics that are different from Chinese poetry: historical facts, national utilitarianism, and comparative literature perspective.
【作者單位】： 延邊大學(xué)漢語(yǔ)言文化學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I312.072

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 桂強(qiáng);;四大文明古國(guó)史詩(shī)與史傳產(chǎn)生與發(fā)展的差異性谫論[J];消費(fèi)導(dǎo)刊;2008年09期

2 王成軍;神話(huà)·虛構(gòu)·紀(jì)實(shí)——中西小說(shuō)敘事詩(shī)學(xué)的思考[J];南京師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2238693