量詞與復(fù)數(shù)標(biāo)記
發(fā)布時間：2023-11-04 12:57
本文主要研究與量詞和名詞復(fù)數(shù)標(biāo)記相關(guān)的兩個問題：(1)量詞性語言中的名詞是否有可數(shù)不可數(shù)之分；(2)量詞與復(fù)數(shù)標(biāo)記能否共現(xiàn)。 首先,對于量詞性語言中的名詞是否有可數(shù)與不可數(shù)之分,Chierchia(1998)認為量詞性語言中的所有名詞均為物質(zhì)名詞；而Cheng&Sybesma(1999)認為漢語中的名詞有可數(shù)物質(zhì)名詞(count-mass noun)和不可數(shù)物質(zhì)名詞(mass-mass noun)的區(qū)分。我們同意Cheng&Sybesma(1999)的觀點,并進一步指出：量詞性語言和非量詞性語言之間,名詞本質(zhì)不存在根本區(qū)別。量詞性語言中名詞也有可數(shù)不可數(shù)之分,只是可數(shù)與不可數(shù)的標(biāo)記形式不一樣。非量詞性語言如英語中,可數(shù)與不可數(shù)標(biāo)記體現(xiàn)在名詞上,而量詞性語言如漢語中,可數(shù)與不可數(shù)標(biāo)記體現(xiàn)在量詞上。 其次,對于量詞與復(fù)數(shù)標(biāo)記共現(xiàn)的現(xiàn)象,以往研究認為量詞與復(fù)數(shù)標(biāo)記是呈互補分布的。本文對此觀點提出了質(zhì)疑。我們發(fā)現(xiàn),在漢語、日語和韓語這三種語言中,既有量詞系統(tǒng),又存在復(fù)數(shù)標(biāo)記,并且復(fù)數(shù)標(biāo)記與量詞可以共現(xiàn)�；谝陨嫌^察,本文提出三個相關(guān)問題：(1)為什么三種語言中“名+復(fù)+(格)+...
【文章頁數(shù)】：69 頁
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Research Questions and Proposals
1.3 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Chierchia's (1998) Proposal
2.3 Problems with Chierchia's Analysis
2.4 Cheng and Sybesma's (1999) Argument
2.5 Potential Problems with Cheng and Sybesma's Analysis
2.6 Borer's (2005) Proposal
2.7 Potential Problems with Borer's Analysis
2.8 Muromatsu's (2003) Claim
2.9 Summary
Chapter 3 A Unified Account of the Count/Mass Distinction among Languages
3.1 Introduction
3.2 UG and Parameter Setting
3.3 Count/Mass nouns in CLs
3.3.1 Distinctions between Classifiers and Massifiers
3.3.2 The Nature of Nouns in CLs
3.4 Parametric Differences among Languages
3.4.1 Equating Classifier with Plural Marker
3.4.2 Mass Noun Hypothesis in CLs and NLs
3.5 Summary
Chapter 4 Co-occurrence of Classifiers and Plural Markers
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Classifier and Plural Marker
4.3 Plural Markers in CLs
4.4 Data Description and Questions under Investigation
4.4.1 Mandarin
4.4.2 Japanese
4.4.3 Korean
4.4.4 Summary
4.5 Classifier and Plural Marker
4.6 Answers to the Three Questions
4.7 Summary
Conclusion
References
Appendix A 詳細中文摘要
Acknowledgements
本文編號：3860350
【文章頁數(shù)】：69 頁
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Research Questions and Proposals
1.3 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Chierchia's (1998) Proposal
2.3 Problems with Chierchia's Analysis
2.4 Cheng and Sybesma's (1999) Argument
2.5 Potential Problems with Cheng and Sybesma's Analysis
2.6 Borer's (2005) Proposal
2.7 Potential Problems with Borer's Analysis
2.8 Muromatsu's (2003) Claim
2.9 Summary
Chapter 3 A Unified Account of the Count/Mass Distinction among Languages
3.1 Introduction
3.2 UG and Parameter Setting
3.3 Count/Mass nouns in CLs
3.3.1 Distinctions between Classifiers and Massifiers
3.3.2 The Nature of Nouns in CLs
3.4 Parametric Differences among Languages
3.4.1 Equating Classifier with Plural Marker
3.4.2 Mass Noun Hypothesis in CLs and NLs
3.5 Summary
Chapter 4 Co-occurrence of Classifiers and Plural Markers
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Classifier and Plural Marker
4.3 Plural Markers in CLs
4.4 Data Description and Questions under Investigation
4.4.1 Mandarin
4.4.2 Japanese
4.4.3 Korean
4.4.4 Summary
4.5 Classifier and Plural Marker
4.6 Answers to the Three Questions
4.7 Summary
Conclusion
References
Appendix A 詳細中文摘要
Acknowledgements
本文編號：3860350
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/3860350.html
