“害”字新證
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-03-31 07:31
【摘要】:通過對(duì)古文字“害”字形音義的綜合考察,結(jié)合音韻學(xué)的相關(guān)理論,我們論證了“害”字本會(huì)器蓋相合之意,古音本為盍部,因音近假借和異化音變分別歧出月部和魚部兩讀,表傷害義之“害”應(yīng)承自已有的月部音而與魚部音無涉。
[Abstract]:Through a comprehensive investigation of the phonological meaning of the character "harm" in ancient Chinese characters, and combining with the relevant theories of phonology, we have demonstrated that the meaning of the instrument cover of the book of "harm" is the same as that of the ancient phonetic book. The ancient phonological book is the cover part, and the two readings of the lunar part and the fish part are confused because of the phonological hypocrisy and the dissimilation of the phonological changes. The "harm" of the meaning of injury should be inherited from the existing part of the month, but not with the sound of the fish.
【作者單位】: 中山大學(xué)中文系、出土文獻(xiàn)與中國古代文明研究協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;
【分類號(hào)】:H121
本文編號(hào):2450695
[Abstract]:Through a comprehensive investigation of the phonological meaning of the character "harm" in ancient Chinese characters, and combining with the relevant theories of phonology, we have demonstrated that the meaning of the instrument cover of the book of "harm" is the same as that of the ancient phonetic book. The ancient phonological book is the cover part, and the two readings of the lunar part and the fish part are confused because of the phonological hypocrisy and the dissimilation of the phonological changes. The "harm" of the meaning of injury should be inherited from the existing part of the month, but not with the sound of the fish.
【作者單位】: 中山大學(xué)中文系、出土文獻(xiàn)與中國古代文明研究協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;
【分類號(hào)】:H121
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 韋靜;《現(xiàn)代漢語詞典》月部字(含“Q儭輩浚┮庖逑低逞芯縖D];廣西師范學(xué)院;2011年
,本文編號(hào):2450695
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2450695.html
最近更新
教材專著