【摘要】：本文通過一項教學(xué)實驗考察兩種不同的形式教學(xué)法,即:意義優(yōu)先、聚焦形式教學(xué)法(Focus on Form,簡稱FonF)和全形式教學(xué)法(Focus on Forms,簡稱FonFs)對漢語二語詞匯學(xué)習(xí)的影響。意義優(yōu)先、聚焦形式教學(xué)法在完成閱讀理解任務(wù)的過程中學(xué)習(xí)生詞,而全形式教學(xué)法則采用傳統(tǒng)的詞匯表方式學(xué)習(xí)生詞。實驗從五個維度測量了兩種教學(xué)法對漢語二語詞匯學(xué)習(xí)的影響,結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn):整體而言,全形式教學(xué)法對漢語二語學(xué)習(xí)者的詞匯學(xué)習(xí)效果更顯著;尤其是在詞匯搭配、詞義聯(lián)想方面,全形式教學(xué)法顯著優(yōu)于意義優(yōu)先、聚焦形式教學(xué)法。
[Abstract]:In this paper, two different forms of teaching method, namely, meaning priority, Focus on Form (FONF) and Focus on Forms (FONFs), are studied in this paper. The meaning of the teaching method is to learn the new words in the course of completing the reading comprehension task, while the full-form teaching method uses the traditional vocabulary to learn the new words. The effect of two teaching methods on Chinese second language vocabulary learning is measured from five dimensions, and the results show that, on the whole, the full-form teaching method has more effect on the vocabulary learning of Chinese second language learners; in particular, in terms of the collocation of words and the association of the word meaning, The full-form teaching method is superior to the teaching method of the meaning and the focus form.
【作者單位】： 中山大學(xué)外國語學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大項目“漢語二語學(xué)習(xí)的認知過程與高效率教學(xué)模式研究”(項目編號:12&ZD224)的資助
【分類號】：H195
，

本文編號：2505833