隱喻作為語言中的一個(gè)普遍現(xiàn)象,自亞里士多德起就被廣泛研究。在傳統(tǒng)的理論中,隱喻大多被看作是一種修辭手段。二十世紀(jì)八十年代,George Lakoff & Mark Johnson在Metaphors We Live By(《我們賴以生存的隱喻》)一書中提出概念隱喻理論。認(rèn)知觀的隱喻研究全面開始。許多學(xué)者在眾多領(lǐng)域展開對(duì)概念隱喻的研究。其中,經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域引起學(xué)者的關(guān)注。新聞作者常使用恰當(dāng)?shù)碾[喻來對(duì)其進(jìn)行形象的描述。隱喻在經(jīng)濟(jì)語篇中無處不在,具有重要的地位。本研究旨在對(duì)比分析中美經(jīng)濟(jì)新聞中概念隱喻的相同和不同之處,以此來加深不同文化模式下概念隱喻的研究。 本文研究的新聞?wù)Z料取自2010年10月到11月期間發(fā)行的美國(guó)報(bào)紙《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》(自世界各國(guó)報(bào)紙全文庫(kù)獲取)和中文報(bào)紙《經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào)》(自經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào)多媒體數(shù)字報(bào)刊獲取)。中英文經(jīng)濟(jì)新聞報(bào)道各50篇,選取201條中英文隱喻表達(dá)式。筆者依據(jù)概念隱喻的基本理論,對(duì)語料采用定性的研究方法,將其分類,并依照其源域歸納為8類：戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)、旅途、人類、上/下、水流、天氣、非人類物體和容器。通過對(duì)其中四種主要概念隱喻(戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)、旅途、人類、上/下)的定性分析,并依據(jù)La...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：60 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Introduction
Chapter One Literature Review
    1.1 Traditional Theories of Metaphor
        1.1.1 Comparison Theory
        1.1.2 Substitution Theory
        1.1.3 Interaction Theory
    1.2 Previous Researches into Economic News Reports
        1.2.1 Definition of Economic News Reports
        1.2.2 Previous Research into Economic News Reports
    1.3 Previous Researches into Metaphors in Economic News Reports
    1.4 Summary
Chapter Two Conceptual Metaphor Theory
    2.1 Cognitive Theories of Metaphor
    2.2 The Working Mechanism of Metaphor
    2.3 The Classification of Conceptual Metaphor
        2.3.1 Structural Metaphors
        2.3.2 Ontological Metaphors
        2.3.3 Orientational Metaphors
    2.4 The Cognitive Functions of Metaphor
    2.5 Idealized Cognitive Models
    2.6 Summary
Chapter Three Comparative Analysis of Conceptual Metaphors inChinese and American Economic News Reports
    3.1 Introduction
        3.1.1 Criteria for Identifying Metaphor
        3.1.2 Data Collection and Research Methodology
        3.1.3 General Data Analysis
    3.2 Comparative Analysis of Conceptual Metaphors in Chinese and American Economic News Reports
        3.2.1 Structural Metaphors
        3.2.2 Ontological Metaphors
        3.2.3 Orientational Metaphors
    3.3 Similarities and Differences between Chinese and English on Conceptual Metaphors
    3.4 Summary
Conclusion
Bibliography
Acknowledgments



本文編號(hào)：3834518