本文選題：《金色筆記》 + 萊辛　； 參考：《中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文認(rèn)為,多麗絲·萊辛的《金色筆記》是后現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)向的文學(xué)記述,借助元小說的手法展現(xiàn)了二十世紀(jì)中后頁文學(xué)創(chuàng)作和社會政治從現(xiàn)代主義轉(zhuǎn)向后現(xiàn)代主義的全過程。在這個過程反映出,英國左派運(yùn)動逐漸式微,是原左派知識分子陷入精神危機(jī)并走向后現(xiàn)代主義的深層原因�！督鹕P記》的主角,女作家安娜·沃爾夫先后創(chuàng)作了三部作品,即《戰(zhàn)爭邊緣》、《第三者的影子》和《自由女性》,形成“小說中的小說”,其間夾以創(chuàng)作前、中、后安娜的個人經(jīng)歷、政治生活、安娜本人對文學(xué)創(chuàng)作的反思與其他人對作品的評論。以每一部“小說中的小說”為核心,《金色筆記》中的后現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)向可以大致分成三個階段。本文以三個章節(jié)分別論述這三個階段。首先,后現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)向始于對現(xiàn)代主義敘事的解構(gòu)。通過將現(xiàn)代主義文本《戰(zhàn)爭邊緣》與黑色筆記中安娜真正的經(jīng)歷進(jìn)行并置,反映虛假的現(xiàn)代主義文本對后現(xiàn)代現(xiàn)實(shí)的扭曲。安娜在自我批判中正式與現(xiàn)代主義決裂。其次,安娜所積極參與的共產(chǎn)主義運(yùn)動的失敗促使她投入以女性主義為代表的邊緣政治中,并創(chuàng)作實(shí)驗(yàn)性的作品《第三者的影子》,這是她轉(zhuǎn)向后現(xiàn)代過程中的半成品。最后,《自由女性》以及最終形成的“金色筆記”標(biāo)志著后現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)向的最終完成。安娜在文學(xué)創(chuàng)作手法和政治思想上倒向后現(xiàn)代主義,消除了自我與社會的爭吵,從精神崩潰中痊愈。本文從馬克思主義的角度剖析后現(xiàn)代主義政治學(xué),引用伊格爾頓、馬爾庫塞、�？碌壤碚摷业挠^點(diǎn),認(rèn)為后現(xiàn)代主義是一種“破而不立”的政治學(xué),反對一切主導(dǎo)和普遍性的原則,而非提出真正的解決方案。這是《金色筆記》矛盾結(jié)局的內(nèi)在原因。
[Abstract]:This paper holds that Doris Lessing's Golden Notebook is a postmodern turn of literary narration, which shows the whole process of literary creation and social politics from modernism to postmodernism in the middle of the 20th century by means of metafiction. This process reflects the gradual decline of the British leftist movement, which is the deep reason why the former leftist intellectuals fell into spiritual crisis and advanced to postmodernism. The protagonist of Golden Notebook, female writer An Na Wolfe, has created three works one after another. "the edge of war", "the shadow of a third party," and "free women" form "novels in novels," intertwined with personal experiences, political life, before, after, and after the creation of An Na. An Na's own reflection on literary creation and others' comments on his works. With each novel as the core, the postmodern turn in Golden Notebook can be roughly divided into three stages. This paper discusses the three stages in three chapters. First, the post-modern turn begins with the deconstruction of modernist narration. By juxtaposing the modernist text "the Edge of War" with the true experience of An Na in the black notes, it reflects the distortion of the postmodern reality in the false modernist text. An Na breaks with modernism in his self-criticism. Secondly, the failure of the communist movement in which An Na was actively involved prompted her to engage in the marginal politics represented by feminism and to create an experimental work, the shadow of a third party, which was a semi-finished product of her transition to the post-modern era. Finally, Free Women and the final formation of the Golden Notebook marked the final completion of the post-modern turn. An Na reversed to postmodernism in literary creation techniques and political thoughts, eliminated the quarrel between himself and society, and recovered from the collapse of spirit. This paper analyzes postmodernism politics from the angle of Marxism, citing the views of Eagleton, Marcuse, Foucault and other theorists, thinks that postmodernism is a kind of political science of "breaking but not standing". Oppose all principles of dominance and universality, rather than come up with real solutions. This is the inner cause of the contradictory ending of the Golden Notebook.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：I561.074

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周桂君;;跨越四面楚歌中的危機(jī)——《金色筆記》中安娜精神崩潰的原因探析[J];外語學(xué)刊;2015年01期

2 傅燕暉;;英國維多利亞時代女作家的“責(zé)任”之說——從《夏洛蒂·勃朗特傳》談起[J];國外文學(xué);2014年02期

3 程謙;;論多麗絲·萊辛小說《金色筆記》的對話性[J];沈陽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2013年02期

4 劉金保;林琳;;自由追求與生存困境——從《金色筆記》看多麗絲·萊辛的女權(quán)主義思想[J];外語學(xué)刊;2012年05期

5 陳紅梅;;《金色筆記》的空間敘事與后現(xiàn)代主題演繹[J];外國文學(xué)研究;2012年03期

6 盧婧;;《金色筆記》中的“身體”隱喻解讀[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年03期

7 肖錦龍;;拷問人性——再論《金色筆記》的主題[J];外國文學(xué)研究;2012年02期

8 馬龍?jiān)?;婚姻不能承受愛之輕——《金色筆記》中萊辛的婚姻倫理觀解讀[J];外語教學(xué);2011年01期

9 印玲;;從《金色筆記》看多麗絲·萊辛的歷史書寫[J];當(dāng)代外國文學(xué);2010年03期

10 楊士虎;王小博;;《金色筆記》中的后現(xiàn)代不確定性[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2010年02期

，

本文編號：2040145