本文選題：中國(guó) + 馬克思主義�。� 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：中國(guó)的馬克思主義莎評(píng)在中國(guó)的莎士比亞研究中獨(dú)樹(shù)一幟,以茅盾、楊晦、趙澧、方平、楊周翰、卞之琳、孟憲強(qiáng)、孫家闞、張泗洋、王元化等十位先賢為代表,運(yùn)用馬克思主義的基本觀點(diǎn)和方法論闡釋莎士比亞的劇作,取得了卓越的成就。他們先后經(jīng)歷了從20世紀(jì)30年代至今80多年的歷程,其思想伴隨著政治風(fēng)云的變幻而變化。在最初的革命年代,學(xué)者們倡導(dǎo)革命文學(xué),追隨蘇聯(lián)的馬克思主義莎評(píng),形成了階級(jí)分析的模式,強(qiáng)調(diào)現(xiàn)實(shí)主義。"文革"前后,關(guān)注階級(jí)性、現(xiàn)實(shí)性和人民性,同時(shí)難免有"左"的傾向,把文學(xué)當(dāng)成工具,為政治服務(wù)。20世紀(jì)80年代以來(lái),逐漸淡化政治色彩,步入學(xué)理的境界,以馬克思主義美學(xué)的理念分析莎劇,從社會(huì)學(xué)批評(píng)轉(zhuǎn)向文藝學(xué)批評(píng)。
[Abstract]:The criticism of Marxism in China is unique in the study of Shakespeare in China. It is represented by Mao Dun, Yang Hui, Zhao Li, Fang Ping, Yang Zhouhan, Bian Zhilin, Meng Xianqiang, Sun Jia Kan, Zhang Siyang, Bian Zhilin, and other ten sages, including Mao Dun, Yang Hui, Zhao Li, Fang Ping, Yang Zhouhan, etc.Great achievements have been achieved in the interpretation of Shakespeare's plays in the light of Marxist basic viewpoints and methodology.They have experienced more than 80 years from 1930's to now, and their thoughts have changed with the change of political situation.In the early revolutionary era, scholars advocated revolutionary literature, followed the Soviet Union's Marxist criticism, and formed a class analysis model emphasizing realism. "Before and after the Cultural Revolution, attention was paid to the class nature, reality and people's character. At the same time, there was inevitably a tendency of "left". Literature was regarded as a tool to serve politics since the 1980s, gradually desalinating the political color and stepping into the realm of academic theory.To analyze Shakespeare's play with Marxist aesthetics, from sociological criticism to literary criticism.
【作者單位】： 上海大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I561.073

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 劉艷萍;大珠小珠落玉盤(pán)——評(píng)孟憲強(qiáng)《中國(guó)莎士比亞評(píng)論》[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)研究;1993年02期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1742349