【摘要】：舒天民生長于宋末元初,少年時(shí)宋朝敗亡,遂一生以隱儒自居,求學(xué)而不入仕。終其一生致力于編著《六藝綱目》一書,但此書剛成不久便駕鶴西去,令人惋惜。世人對(duì)《六藝綱目》一書鮮有提及,并以其為蒙童啟蒙之書。而舒天民在《六藝綱目》中的“六書”一節(jié)中,將“轉(zhuǎn)注”視為造字之法,然而世人多將“轉(zhuǎn)注”作為用字之法,并將《六藝綱目·六書》視作文字學(xué)著作。故筆者撰寫此文,以求革新世人之觀點(diǎn),弘揚(yáng)《六藝綱目》之影響。本文共分為五大部分。第一章,簡要介紹作者舒天民,以及其子舒恭、同郡人趙宜中等人；第二章,介紹《六藝綱目》的寫作目的以及其成書背景；第三章,探討《六藝綱目》的版本問題；第四章,簡要介紹《六藝綱目》中“六書”之外的其他“五藝”,包括“五禮”、“六樂”、“五射”、“五御”以及“九數(shù)”；第五章,為本文的重點(diǎn),主要討論《六藝綱目》的“六書”一節(jié),筆者通過逐一分析《六藝綱目·六書》中的文字學(xué)觀點(diǎn)來源：源于許氏《說文》的觀點(diǎn)、源于其他文字學(xué)者的觀點(diǎn)、舒君所創(chuàng)易于童蒙接受的觀點(diǎn)。以此來證明《六藝綱目·六書》并非文字學(xué)著作而實(shí)為蒙學(xué)教材。在世人多持否定態(tài)度的“轉(zhuǎn)注”一條,筆者通過分析舒天民的著述力證“轉(zhuǎn)注”為造字法。最后以小結(jié)的形式,總結(jié)舒天民“六書”一節(jié)。
[Abstract]:Shu Tianmin grew up in the late Song Dynasty and early Yuan Dynasty. When he was a teenager, the Song Dynasty was defeated and died. Throughout his life, he devoted himself to compiling the Compendium of six Arts, but it was a pity that the book had not been completed. There is little mention of the Compendium of six Arts in the world, and it is regarded as the enlightenment book of Mongolian children. In the section of "six Books" in the Compendium of six Arts, Shu Tianmin regards "transfer note" as the method of character making, but the world mostly regards "transfer note" as the method of using characters, and regards "six books of six arts compendium" as a work of philology. Therefore, the author writes this article in order to innovate the point of view of the world and carry forward the influence of the Compendium of six Arts. This paper is divided into five parts. The first chapter briefly introduces the author Shu Tianmin, his son Shu Gong, Zhao Yizhong, a native of the same county, Zhao Yizhong and others; the second chapter introduces the writing purpose of the six Arts Compendium and its background; the third chapter discusses the version of the six Arts Compendium; the fourth chapter briefly introduces the "five arts" other than the "six Books" in the six Arts Compendium, including "five propriety", "six Music", "five shots", "five Royal" and "Nine numbers". The fifth chapter, for the focus of this paper, mainly discusses the section of "six Books" in the Compendium of six Arts. By analyzing the sources of philology in the sixth Book of the Compendium of six Arts one by one, the author originates from the viewpoint of Xu's "Shuwen", originates from the point of view of other writers, and Shu Jun creates a point of view that is easy for Tong Meng to accept. In order to prove that the sixth Book of the six Arts Compendium is not a philology work, but actually a Mongolian textbook. In the negative attitude of the world, the author through the analysis of Shu Tianmin's writing power to prove that the "transfer note" is the word-making method. Finally, in the form of a summary, this paper summarizes the section of Shu Tianmin's six Books.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：H122

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 馮磊;《六藝綱目》及其“六書”理論管窺[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2016年

2 _5t駛，

本文編號(hào)：2499022