本文選題：金裕貞 + 蔡萬(wàn)植　； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：金裕貞和蔡萬(wàn)植是韓國(guó)20世紀(jì)三十年代重要的小說(shuō)家。眾所周知,20世紀(jì)30年代,日本強(qiáng)化了對(duì)韓國(guó)的殖民地圍堵政策。在這種暗淡的現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)中,韓國(guó)的作家們用各自的方式尋找著拯救韓國(guó)文學(xué)的出路。作為韓國(guó)30年代重要的小說(shuō)家,金裕貞和蔡萬(wàn)植并沒(méi)有回避當(dāng)時(shí)的社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí),他們選擇了委婉的反諷手法,揭露了當(dāng)時(shí)窮乏的社會(huì)生活景象。由于兩人有著不同人生經(jīng)歷,他們作品中表現(xiàn)出來(lái)的反諷手法也有呈現(xiàn)出了不同。反諷,是一種帶有諷刺意味的修辭手法,單純從字面上不能了解其真正要表達(dá)的事物,而事實(shí)上其原本的意義正好是字面上所能理解的意涵的相反,通常要從上下文及語(yǔ)境來(lái)了解其用意。在研究修辭手法時(shí)應(yīng)與作品文本分析相結(jié)合。本文選擇了金裕貞和蔡萬(wàn)植具有代表性的短篇小說(shuō)作為基礎(chǔ)文本,通過(guò)作品中的人物以及他們對(duì)待現(xiàn)實(shí)的態(tài)度,分析兩位作家在反諷手法運(yùn)用及現(xiàn)實(shí)意識(shí)上的不同。本文將第2章分為三個(gè)部分。首先,從社會(huì)環(huán)境及作家生活經(jīng)歷兩個(gè)方面探究了兩位作家選擇反諷手法的原因。在日本帝國(guó)主義的高壓政策下,金裕貞和蔡萬(wàn)植面對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中的病痛與窮乏、不遇與不幸,反諷的表現(xiàn)手法是他們唯一的抵抗方式。其次,分別分析了金裕貞和蔡萬(wàn)植的作品。金裕貞將無(wú)知蠢笨的人作為小說(shuō)的主人公,講述了他們?cè)谪毨в植恍业默F(xiàn)實(shí)中悲慘的經(jīng)歷,引發(fā)了讀者的同情之心;蔡萬(wàn)植則通過(guò)殖民地社會(huì)中知識(shí)分子所經(jīng)歷的挫折,表達(dá)了自己對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)的否定態(tài)度。最后,總結(jié)了前一部分所分析的作品的異同點(diǎn),從而比較了金裕貞與蔡萬(wàn)植在韓國(guó)文學(xué)史意義上的不同。金裕貞作品中的人物主要是無(wú)知且愚鈍的“傻瓜”形象,他們面對(duì)不合理的現(xiàn)實(shí)沒(méi)有任何反抗,反而采取了更加消極的態(tài)度;而蔡萬(wàn)植作品中的人物大多是有一定知識(shí)的人,他們用自己的方式反抗著現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì),表現(xiàn)出好不妥協(xié)的一面。
[Abstract]:Kim Yu-jung and Tsai Wan-shih were important Korean novelists in the 1930 s. It is well known that in the 1930 s, Japan strengthened its colonial siege of South Korea. In this bleak society, Korean writers are looking for ways to save Korean literature in their own ways. As an important novelist in the 1930s, Kim Yu-jung and Tsai Wan-shih did not shy away from the social reality at that time. They chose euphemistic irony and exposed the poor social life scene at that time. Because of their different life experiences, the irony in their works is different. Irony is a rhetorical device with a sarcastic connotation that simply does not understand what it is intended to express, but in fact its original meaning is exactly the opposite of what is literally understood. It is usually understood in context and context. In the study of rhetorical devices, it should be combined with the text analysis of the works. This paper chooses Jin Yuzhen and Cai Wanzhi's representative short stories as the basic text. Through the characters in the works and their attitudes towards reality, this paper analyzes the differences in the use of irony and realistic consciousness between the two writers. Chapter 2 is divided into three parts. First of all, from the social environment and the writer's life experience, the author explores the reasons why the two writers choose irony. Under the high-pressure policy of Japanese imperialism, Jin Yuzhen and Cai Wanzhi face the illness and poverty in real life, not meet and unfortunate, irony is their only way of resistance. Secondly, it analyzes the works of Jin Yuzhen and Cai Wanzhi respectively. Jin Yuzhen takes the ignorant and stupid people as the protagonists of the novel, tells their tragic experiences in the poor and unfortunate reality, and arouses the sympathy of the readers, while Tsai Wan-shih experiences the setbacks experienced by the intellectuals in the colonial society. Expressed their negative attitude to the real society. Finally, the author summarizes the similarities and differences of the works analyzed in the previous part, and compares the significance of Kim Yu-jung and Tsai Wan-shih in Korean literary history. The characters in Jin Yuzhen's works are mainly ignorant and dull images of "fools." instead of any resistance to unreasonable reality, they take a more passive attitude, while most of the characters in Cai Wanzhi's works are people with certain knowledge. They use their own way to resist the real society, showing good intransigence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I312.607.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 高悅;;從主題方面談金裕貞小說(shuō)的諧謔性[J];黑龍江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

2 鄭明仲;;日帝下農(nóng)村崩壞樣相的小說(shuō)的受容——以金裕貞的農(nóng)村小說(shuō)為中心[J];徽學(xué);2011年00期

3 樸忠祿,南燕;金裕貞的小說(shuō)世界[J];當(dāng)代韓國(guó);2003年03期

4 舒坦;;作家聲音[J];文學(xué)教育(上);2008年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 高悅;金裕貞小說(shuō)的諧謔性研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2012年

2 金善花;金裕貞和莫言小說(shuō)的狂歡化特征比較研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2015年

3 劉鳴雁;金裕貞和蔡萬(wàn)植短篇小說(shuō)中反諷手法比較研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2017年

4 周蘋(píng);金裕貞小說(shuō)中的女性人物形象研究[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2005年

5 史方銳;金裕貞小說(shuō)女性人物的悲劇性研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

6 李曉婷;金裕貞和沈從文的小說(shuō)比較研究[D];山東大學(xué);2014年

7 朱思瑋;沈從文和金裕貞小說(shuō)比較研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1982320