之前學(xué)界一般認(rèn)為,特殊型語言障礙（SLI）兒童主要是語法問題,而高功能自閉癥（HFA）兒童主要是語用問題。然而,近期研究發(fā)現(xiàn)這兩類障礙兒童都存在句法和語用方面的缺陷,使兩類兒童誤診率增加。如何利用語言學(xué)手段區(qū)分這兩類兒童已成為國際學(xué)界的研究熱點。國外學(xué)者通過對比兩類障礙兒童的語言表現(xiàn),為區(qū)別這兩類兒童做出了貢獻。但國內(nèi)此類對比研究還不多見。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),英語SLI兒童在雙及物結(jié)構(gòu)的理解和產(chǎn)出上都存在問題,但HFA兒童在此結(jié)構(gòu)的表現(xiàn)仍不太清晰,目前還沒有漢語這兩類障礙兒童的相關(guān)研究。因此,本研究旨在探究漢語SLI兒童和HFA兒童在雙及物結(jié)構(gòu)上的異同,嘗試為區(qū)分這兩類兒童提供依據(jù)。三組年齡匹配的漢語兒童參加了本次研究,包括17名HFA兒童,18名SLI兒童和27名正常兒童。通過啟動產(chǎn)出和圖片匹配兩個任務(wù)來考察三組兒童對于雙及物結(jié)構(gòu)的理解和產(chǎn)出情況并比較他們在四種雙及物結(jié)構(gòu)式的表現(xiàn)。結(jié)果顯示,HFA兒童和SLI兒童存在以下兩個相似之處:（1）他們在兩個任務(wù)中都顯著差于正常兒童;（2）產(chǎn)出上都受加工復(fù)雜度的影響:（a）傾向產(chǎn)出雙賓語結(jié)構(gòu)而不是與格結(jié)構(gòu),（b）多產(chǎn)出Subject+V+NP1+NP2... 

【文章來源】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)廣東省

【文章頁數(shù)】：101 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ABSTRACT
摘要
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Research background
    1.2 Research questions
    1.3 Significance of the research
    1.4 The organization of the thesis
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 Ontological studies on ditransitive constructions
        2.1.1 The structures of ditransitive constructions
        2.1.2 Verbs in ditransitive constructions
        2.1.3 The definiteness and indefiniteness of the two objects
    2.2 Acquisition of the ditransitive construction by TDA children
        2.2.1 Studies in children speaking foreign languages
        2.2.2 Studies in Mandarin-speaking children
    2.3 Acquisition of ditransitive constructions by SLI children
        2.3.1 Studies in children speaking foreign languages
        2.3.2 Studies in Mandarin-speaking children
    2.4 Acquisition of the ditransitive construction by HFA children
    2.5 Derivational Complexity Hypothesis
    2.6 Summary
CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY
    3.1 Participants
        3.1.1 The SLI group
        3.1.2 The HFA group
        3.1.3 The TDA group
    3.2 Experiment designs
        3.2.1 Production task
        3.2.2 Comprehension task
    3.3 Procedures
    3.4 Scoring criteria and data analysis
    3.5 Summary
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS
    4.1 Production task
        4.1.1 Between-group comparison
        4.1.2 Within-group comparison
        4.1.3 Analysis of non-target responses
    4.2 Comprehension task
        4.2.1 Between-group comparison
        4.2.2 Within-group comparison
        4.2.3 Error analysis
    4.3 Summary
CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION
    5.1 Discussion on the similarities between children with HFA and children with SLI
        5.1.1 Similarities in the production task
        5.1.2 Similarities in the comprehension task
    5.2 Discussion on the differences between children with HFA and children with SLI
        5.2.1 Differences in the production task
        5.2.2 Differences in the comprehension task
    5.3 Summary
CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION
    6.1 Summary of the study
    6.2 Contributions of this study
    6.3 Limitations and suggestions for future studies
REFERENCES
APPENDICES
    Appendix A
    Appendix B


【參考文獻】：
期刊論文
[1]普通話早期兒童“給”字句習(xí)得個案研究[J]. 鄒立志.  世界漢語教學(xué). 2012(04)
[2]合并順序與英漢雙及物結(jié)構(gòu)對比研究[J]. 何曉煒.  外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報). 2008(02)
[3]雙賓語結(jié)構(gòu)和與格結(jié)構(gòu)的關(guān)系分析[J]. 何曉煒.  外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報). 2003(02)
[4]1—5歲兒童使用雙賓結(jié)構(gòu)狀況的考察[J]. 周國光.  心理科學(xué). 1997(02)



本文編號：3037696