本文關(guān)鍵詞：《埃涅阿斯記》樂觀與悲觀之爭　出處：《史林》2016年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 維吉爾 奧古斯都 樂觀 悲觀 歐洲學(xué)派 哈佛學(xué)派

【摘要】：《埃涅阿斯記》樂觀與悲觀之爭堪稱20世紀(jì)"維吉爾學(xué)"兩大陣營的世紀(jì)之爭,即歐洲學(xué)派的傳統(tǒng)樂觀解讀,遭到美國哈佛學(xué)派的悲觀解構(gòu)。學(xué)者們圍繞維吉爾創(chuàng)作的目的乃頌奧古斯都震古鑠今之舉,或哀其功成骨枯之本進(jìn)行討論,進(jìn)而引發(fā)對《埃涅阿斯記》史詩或悲劇屬種,以及維吉爾是否奧古斯都政治上的擁躉等一系列問題的探討。筆者意對此二學(xué)派論點(diǎn)和方法進(jìn)行對比分析,以究二者聚訟之焦點(diǎn),并表達(dá)對歐洲學(xué)派的支持。
[Abstract]:The controversy between optimism and pessimism can be regarded as the century dispute between the two camps of Virgil Studies in 20th century, that is, the traditional optimistic interpretation of the European School. By the American Harvard school of pessimism deconstructed. Scholars around Virgil's purpose is to eulogize Augustus earthquake to the present, or to mourn its success to the root of the discussion. Then it leads to a series of questions about the epic or tragic genera and species of Aeneas and whether Virgil is a political supporter of Augustus. The author intends to make a comparative analysis of the arguments and methods of these two schools of thought. In order to investigate the focus of litigation between the two, and express their support for the European school.
【作者單位】： 愛爾蘭都柏林大學(xué)古典系;
【分類號】：K126;I106.2
【正文快照】： 《埃涅阿斯記》乃維吉爾為羅馬民族撰寫的炳炳p鷓，

本文編號：1420410