情態(tài)作為一個(gè)語(yǔ)法范疇,表達(dá)說話人對(duì)句子中命題的真值或事件的現(xiàn)實(shí)性狀態(tài)的主觀態(tài)度,包括一系列語(yǔ)義概念:可能性、必要性、能力、意愿、義務(wù)、許可等。在眾多表達(dá)情態(tài)的語(yǔ)言手段中,情態(tài)助動(dòng)詞是最主要的形式載體�，F(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)中,“知道”通常作為心理動(dòng)詞,即蘊(yùn)涵心理狀態(tài)的動(dòng)詞,表示“對(duì)于事物或道理有認(rèn)識(shí)”或“懂得”之義。在句法上,“知道”有兩種用法,一種是作為實(shí)義動(dòng)詞,帶體詞賓語(yǔ),即“知道+N”;一種是作為助動(dòng)詞,帶謂詞賓語(yǔ),即“知道+V”�，F(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)已經(jīng)對(duì)“知道”從多個(gè)角度進(jìn)行研究,包括語(yǔ)義特征、句法環(huán)境、“X知道”固定構(gòu)式等,盡管有涉及其主觀性、認(rèn)知模式、情態(tài)萌芽等方面的研究,但大多數(shù)尚未深入到“知道”的情態(tài)意義表達(dá)的研究。因此,本文采用Palmer(1990)提出的傳統(tǒng)情態(tài)類型三分法,即把情態(tài)類型分為認(rèn)識(shí)情態(tài)、動(dòng)力情態(tài)與道義情態(tài),旨在描述、分析和解讀“知道”作為現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)中典型心理動(dòng)詞可表達(dá)的不同情態(tài)意義。本文從北京語(yǔ)言大學(xué)語(yǔ)料庫(kù)(BCC)中隨機(jī)收集3000條語(yǔ)料(使用“知道”作為謂語(yǔ)的句子)來構(gòu)成本研究所需的語(yǔ)料庫(kù),通過定性與定量相結(jié)合的研究方法進(jìn)行細(xì)致觀察和分析,試圖回答三個(gè)問題:(1)“知道”可以...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：105 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Research Objectives and Questions
    1.3 Data Collection and Analysis
    1.4 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
    2.1 Previous Studies on Chinese Psychological Verbs
        2.1.1 Definitions and Classifications of Psychological Verbs
        2.1.2 Discussions on Subjectivity and Modalization of Psychological Verbs
        2.1.3 Semantic and Grammatical Similarities between Psychological Verbsand Modal Auxiliaries
    2.2 Previous Studies on Chinese Psych Verb "Zhidao"
        2.2.1 An Overview of Traditional Study of "Zhidao"
        2.2.2 Previous Studies of Factivity and Subjectivity of "Zhidao"
        2.2.3 Previous Studies of Epistemic Logic and Modality of "Zhidao"
        2.2.4 Discussions on Grammaticalization and Modalization of "Zhidao" Typeof Verbs
    2.3 Summary
Chapter 3 Theoretical Foundation
    3.1 Modality
        3.1.1 An Overview of Definitions of Modality
        3.1.2 An Overview of Classifications of Modality
        3.1.3 Three-fold Distinction of Modality
        3.1.4 Linguistic Means of Expressing Modality in Mandarin Chinese
    3.2 Modal Auxiliary Verbs
        3.2.1 Definitions of Auxiliary Verbs
        3.2.2 Classification Standards of(Modal)Auxiliary Verbs
        3.2.3 Syntactic Behaviors of(Modal)Auxiliary Verbs
    3.3 Summary
Chapter 4 Analysis of Modal Meanings and Syntactic Behaviors of "Zhidao"
    4.1 Polysemy and Syntactic Representation of "Zhidao"
    4.2 Dynamic Modality Expressed by "Zhidao"
        4.2.1 Ability Sense in Participant-inherent Dynamic Modality
        4.2.2 Willingness Sense in Participant-inherent Dynamic Modality
        4.2.3 Ability or Willingness Sense in Participant-imposed Dynamic Modality
    4.3 Deontic Modality Expressed by "Zhidao"
        4.3.1 Obligative Sense in Deontic Modality
        4.3.2 Commissive Promises in Deontic Modality
    4.4 Epistemic Modality Expressed by "Zhidao"
        4.4.1 Deductive Epistemic Modality
        4.4.2 Assumptive Epistemic Modality
    4.5 A Discussion on Syntactic Behaviors of "Zhidao"
        4.5.1 Syntactic Constituents
        4.5.2 A Discussion Under the Classification Standards of Auxiliary Verbs
        4.5.3 A Discussion Under Syntactic Distribution Standards of Auxiliary Verbs
    4.6 Summary
Chapter 5 Pragmatic Functions of "Zhidao"
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Pragmatic Functions of Praise and Appreciation
        5.2.1 "Zhidao" Modified by "Ye" (Also)or "Lian.Ye" (Even)
        5.2.2 "Zhidao" Negated and Modified by "Cong" or "Conglai" (Never)
    5.3 Pragmatic Functions of Blaming and Criticism
        5.3.1 "Zhidao" Modified by "Ye" (Also)
        5.3.2 "Zhidao" Modified by "Zhi/Cai/Jiu" (Only)
        5.3.3 "Zhidao" Negated and Modified by "Cong" or "Conglai" (Never)
        5.3.4 "Zhidao" Negated and Modified by "Yidianye" (Not at all)
    5.4 Summary
Chapter 6 Conclusion
    6.1 Major Findings of the Study
    6.2 Implications of the Study
    6.3 Limitations and Prospects for Further Research
References



本文編號(hào)：4005544