神話(huà)原型批評(píng)視角下的《金色筆記》研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-10 06:22
【摘要】：《金色筆記》是當(dāng)代英國(guó)著名的女作家多麗絲·萊辛(Doris Lessing)的代表作。本文從神話(huà)原型批評(píng)視角對(duì)《金色筆記》與西方神話(huà)對(duì)應(yīng)關(guān)系進(jìn)行闡釋,指出該作品所蘊(yùn)含的有關(guān)人類(lèi)生命意義的主題:小說(shuō)中主人公人格回歸的過(guò)程,實(shí)質(zhì)上是自我與他人、自我與社會(huì)之間的抗?fàn)幣c和解的過(guò)程。作品表達(dá)了人類(lèi)只有通過(guò)抗?fàn)庍_(dá)成和解,才能獲得生命的價(jià)值和意義,并且這是解決現(xiàn)代社會(huì)一系列矛盾與沖突的必由之路。從這層意義上來(lái)看,小說(shuō)具有現(xiàn)代神話(huà)的特質(zhì)。本文主要依據(jù)弗萊的神話(huà)原型理論,從意象原型、人物原型和敘事結(jié)構(gòu)原型三個(gè)方面對(duì)《金色筆記》進(jìn)行探討。首先,本文分析了作品中頻繁出現(xiàn)的海、水、鴿子等意象,通過(guò)對(duì)這些意象的原型和現(xiàn)代意義的解讀,揭示它們所體現(xiàn)的自我與他人和解的象征意義。其次,本文通過(guò)對(duì)小說(shuō)中的主要人物與神話(huà)人物的對(duì)應(yīng)關(guān)系的分析,指出萊辛將自我與社會(huì)的和解看作是一種自我救贖的方式。最后,本文分析了小說(shuō)的敘事結(jié)構(gòu)原型,指出小說(shuō)四本筆記中的《黑色筆記》和《紅色筆記》的敘事結(jié)構(gòu)是弗萊所提出的悲劇、嘲弄和諷刺的兩種敘事結(jié)構(gòu)的映射,體現(xiàn)了神話(huà)敘事模式下人類(lèi)與外部世界的抗?fàn)�。從神�?huà)原型批評(píng)的視角解讀《金色筆記》,本文得出如下結(jié)論:小說(shuō)對(duì)神話(huà)意象、人物、敘事結(jié)構(gòu)原型的運(yùn)用,不僅展示了萊辛高超的藝術(shù)創(chuàng)作功底和表現(xiàn)力,而且增強(qiáng)了小說(shuō)的深刻性和可讀性。經(jīng)由這些方式,萊辛將傳統(tǒng)與當(dāng)代、神話(huà)與現(xiàn)實(shí)很好地結(jié)合在一起,使得《金色筆記》成為世界文學(xué)史上具有永恒魅力的藝術(shù)作品。
[Abstract]:The Golden Notebook is the masterpiece of Doris Lessing (Doris Lessing), a famous contemporary British woman writer. From the perspective of archetypal criticism of mythology, this paper interprets the corresponding relationship between Golden Notes and Western mythology, and points out that the theme of this work is the meaning of human life: the process of the return of the protagonist's personality in the novel is in essence the process of the return of the protagonist's personality to himself and others. The process of struggle and reconciliation between self and society. The works express that only through the struggle to achieve reconciliation, human beings can obtain the value and significance of life, and this is the only way to solve a series of contradictions and conflicts in modern society. In this sense, the novel has the characteristics of modern mythology. Based on Frey's mythological archetypal theory, this paper probes into Golden Notes from three aspects: image archetype, character prototype and narrative structure prototype. Firstly, this paper analyzes the images of sea, water, pigeon and so on, and reveals the symbolic meaning of self-reconciliation through the interpretation of the archetypal and modern meaning of these images. Secondly, through the analysis of the correspondence between the main characters and the mythical characters in the novel, the author points out that Lessing regards the reconciliation between himself and society as a way of self-redemption. Finally, this paper analyzes the prototype of the narrative structure of the novel, and points out that the narrative structure of "Black Notes" and "Red Notes" in the four books of the novel is the reflection of the tragedy, ridicule and satire of the two narrative structures put forward by Fry. It reflects the struggle between human beings and the outside world under the mythological narrative mode. From the perspective of archetypal criticism of mythology, this paper draws the following conclusions: the use of mythical images, characters and narrative structure archetypes in novels not only shows Lessing's superb artistic creation skills and expressive power, Moreover, it enhances the profundity and readability of the novel. In these ways, Lessing combines tradition with contemporary, mythology and reality, making Golden Notebook a work of art with eternal charm in the history of world literature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I561.074
[Abstract]:The Golden Notebook is the masterpiece of Doris Lessing (Doris Lessing), a famous contemporary British woman writer. From the perspective of archetypal criticism of mythology, this paper interprets the corresponding relationship between Golden Notes and Western mythology, and points out that the theme of this work is the meaning of human life: the process of the return of the protagonist's personality in the novel is in essence the process of the return of the protagonist's personality to himself and others. The process of struggle and reconciliation between self and society. The works express that only through the struggle to achieve reconciliation, human beings can obtain the value and significance of life, and this is the only way to solve a series of contradictions and conflicts in modern society. In this sense, the novel has the characteristics of modern mythology. Based on Frey's mythological archetypal theory, this paper probes into Golden Notes from three aspects: image archetype, character prototype and narrative structure prototype. Firstly, this paper analyzes the images of sea, water, pigeon and so on, and reveals the symbolic meaning of self-reconciliation through the interpretation of the archetypal and modern meaning of these images. Secondly, through the analysis of the correspondence between the main characters and the mythical characters in the novel, the author points out that Lessing regards the reconciliation between himself and society as a way of self-redemption. Finally, this paper analyzes the prototype of the narrative structure of the novel, and points out that the narrative structure of "Black Notes" and "Red Notes" in the four books of the novel is the reflection of the tragedy, ridicule and satire of the two narrative structures put forward by Fry. It reflects the struggle between human beings and the outside world under the mythological narrative mode. From the perspective of archetypal criticism of mythology, this paper draws the following conclusions: the use of mythical images, characters and narrative structure archetypes in novels not only shows Lessing's superb artistic creation skills and expressive power, Moreover, it enhances the profundity and readability of the novel. In these ways, Lessing combines tradition with contemporary, mythology and reality, making Golden Notebook a work of art with eternal charm in the history of world literature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I561.074
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王森林;;索爾·格林的“詛咒”與《金色筆記》的主題[J];海南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年09期
2 孔德猛;;從《俄狄浦斯王》看理性與命運(yùn)的沖突——以俄狄浦斯能否自救為視角[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2016年05期
3 肖錦龍;;拷問(wèn)人性——再論《金色筆記》的主題[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)研究;2012年02期
4 錢(qián)虹;;《金色筆記》中愛(ài)情悲劇的精神分析解讀[J];浙江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期
5 肖慶華;;多麗絲·萊辛研究的地域性差異[J];重慶師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期
6 蘇忱;;多麗絲·萊辛與當(dāng)代伊德里斯·沙赫的蘇菲主義哲學(xué)[J];四川外語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期
7 莫運(yùn)平;;“成人”的悲劇:俄狄浦斯王悲劇新解[J];戲劇文學(xué);2007年05期
8 施e，
本文編號(hào)：2233643
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/2233643.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著
