發(fā)布時(shí)間：2023-11-25 01:49

　　隨著社會的發(fā)展,民主和文明已成為世界各國人民的共同追求。因此,政治家們往往需要借助公開演講來激發(fā)民眾熱情、獲取聽眾支持,以達(dá)到其宣傳、教育、鼓動或交流的政治目的。然而,政治語言往往十分枯燥和抽象。為了能夠更好地被聽眾所理解和接受,政治家們通常要用一些簡單生動的語言來表達(dá)那些抽象的政治概念。這時(shí),有著極佳煽動性和闡釋性的隱喻就成了他們的最佳選擇。 從最初將其看作是一種單純的修辭手段,到現(xiàn)在認(rèn)為它是人類概念系統(tǒng)的反映,各國學(xué)者們對隱喻的研究已有兩千多年的歷史。特別是最近幾十年,越來越多的語言學(xué)家開始關(guān)注政治語言中的隱喻研究。然而,針對政治演講中概念隱喻的對比研究卻很少有人涉及。 本研究所用語料選自中國國家主席江澤民、胡錦濤以及美國總統(tǒng)克林頓、奧巴馬在出國訪問期間對大學(xué)生所做的演講,其中中方語料為14073字,美方語料為11696詞。本研究以Lakoff的概念隱喻理論為基礎(chǔ),采用Charteris-Black (2004)提出的批評隱喻分析方法,分三步——隱喻識別、隱喻闡釋和隱喻說明——對中美兩方語料中的概念隱喻進(jìn)行對比分析。定量分析和定性分析在研究過程中均有所應(yīng)用。 研究表明,概念隱喻在中...

【文章頁數(shù)】：65 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgement
Abstract (Chinese)
Abstract (English)
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Research
    1.2 Goals of the Research
    1.3 Significance of the Research
    1.4 Data and Methodology
    1.5 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
    2.1 Traditional Metaphor Research
    2.2 Contemporary Metaphor Research
    2.3 Conceptual Metaphor Theory
        2.3.1 Features of Conceptual Metaphor
        2.3.2 Working Mechanism of Conceptual Metaphor
    2.4 Review on Metaphor Studies of Political Discourses
    2.5 Review on Critical Discourse Analysis of Political Discourses
Chapter 3 Analytical Framework and Research Methodology
    3.1 Analytical Framework
        3.1.1 Introduction to CMA
        3.1.2 Process of CMA
    3.2 Research Methodology
        3.2.1 Data Collection
        3.2.2 Data Analysis Procedures
Chapter 4 Data Analysis
    4.1 Dominant Conceptual Metaphors in the Chinese Corpus
        4.1.1 Journey Metaphors
        4.1.2 Building Metaphors
        4.1.3 War Metaphors
        4.1.4 Family Metaphors
        4.1.5 Plant Metaphors
    4.2 Dominant Conceptual Metaphors in the American Copus
        4.2.1 Journey Metaphors
        4.2.2 War Metaphors
        4.2.3 Building Metaphors
        4.2.4 Religion Metaphors
        4.2.5 Plant Metaphors
Chapter 5 Contrastive Analysis
    5.1 Summary of the Conceptual Metaphors Used in the Data
    5.2 Same Conceptual Metaphors Used in Both Corpora
    5.3 Differences between Similar Conceptual Metaphors Used in the Chinese and American Corpora
    5.4 Conceptual Metaphors Unique to Each Corpus
    5.5 Social Basis of Conceptual Metaphors in the Data
Chapter 6 Conclusion
    6.1 Major Findings of the Study
    6.2 Implications of the Study
    6.3 Limitations of the Study and Suggestions for Future Research
Bibliography



本文編號：3867030