言語行為一直是語用學(xué)研究的重點。自Searle于1975年提出了間接言語行為的概念,這一研究對象又受到了廣泛關(guān)注。傳統(tǒng)的語用學(xué)理論例如合作原則和禮貌原則在闡釋間接言語行為方面取得了很大的成就,具有較為廣泛的影響力。 隨著認(rèn)知語言學(xué)的發(fā)展,人們發(fā)現(xiàn)單從語用的角度來研究言語行為無法對常見的語言現(xiàn)象做出全面的解釋,尤其是理解間接請求言語行為時的迅速性及自然性并沒有給出令人信服的解釋。Thornburg & Panther在1997年將言語行為轉(zhuǎn)喻和行為腳本結(jié)合提出了言語行為腳本理論證明了間接言語行為轉(zhuǎn)喻的本質(zhì)。國內(nèi)的李勇忠針對他們的言語行為轉(zhuǎn)喻理性地批判,并加入了一些語用要素,完善了言語行為腳本理論;王寅教授也針對言語行為腳本理論的線性闡釋提出了事件域認(rèn)知模型(ECM)加以闡釋,兼顧了線性和層級分析,適用于動態(tài)和靜態(tài)場景;周啟強和白解紅則從范疇理論對間接指令做出了分析,指出各種間接指令構(gòu)成的是一個邊界模糊的原型范疇,其內(nèi)部成員具有不同的原型等級。 選題以Fauconnier于1997年出版專著中提出的概念整合理論為理論支撐,輔以概念轉(zhuǎn)喻的特點和語用功能,并結(jié)合一些經(jīng)典間接請求言語行為...

【文章頁數(shù)】：55 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
1 Introduction
    1.1 Significance of the Study
    1.2 Purpose of the Study
    1.3 Overall Structure of the Thesis
2 Literature Review
    2.1 Research Situation Abroad
        2.1.1 Review of the Topic
        2.1.2 Studies within Pragmatics
        2.1.3 Studies within Cognitive Linguistics
    2.2 Research Situation at Home
        2.2.1 Supplementary Study of Speech Act Metonymy
        2.2.2 Wang’s Event-domain Cognitive Model
        2.2.3 Categorization Approach to Indirect directives
    2.3 Weakness of Previous Studies
3 Theoretical Basis
    3.1 Conceptual Metonymy
        3.1.1 Cognitive Perspective of Metonymy
        3.1.2 Pragmatic Functions of Metonymy
        3.1.3 Pragmatic Types of Metonymy
    3.2 Conceptual Blending Theory
        3.2.1 Mental Spaces
        3.2.2 Basics of Conceptual Blending Theory
        3.2.3 Emergent Structure and Emergent Meaning
        3.2.4 Optimality Principles of Conceptual Blending Theory
        3.2.5 Meaning Construction in Blending Network
    3.3 Interaction of Conceptual Metonymy and Blending Theory
        3.3.1 Similarities in Thinking and Networks
        3.3.2 Metonymic Mapping and Cross-space Mapping
        3.3.3 Metonymy and Optimality Principles
        3.3.4 Role of Metonymy in Conceptual Blending Theory
4 Metonymic Analysis of Indirect Request Speech Acts
    4.1 Notion of Request
    4.2 Direct Request and Indirect Request
        4.2.1 Criterion of Sentence Structure
        4.2.2 Criterion of Illocutionary Act
        4.2.3 Criterion of Cooperative Principle
        4.2.4 Criterion of Strategy Types
    4.3 Metonymic Interpretation of Indirect Requests
        4.3.1 Pragmatic Attributes of Indirect Requests
        4.3.2 Metonymic Attributes of Indirect Requests
        4.3.3 Methodology
        4.3.4 Cases Studies
5 Conclusion
    5.1 Summary and Contributions
    5.2 Limitations
    5.3 Further Suggestions
References
Acknowledgement



本文編號：3986006