本文選題：《最藍(lán)的眼睛》 + 焦慮��； 參考：《四川師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為當(dāng)代美國(guó)作家托尼·莫里森的杰作之一,《最藍(lán)的眼睛》描繪了布里德洛夫家庭的悲慘生活。主人公佩科拉生活在一個(gè)冷漠無(wú)情,缺乏關(guān)愛(ài)的家庭。同時(shí)她也在白人主導(dǎo)的社會(huì)和黑人社區(qū)受盡鄙視。佩科拉把一切不幸歸因于自己的黑人身份,因此她寄希望于擁有一雙藍(lán)色的眼睛去改變現(xiàn)狀,卻走上了精神錯(cuò)亂之路。在殘酷的社會(huì)環(huán)境下,佩科拉的父母也經(jīng)受過(guò)和她相似的痛苦。由此可見(jiàn),在白人意識(shí)形態(tài)的影響下,三位家庭成員都遭受著心理創(chuàng)傷。布里德洛夫一家作為美國(guó)黑人的縮影,他們受到的精神創(chuàng)傷是社會(huì)文化環(huán)境對(duì)黑人精神世界影響的反映。本文運(yùn)用心理學(xué)家卡倫·霍妮的神經(jīng)癥理論,分析造成佩科拉、喬利和波琳神經(jīng)癥人格的原因和神經(jīng)癥人格的表現(xiàn),揭示了充滿敵意和歧視的社會(huì)文化環(huán)境對(duì)黑人神經(jīng)癥人格的產(chǎn)生有著重要的影響。通過(guò)分析三位主要人物,作者指出他們都遭受著焦慮,即敵意世界里的一種孤立感和無(wú)助感。敵意的世界在文中表現(xiàn)為占主導(dǎo)地位的白人文化,社區(qū)的冷漠和家庭的殘酷等。為了減輕焦慮,他們形成了人際策略和內(nèi)心策略。在人際策略方面,佩科拉、喬利和波琳各自形成一種神經(jīng)癥趨勢(shì),即順從型類型,攻擊型類型和逃離型類型。在內(nèi)心策略方面,三位主要人物都疏離了自我,佩科拉和波琳沉迷于理想化意象,喬利采用了自我憎惡外化的方式。人際策略和內(nèi)心策略導(dǎo)致了僵化的行為反應(yīng)以及潛能與實(shí)現(xiàn)之間的脫節(jié)。上述分析表明,莫里森揭露了布里德洛夫家庭成員如何從內(nèi)外兩方面表現(xiàn)神經(jīng)癥人格,并失去了自我。本文通過(guò)揭示布里德洛夫家庭成員扭曲的心理和不正常的行為,強(qiáng)調(diào)了社會(huì)文化環(huán)境在塑造黑人健全的人格中的關(guān)鍵性作用。應(yīng)當(dāng)建立平等、民主、和諧的社會(huì)文化環(huán)境,幫助黑人形成健全的人格。因此霍妮視域下《最藍(lán)的眼睛》中神經(jīng)癥人格的解讀使其在神經(jīng)癥分析中具有實(shí)踐和理論意義。
[Abstract]:As one of the masterpieces of contemporary American writer Tony Morrison, the Bluest eyes portrays the tragic life of the Brid Love family. The protagonist Pecora lives in a cold, uncaring family. She was also despised in white-dominated societies and black communities. Pecora ascribed all her misfortunes to her black identity, so she set out on the path of insanity, hoping to have blue eyes to change the status quo. In the harsh social environment, Pekola's parents have experienced similar pain. Thus, under the influence of white ideology, all three family members suffered psychological trauma. As the epitome of the American blacks, the Brid's family suffered psychological trauma as a reflection of the influence of the social and cultural environment on the black spiritual world. Based on the neurotic theory of psychologist Karen Horney, this paper analyzes the causes of Pecora, Jolly and Pauline's neurotic personality and the manifestation of neurotic personality. It is revealed that the hostile and discriminatory social and cultural environment has an important influence on the formation of black neurotic personality. By analyzing the three main characters, the author points out that they all suffer from anxiety, that is, a sense of isolation and helplessness in a hostile world. The hostile world is characterized by dominant white culture, community apathy and family cruelty. To alleviate anxiety, they developed interpersonal and inner strategies. In interpersonal strategy, Pekola, Jolly and Pauline formed a neurotic trend, namely, compliance type, attack type and escape type. In terms of inner strategy, the three main characters are estranged. Pekora and Pauline are addicted to idealized images, and Jolly adopts the way of self-abomination. Interpersonal strategies and inner strategies lead to rigid behavioral responses and disconnect between potential and realization. The above analysis shows that Morrison reveals how Brid's family members exhibit neurotic personality in both internal and external ways and lose themselves. By revealing the distorted psychology and abnormal behavior of the members of the Brid Love family, this paper emphasizes the key role of social and cultural environment in shaping the sound personality of the black people. We should establish a social and cultural environment of equality, democracy and harmony to help black people form a sound personality. Therefore, the interpretation of neurotic personality in Hornie's Bluest Eye makes it practical and theoretical in neurosis analysis.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：I712.074

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周海林;;《紫色》和《最藍(lán)的眼睛》中黑人女性意識(shí)淺析[J];沈陽(yáng)教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

2 陸坤;;《最藍(lán)的眼睛》中文化霸權(quán)對(duì)他者的沖擊[J];山西廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

3 陳奕穎;;多元性的話語(yǔ)模式:從巴赫金小說(shuō)理論看《最藍(lán)的眼睛》[J];玉林師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

4 黃穎;;從《最藍(lán)的眼睛》看西方文化霸權(quán)對(duì)他者的沖擊[J];文學(xué)教育(上);2008年11期

5 張宏薇;;《最藍(lán)的眼睛》的文化透視[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2008年05期

6 喬雪瑛;;托妮·莫里森作品中家庭演變之女性主義透視[J];四川外語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

7 梁志健;;自然意象在《最藍(lán)的眼睛》中的象征意義[J];湖北教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

8 馬淑靜;;《最藍(lán)的眼睛》的審美召喚[J];甘肅聯(lián)合大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

9 胡慧芳;;《最藍(lán)的眼睛》中的文化霸權(quán)研究[J];五邑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

10 龍秀美;;獨(dú)特的結(jié)構(gòu)和敘述視角——析莫里森《最藍(lán)的眼睛》[J];華中師范大學(xué)研究生學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1893331