本文關(guān)鍵詞： 內(nèi)藤湖南 《燕山楚水》 筆談　出處：《浙江工商大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：內(nèi)藤湖南作為憧憬中國傳統(tǒng)文化、對中國關(guān)注頗多的日本著名的中國學(xué)學(xué)者,其先后多次中國行為日本帶回了大量珍貴書籍、史料甚至情報信息等,同時也為后世留下了諸多的“旅行記”,這些紀(jì)行文不僅作為文學(xué)作品傳于世,其中包含了大量的史料信息,也為后世研究當(dāng)時的中日兩國的交往特別是其中文人知識分子的交往以及中日文化的交流提供了不可多得的資料。本文正文主要分為三個部分：第一章主要內(nèi)藤湖南生平及其首次中國行歸國后所寫紀(jì)行文《燕山楚水》的簡介,旨在厘清其首次中國行的游蹤脈絡(luò),梳理出《燕山楚水》第一部分“禹域鴻爪記”中的相關(guān)筆談文獻(xiàn)資料。第二章主要對《燕山楚水》中同內(nèi)藤湖南筆談的對象進(jìn)行分類介紹。從中可見與內(nèi)藤筆談的或是當(dāng)時的中上層知識分子或是當(dāng)時政界的要人,這與內(nèi)藤此次中國行的主要目的之一——探察中國時局密切相關(guān)。第三章主要就筆談內(nèi)容特別是原稿內(nèi)容進(jìn)行具體分析。通過比較分析內(nèi)藤文庫發(fā)現(xiàn)的筆談原稿這一第一手資料與博文館1900年版《燕山楚水》——內(nèi)藤歸國后不久變整理出版紀(jì)行文與中譯本的《燕山楚水》的異同,探知《燕山楚水》中關(guān)于筆談部分的記錄在多大程度上忠實于筆談原稿,其中的中譯本作為第三手資料是否能夠接近于著者的真實的意思表達(dá)及其與筆談原稿的差距。內(nèi)藤湖南作為京都學(xué)派的創(chuàng)始人之一,其提倡原典實證主義的治學(xué)方法可以說始終在影響和支配著他,在整理出版紀(jì)行文時也基本是對當(dāng)時情況的客觀描述,而對筆談部分的記述更是如此,基本保全了筆談的原貌,這一點也是后輩學(xué)者應(yīng)該學(xué)習(xí)并努力做到的。正是內(nèi)藤的這一精神才使得后世能夠在沒有親臨筆談現(xiàn)場的情況下能夠在史料的幫助下想象筆談的現(xiàn)場,不能不說是一份寶貴的財富。當(dāng)然,其中不乏內(nèi)藤主觀的感情的因素存在,使其在看待某些問題時站在民族本位的立場上發(fā)表看法。
[Abstract]:As a famous Japanese scholar of Chinese studies looking forward to Chinese traditional culture and paying much attention to China, Hunan Neito has successively brought back a large number of precious books, historical materials and even information information about China's behavior. At the same time, many "travel notes" have been left for later generations, which are not only handed down as literary works, but also contain a great deal of historical information. It also provides rare information for the later generations to study the exchanges between China and Japan, especially the communication between literati and intellectuals and the exchange of Chinese and Japanese culture. This text is divided into three parts: chapter one is mainly about Neito. A brief introduction to Hunan's life and the book "Yanshan Chushui" written after the return of China for the first time, To clarify the itinerary of his first trip to China, The first part of "Yuyu Hongclaw" is combed out the related literature and materials. The second chapter mainly introduces the objects of the "Yanshan Chushui" with Neito Hunan pen. From which we can see the pen talk with Neito. At that time, the upper-middle class intellectuals or the political figures of that time, This is closely related to one of the main purposes of Neito's trip to China-to explore the current situation in China. Chapter three mainly focuses on the specific analysis of the contents of the written remarks, especially the contents of the original manuscripts. A firsthand report and the 1900 edition of "Yanshan Chushui" by the Bowen Museum-soon after Neito returned to China, he changed and sorted out the similarities and differences between the published writings and the Chinese translation of "Yanshan Chushui". To find out the extent to which the record of the written part of "Yanshan Chushui" is faithful to the original manuscript, Whether the Chinese translation, as the third hand, can approach the author's true meaning expression and the gap between the Chinese version and the written manuscript. Neito Hunan, as one of the founders of the Kyoto School, His scholarly method of advocating positivism of the original code can be said to have always influenced and dominated him, and it is also basically an objective description of the situation at that time when sorting out the writing of the publication book, and this is especially true of the part of the written discourse, which basically preserves the original appearance of the written discourse. This is what later generations of scholars should learn and try to do. It is Nido's spirit that has enabled future generations to imagine pen talks without the help of historical data. Of course, there are many factors of Nito's subjective feelings, which make him express his views on the national standard when looking at some problems.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：I313.06

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 于智榮;;戰(zhàn)國時期“雎”字人名考釋[J];東北師大學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期

2 孟嬌;;私仆·公仆·公務(wù)員[J];吉林廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報;2008年01期

3 李建棟,陳希榮;魏收生年補(bǔ)證[J];開封大學(xué)學(xué)報;2003年01期

4 魯小俊;;也談生卒年的誤記原因和考證方法——以清代書院人物為中心[J];新世紀(jì)圖書館;2015年01期

5 陳仕國;;新見七種晚清民國傳奇雜劇考述[J];中華戲曲;2014年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 杜宏春;《游蜀疏稿》校補(bǔ)[D];中央民族大學(xué);2012年

2 張洪彬;天變，道亦變：晚清宇宙論之轉(zhuǎn)變[D];華東師范大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 龔瑩瑩;虞山派詩人馮班研究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2010年

2 于芳;明末遼東經(jīng)略文獻(xiàn)資料的文學(xué)特征研究[D];沈陽師范大學(xué);2011年

3 李建棟;魏收三論[D];西北大學(xué);2003年

4 張祺;清代學(xué)者對西方天文歷法的闡釋與發(fā)揮[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2006年

5 周艷桃;唐詩頭發(fā)描寫之文化研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2012年

6 于密思;吉林省四平地區(qū)歷史文化資源與校本課程開發(fā)[D];東北師范大學(xué);2013年

7 劉麗霞;楊以任與《讀史四集》校注[D];江西師范大學(xué);2013年

8 王寶剛;錢陳群詩歌研究[D];河北大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1554358