稱(chēng)謂在現(xiàn)如今的言語(yǔ)交流中是重要的組成部分,起著舉足輕重的地位,漢語(yǔ)稱(chēng)謂系統(tǒng)是一個(gè)比較復(fù)雜的系統(tǒng),它的涵蓋面也十分廣,大體上包括姓名稱(chēng)謂語(yǔ),親屬稱(chēng)謂語(yǔ),職位稱(chēng)謂以及社會(huì)稱(chēng)謂語(yǔ)。而社會(huì)稱(chēng)謂語(yǔ)按照使用的范圍又可分為通稱(chēng),專(zhuān)稱(chēng),以及零稱(chēng)謂。本文主要針對(duì)在日常交際中使用的通用稱(chēng)謂語(yǔ)為研究對(duì)象,選擇了兩個(gè)傳承的通稱(chēng):“師傅”和“同志”;二個(gè)新興的稱(chēng)謂:“老師”,“老板”;三個(gè)重新啟用而來(lái)的稱(chēng)謂:“大姐”,“先生”,“小姐”;還有二個(gè)泛化而來(lái)的稱(chēng)謂:“美女”,“帥哥”。通稱(chēng)的使用一方面是可以體現(xiàn)社會(huì)地位,另一方面也可以拉近人與人之間的距離。本文作者試圖用認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)中的原型理論來(lái)分析語(yǔ)義裂變現(xiàn)象。現(xiàn)如今,認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)已成為一個(gè)流行的趨勢(shì),它是語(yǔ)言的一個(gè)新主題。原型理論是認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)中的基本理論,所以用原型理論來(lái)闡釋這個(gè)現(xiàn)象能使其上升到演變機(jī)制的高度,從而使本文更具理論性和科學(xué)性。根據(jù)如上考慮,本文主要有以下三個(gè)研究問(wèn)題:1,什么是語(yǔ)義裂變現(xiàn)象及產(chǎn)生語(yǔ)義裂變現(xiàn)象的原因?2,在語(yǔ)義裂變過(guò)程中,每一個(gè)通稱(chēng)的基本意義有變化嗎?如果有,它們是怎么變化的? 3,當(dāng)通稱(chēng)發(fā)生語(yǔ)義裂變時(shí)的過(guò)程是什么?為了使以上問(wèn)題更加清晰... 

【文章來(lái)源】：東北師范大學(xué)吉林省211工程院校教育部直屬院校

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：56 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Significance of the Study
    1.2 Reasons for the Study
    1.3 Organization of the Study
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Prototype Theory
        2.1.1 Classical View of Category
        2.1.2 Defining Prototypes
        2.1.3 Characteristics of Prototypicality
    2.2 Studies on Semantic Fission
        2.2.1 Definition of Semantic Fission
        2.2.2 Steps of Semantic Fission
    2.3 Studies on Chinese Widely-used Address Forms
        2.3.1 Definition of “Widely-used”
        2.3.2 Characteristics of Chinese Widely-used Adress Forms
        2.3.3 Factors that are involved in the Selection of Widely-used Address Forms .
    2.4 Studies on Semantic Fission of Chinese Widely-used Address Forms
Chapter Three Research Design
    3.1 Research Object
    3.2 Research Questions
    3.3 Research Participants
    3.4 Research Methods
    3.5 Data Collection
    3.6 Research Procedure
Chapter Four Results and Discussion
    4.1 Results of Question One
        4.1.1 the First Result
        4.1.2 the Second Result
    4.2 Results and Discussion of Questionnaire
        4.2.1 Results of Questionnaire
        4.2.2 Discussion
    4.3 Results of Question Three
        4.3.1 “Tongzhi”
        4.3.2 “Shifu”
        4.3.3 “Laoshi”
        4.3.4 “Laoban”
        4.3.5 “Xiaojie”
        4.3.6 “Xiansheng”
        4.3.7 “Meinv”and “Shuaige”
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Implication
    5.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Studies
        5.3.1 Limitations of Prototype Theory
        5.3.2 Limitations of Widely-used Address Forms
        5.3.3 Future Studies
References
AppendixⅠ
Acknowledgements



本文編號(hào)：3632492