發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-07 07:31

【摘要】：日語(yǔ)感情形容詞在使用上有人稱(chēng)限制,而漢語(yǔ)卻不存在這一現(xiàn)象,這體現(xiàn)了母語(yǔ)使用者在認(rèn)知上存在的差異。從功能來(lái)看,感情形容詞句可分為表抒句和描述句。在判別這兩種句式時(shí),日語(yǔ)中一般根據(jù)是否是感情形容詞的光桿形式,而漢語(yǔ)中則根據(jù)程度副詞的主客觀性以及是否與表感嘆的語(yǔ)氣詞共現(xiàn)等形式來(lái)進(jìn)行區(qū)分。也就是說(shuō),日語(yǔ)感情形容詞的光桿形式起感情表抒功能,而漢語(yǔ)感情形容詞的光桿形式起感情描述功能,這表明兩種語(yǔ)言在主觀性程度上有強(qiáng)弱之分。
[Abstract]:There are some restrictions on the use of Japanese emotive adjectives, but there is no such phenomenon in Chinese, which reflects the cognitive differences among native speakers. From the function point of view, the emotional adjective sentence can be divided into express sentence and descriptive sentence. In judging the two sentence patterns, Japanese is generally based on whether the emotive adjective is a bare pole form, while in Chinese it is based on the subjective objectivity of the degree adverb and whether or not it co-occurs with the motif of the exclamation. That is to say, the bare pole form of the emotional adjectives in Japanese plays an expressive role in emotional expression, while the bare pole form of the emotive adjective in Chinese has the function of emotional description, which indicates that the two languages are divided into two languages in terms of subjectivity.
【作者單位】： 信息工程大學(xué)洛陽(yáng)校區(qū);
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H146.2;H36

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張宇;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)構(gòu)式“怎么X也/都Y”研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2017年

2 宋璇;形容詞對(duì)舉格式研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2017年

3 韓佳;狀位ABB式形容詞語(yǔ)義屬性及語(yǔ)篇功能研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號(hào)：2403387