目前中國的立法現(xiàn)狀及法庭參與者的地位,基本是通過法庭審判體現(xiàn)的,而法庭會話作為法庭審判的主要載體,應(yīng)當(dāng)受到更多的關(guān)注和研究。然而目前在國內(nèi),注重這一方面研究的學(xué)者并不多見,比較有成就的是廖美珍教授,但其研究成果多為對問話行為的分布進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì)分析。那么如果以上下文語境以及認(rèn)知語境的角度研究,是否會有不同的結(jié)論呢?帶著這些疑問,本文作者展開了下面的研究。本文研究的目的在于結(jié)合語境理論,著重從語言學(xué)的角度分析中國法庭審判,研究和發(fā)現(xiàn)法庭對話體現(xiàn)的參與者的作用和地位、以及訴訟策略等,旨在指出中國法庭審判中存在的一些問題、提出建議,并促進(jìn)語言學(xué)家和法律專家的合作以改善目前的法庭回話語言狀況�？v觀語境理論的發(fā)展歷程,主要分類兩個(gè)階段,靜態(tài)語境和認(rèn)知語境研究階段。所以本文首先用靜態(tài)語境的相關(guān)理論來分析法庭會話,具體內(nèi)容包括國內(nèi)外關(guān)于靜態(tài)語境研究的理論和用靜態(tài)語境理論來分析法庭會話,并且通過比較用靜態(tài)語境理論分析的優(yōu)劣而得出結(jié)論。接下來是從認(rèn)知語境的角度分析法庭會話。鑒于認(rèn)知語境的特點(diǎn),有必要確定一個(gè)范圍進(jìn)行研究和分析,通過研究發(fā)現(xiàn)利用認(rèn)知語境模型分析比較可行。本章由認(rèn)知語境的相關(guān)理論引出模型的內(nèi)容... 

【文章來源】：西南政法大學(xué)重慶市

【文章頁數(shù)】：66 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
List of Figures
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Rationale of the study
        1.1.1 The importance of courtroom discourse
        1.1.2 A need for study of courtroom discourse
        1.1.3 An urgent need for analysis of the courtroom discourse in the perspective of context
    1.2 Purpose of the study
    1.3 Research methodology and data collection
    1.4 Organization of the thesis
CHAPTER TWO OVERVIEW OF THE RESEARCH ON COURTROOM DISCOURSE
    2.1 Studies on courtroom discourse
        2.1.1 Definition of discourse
        2.1.2 Definition of courtroom discourse
        2.1.3 Classifications of courtroom trial
        2.1.4 Studies on courtroom discourse analysis
            2.1.4.1 Studies on courtroom discourse analysis abroad
            2.1.4.2 Studies on courtroom discourse analysis at home
    2.2 Limitations of previous courtroom discourse studies in linguistic field
    2.3 Summary
CHAPTER THREE COURTROOM DISCOURSE ANALYSIS IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF STATIC CONTEXT
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Overview of research on static studies of context abroad
    3.3 Overview of research on static studies of context at home
        3.3.1 Achievements of static context in ancient China
        3.3.2 Achievements of static context in modern China
            3.3.2.1 Definitions of static context in modern China
            3.3.2.2 Classifications on static context in modern China
    3.4 Limitations of static studies of context
    3.5 Courtroom discourse analysis in the perspective of static studies
        3.5.1 Courtroom discourse analysis in the perspective of static studies
        3.5.2 Limitations of static studies in courtroom discourse analysis
    3.6 Summary
CHAPTER FOUR COURTROOM DISCOURSE ANALYSIS IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF COGNITIVE CONTEXT
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Cognitive context
        4.2.1 The notion of cognitive context
        4.2.2 Nature of cognitive context
        4.2.3 Function of mutual manifestness of cognitive context
    4.3 Cognitive context models
        4.3.1 Introduction
        4.3.2 Mental models
        4.3.3 Cognitive context models
    4.4 Courtroom trial analysis in the perspective of cognitive context
        4.4.1 Macro analysis of the courtroom discussion fragment
            4.4.1.1 Analysis in terms of features of the event
            4.4.1.2 Analysis in terms of relationship between participants
            4.4.1.3 Analysis in terms of form of the event
        4.4.2 Micro-analysis of the courtroom discussion fragment
            4.4.2.1 Identity analysis of categories of cognitive context models
            4.4.2.2 Position and goals analysis of categories of cognitive context models
            4.4.2.3 Lexical level analysis
            4.4.2.4 Expressing strategy analysis
            4.4.2.5 Semantic level analysis
    4.5 Findings and suggestions of the analysis
        4.5.1 Findings of analysis
        4.5.2 Suggestions to Chinese court
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION
    5.1 Major conclusions
    5.2 Contributions
    5.3 Limitations of the current research and recommendations for further study
Bibliography


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]中國法庭互動話語formulation現(xiàn)象研究[J]. 廖美珍.  外語研究. 2006(02)
[2]目的原則與法庭互動話語合作問題研究[J]. 廖美珍.  外語學(xué)刊. 2004(05)
[3]中國法庭互動話語對應(yīng)結(jié)構(gòu)研究[J]. 廖美珍.  語言科學(xué). 2003(05)
[4]從問答行為看中國法庭審判現(xiàn)狀[J]. 廖美珍.  語言文字應(yīng)用. 2002(04)
[5]翻譯過程模式論斷想[J]. 肖輝,張柏然.  外語與外語教學(xué). 2001(11)
[6]語境的動態(tài)研究[J]. 何兆熊,蔣艷梅.  外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 1997(06)
[7]語用學(xué)和認(rèn)知語境[J]. 熊學(xué)亮.  外語學(xué)刊(黑龍江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 1996(03)
[8]語用、意義和語境[J]. 何兆熊.  外國語(上海外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)). 1987(05)



本文編號：3620187